tiprankstipranks
Advertisement

FNDA - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

FNDA

Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF (FNDA)

Rating:67Neutral
Price Target:
FNDA, the Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF, has a solid overall rating that reflects a mix of strong small-cap holdings alongside some financially weaker names. Positive contributors include MKS Instruments, which shows strong financial performance, cash flow generation, and strategic growth in high-demand areas like AI-driven technologies, and Crescent Energy, which benefits from a strong financial position, a transformative acquisition, and an attractive dividend. However, holdings such as Echostar, TRONOX, and Delek US Holdings face significant financial challenges and leverage concerns, making company-specific financial weakness and some sector risk the main factors that hold back the fund’s rating.
Positive Factors
Broad Small-Cap Diversification
The ETF spreads its investments across many small U.S. companies, which helps reduce the impact of any single stock on overall returns.
Strong Recent Performance
The fund has shown solid gains over the past month, three months, and year-to-date, indicating positive recent momentum.
Reasonable Expense Ratio for a Smart-Beta Strategy
The fund’s expense ratio is relatively low for a fundamentally weighted small-cap strategy, allowing investors to keep more of their returns.
Negative Factors
Heavy U.S.-Only Exposure
With almost all assets in U.S. stocks, the ETF offers little geographic diversification and is highly tied to the U.S. economy.
Mixed Performance Among Top Holdings
While several top positions have delivered strong gains, a few have been weak or slightly negative, which can create uneven performance.
Cyclical Sector Tilt
Large weights in economically sensitive sectors like industrials, financials, and consumer cyclical stocks may make the fund more vulnerable during economic slowdowns.

FNDA vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

FNDA Summary

FNDA is the Schwab Fundamental US Small Company Index ETF, which tracks the RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US Small Index. It focuses on smaller U.S. companies across many sectors, including industrials, financials, and technology. Some of its better-known holdings include Rocket Companies and Victoria’s Secret. Investors might consider FNDA if they want growth potential and diversification into small-cap stocks rather than just the big household names. However, small-company stocks can be more volatile, so the value of this ETF can go up and down more sharply than the overall market.
How much will it cost me?The Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF (FNDA) has an expense ratio of 0.25%, meaning you’ll pay $2.50 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is lower than average for actively managed funds because FNDA uses a fundamental indexing strategy, which is more cost-efficient than traditional active management.
What would affect this ETF?FNDA, which focuses on U.S. small-cap stocks, could benefit from economic growth and innovation in sectors like technology and consumer cyclical, which are key areas of exposure. However, it may face challenges from rising interest rates or economic slowdowns, which tend to impact smaller companies more heavily due to their reliance on borrowing and market volatility. Regulatory changes or sector-specific disruptions, particularly in industries like real estate or financials, could also influence the ETF's performance.

FNDA Top 10 Holdings

FNDA’s story is all about U.S. small caps, with a noticeable tilt toward industrials, energy, and tech. On the upside, Lumentum, Liberty Energy, Coherent, and Comfort Systems have been doing the heavy lifting, riding solid momentum and upbeat growth narratives. ViaSat and MKS are also helping, though their rich valuations keep expectations high. On the other side, real estate-focused Compass has been dragging its feet, while Terex and Vistance Networks look more mixed, occasionally stalling the fund’s progress. Overall, performance is being driven by a handful of rising small-cap specialists in cyclical, tech-oriented niches.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Lumentum Holdings0.82%$75.74M$59.04B1568.44%
61
Neutral
Compass0.42%$38.92M$5.32B-14.61%
61
Neutral
Echostar0.40%$37.45M$37.17B497.68%
57
Neutral
Coherent Corp0.40%$37.16M$48.40B410.40%
66
Neutral
MKS0.40%$36.68M$15.78B289.22%
75
Outperform
Crescent Energy Company Class A0.37%$34.60M$4.41B71.87%
66
Neutral
ViaSat0.37%$34.40M$7.29B503.26%
56
Neutral
TRONOX0.37%$34.40M$1.46B74.52%
57
Neutral
Par Pacific Holdings0.37%$34.40M$3.18B402.24%
67
Neutral
Delek US Holdings0.36%$33.67M$2.69B272.37%
49
Neutral

FNDA Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Positive
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
33.46
Negative
100DMA
32.59
Positive
200DMA
31.32
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
-0.30
Negative
RSI
50.37
Neutral
STOCH
76.14
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For FNDA, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 32.37, equal to the 50-day MA of 33.46, and equal to the 200-day MA of 31.32, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of -0.30 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 50.37 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 76.14 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for FNDA.

FNDA Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$9.34B0.25%
67
Neutral
$4.14B0.28%
65
Neutral
$3.40B0.07%
66
Neutral
$3.31B0.15%
67
Neutral
$3.24B0.59%
68
Neutral
$2.28B0.36%
68
Neutral
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
FNDA
Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF
32.78
8.61
35.62%
FESM
Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap ETF
VIOO
Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 ETF
SMLF
iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Multifactor ETF
CALF
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF
XSMO
Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement