Education
About Us
Working with TipRanks
Follow Us
FNDA - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF (FNDA)
Rating:67Neutral
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Broad Small-Cap Diversification
The ETF spreads its investments across many small U.S. companies, which helps reduce the impact of any single stock on overall returns.
Strong Recent Performance
The fund has shown solid gains over the past month, three months, and year-to-date, indicating positive recent momentum.
Reasonable Expense Ratio for a Smart-Beta Strategy
The fund’s expense ratio is relatively low for a fundamentally weighted small-cap strategy, allowing investors to keep more of their returns.
Negative Factors
Heavy U.S.-Only Exposure
With almost all assets in U.S. stocks, the ETF offers little geographic diversification and is highly tied to the U.S. economy.
Mixed Performance Among Top Holdings
While several top positions have delivered strong gains, a few have been weak or slightly negative, which can create uneven performance.
Cyclical Sector Tilt
Large weights in economically sensitive sectors like industrials, financials, and consumer cyclical stocks may make the fund more vulnerable during economic slowdowns.
FNDA vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM9.63B
RegionNorth America
Expense Ratio0.25%
Beta0.95
IssuerSchwab
Inception DateAug 15, 2013
Dividend Yield1.14%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedRAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US Small Index - Benchmark TR Gross
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume697,835
30 Day Avg. Volume860,383
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
38.36Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering891
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
FNDA Summary
FNDA is the Schwab Fundamental US Small Company Index ETF, which tracks the RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US Small Index. It focuses on smaller U.S. companies across many sectors, including industrials, financials, and technology. Some of its better-known holdings include Rocket Companies and Victoria’s Secret. Investors might consider FNDA if they want growth potential and diversification into small-cap stocks rather than just the big household names. However, small-company stocks can be more volatile, so the value of this ETF can go up and down more sharply than the overall market.
How much will it cost me?The Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF (FNDA) has an expense ratio of 0.25%, meaning you’ll pay $2.50 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is lower than average for actively managed funds because FNDA uses a fundamental indexing strategy, which is more cost-efficient than traditional active management.
What would affect this ETF?FNDA, which focuses on U.S. small-cap stocks, could benefit from economic growth and innovation in sectors like technology and consumer cyclical, which are key areas of exposure. However, it may face challenges from rising interest rates or economic slowdowns, which tend to impact smaller companies more heavily due to their reliance on borrowing and market volatility. Regulatory changes or sector-specific disruptions, particularly in industries like real estate or financials, could also influence the ETF's performance.
FNDA Top 10 Holdings
FNDA’s story is all about U.S. small caps, with a tilt toward industrials, financials, and consumer names rather than the usual Big Tech headliners. On the upside, chip-related players like MKS Instruments and Amkor are rising and quietly powering returns, while Victoria’s Secret and Rocket Companies add some consumer and housing-flavored momentum. Compass and ViaSat are also climbing, though their shaky profitability keeps them from being true stars. Meanwhile, Opendoor looks more like a flat tire than an engine, with weak momentum that’s holding back the fund’s otherwise improving mix.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Compass | 0.89% | $85.23M | $9.84B | 76.95% | 61 Neutral | |
| Lumentum Holdings | 0.52% | $50.11M | $23.57B | 376.43% | 61 Neutral | |
| Echostar | 0.49% | $47.39M | $34.46B | 362.37% | 57 Neutral | |
| ViaSat | 0.45% | $42.94M | $5.78B | 340.70% | 56 Neutral | |
| MKS | 0.42% | $40.17M | $14.69B | 113.90% | 75 Outperform | |
| Vistance Networks | 0.41% | $39.11M | $3.98B | 273.80% | 60 Neutral | |
| Amkor | 0.40% | $38.81M | $12.46B | 110.80% | 69 Neutral | |
| Rocket Companies | 0.39% | $37.41M | $59.73B | 8.71% | 54 Neutral | |
| Victoria's Secret | 0.39% | $37.29M | $4.70B | 47.47% | 71 Outperform | |
| Coherent Corp | 0.35% | $34.04M | $31.08B | 139.74% | 66 Neutral |
FNDA Technical Analysis
Positive
―
Price Trends
32.03
Positive
31.47
Positive
29.84
Positive
Market Momentum
0.53
Positive
59.75
Neutral
35.42
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For FNDA, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 33.10, equal to the 50-day MA of 32.03, and equal to the 200-day MA of 29.84, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 0.53 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 59.75 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 35.42 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for FNDA.
FNDA Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
FNDA
Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF
33.63
3.60
11.99%
FESM
Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap ETF
―
―
―
CALF
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF
―
―
―
VIOO
Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 ETF
―
―
―
SMLF
iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Multifactor ETF
―
―
―
XSMO
Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
Disclaimer
This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents