FNDA - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF (FNDA)
Rating:67Neutral
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Strong Recent Performance
The ETF has shown strong gains so far this year and over the last few months, indicating solid recent momentum.
Outperforming Top Holdings
Many of the largest positions, such as Lumentum, MKS, Acadia Healthcare, and several energy names, have delivered strong year-to-date returns that support the fund’s overall performance.
Broad Sector Diversification
The fund spreads its investments across many sectors, including industrials, financials, technology, consumer cyclical, real estate, and health care, which helps reduce the impact of weakness in any single industry.
Negative Factors
Single-Country Focus
With almost all assets in U.S. companies, the ETF offers very limited geographic diversification and is heavily exposed to the U.S. economy and market conditions.
Small-Cap Volatility Risk
Because the fund targets smaller companies, investors should expect more price swings and sensitivity to economic slowdowns compared with large-cap funds.
Moderate Expense Ratio
The ETF’s fee is not extremely high but is also not among the very lowest, meaning costs will modestly reduce long-term returns compared with the cheapest small-cap index options.
FNDA vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM9.23B
RegionNorth America
Expense Ratio0.25%
Beta0.96
IssuerSchwab
Inception DateAug 15, 2013
Dividend Yield1.12%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedRAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US Small Index - Benchmark TR Gross
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume409,320
30 Day Avg. Volume1,192,970
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
43.25Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering915
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
FNDA Summary
FNDA is the Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF, which follows the RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US Small Index. It focuses on smaller U.S. companies across many industries, including industrials, financials, and technology. Well-known names in the fund include Victoria’s Secret and Coherent Corp. Investors might consider FNDA if they want growth potential and diversification into small-cap stocks that are chosen based on business strength, like sales and cash flow. A key risk is that small-company stocks can be more volatile, so the ETF’s value can go up and down more sharply with the market.
How much will it cost me?The Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF (FNDA) has an expense ratio of 0.25%, meaning you’ll pay $2.50 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is lower than average for actively managed funds because FNDA uses a fundamental indexing strategy, which is more cost-efficient than traditional active management.
What would affect this ETF?FNDA, which focuses on U.S. small-cap stocks, could benefit from economic growth and innovation in sectors like technology and consumer cyclical, which are key areas of exposure. However, it may face challenges from rising interest rates or economic slowdowns, which tend to impact smaller companies more heavily due to their reliance on borrowing and market volatility. Regulatory changes or sector-specific disruptions, particularly in industries like real estate or financials, could also influence the ETF's performance.
FNDA Top 10 Holdings
FNDA’s story is all about U.S. small caps, with a noticeable tilt toward industrials, energy, and niche tech names. On the upside, Acadia Healthcare and refiners like Delek US and Par Pacific have been rising, giving the fund a solid boost. Tech-oriented holdings such as Lumentum and MKS Instruments have strong long-term momentum but lately look a bit tired, while Amkor and Coherent are more mixed, hinting at some volatility in semiconductor-related plays. Overall, performance is being driven by a handful of punchy small-cap winners in a diversified, U.S.-only lineup.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Compass | 0.47% | $43.38M | $9.00B | 60.58% | 61 Neutral | |
| Victoria's Secret | 0.47% | $43.36M | $7.10B | 356.61% | 71 Outperform | |
| Lumentum Holdings | 0.38% | $35.33M | $50.72B | 448.34% | 61 Neutral | |
| MKS | 0.35% | $32.52M | $19.27B | 156.53% | 75 Outperform | |
| Par Pacific Holdings | 0.34% | $31.38M | $3.97B | 159.76% | 67 Neutral | |
| Terex | 0.33% | $30.66M | $7.84B | 29.66% | 71 Outperform | |
| Acadia Healthcare | 0.33% | $30.64M | $3.04B | 21.83% | 61 Neutral | |
| Delek US Holdings | 0.33% | $30.12M | $3.85B | 183.62% | 49 Neutral | |
| ViaSat | 0.32% | $29.75M | $10.21B | 352.26% | 56 Neutral | |
| ArcBest | 0.31% | $28.21M | $3.33B | 97.42% | 66 Neutral |
FNDA Technical Analysis
Neutral
―
Price Trends
36.82
Positive
35.36
Positive
33.76
Positive
Market Momentum
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For FNDA, the sentiment is Neutral. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 37.48, equal to the 50-day MA of 36.82, and equal to the 200-day MA of 33.76, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of ― indicates undefined momentum. The RSI at ― is undefined, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of ― is undefined, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Neutral sentiment for FNDA.
FNDA Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
FNDA
Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF
37.20
8.81
31.03%
FESM
Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap ETF
―
―
―
VIOO
Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 ETF
―
―
―
SMLF
iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Multifactor ETF
―
―
―
CALF
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF
―
―
―
XSMO
Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents