tiprankstipranks
Trending News
More News >
Advertisement

EUSA - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

EUSA

iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF (EUSA)

Rating:70Outperform
Price Target:
EUSA, the iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF, has a solid overall rating driven by several strong holdings with healthy business performance and growth stories, such as Pinterest, Texas Pacific Land, Netflix, and AppLovin, which benefit from robust earnings, strategic initiatives, and positive outlooks. This strength is partly offset by weaker names like LyondellBasell, which faces financial challenges and bearish momentum, and by common risks across several holdings such as high valuations, leverage, and bearish technical signals, making market volatility and stock-specific setbacks key risks to watch.
Positive Factors
Strong Top Holdings Performance
Many of the largest positions, especially in technology and related industries, have shown strong gains so far this year, helping support the fund’s overall results.
Broad Sector Diversification
The ETF spreads its investments across many sectors, including technology, industrials, financials, health care, and consumer stocks, which helps reduce the impact of weakness in any single area.
Low Expense Ratio
The fund charges a relatively low fee, so less of your return is lost to costs over time.
Negative Factors
Heavy U.S. Market Focus
Almost all of the ETF’s assets are invested in U.S. companies, offering very little geographic diversification outside the United States.
Cyclical Sector Exposure
Meaningful allocations to sectors like technology, industrials, and consumer cyclical stocks can make the fund more sensitive to economic slowdowns and market swings.
Modest Recent Performance
Recent returns over the past month and year to date have been positive but only modest, which may be less appealing to investors seeking stronger short-term momentum.

EUSA vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

EUSA Summary

EUSA is the iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF, which follows the MSCI USA Equal Weighted Index. Instead of letting the biggest companies dominate, it gives each stock about the same weight, spreading your money across many U.S. sectors like technology, industrials, and finance. Well-known holdings include Intel and Micron. Someone might invest in EUSA to get broad, diversified exposure to the U.S. stock market, including mid- and smaller-sized companies, not just the giants. A key risk is that it still invests fully in stocks, so its value can go up and down with the overall market.
How much will it cost me?The iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF (EUSA) has an expense ratio of 0.09%, which means you’ll pay $0.90 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is lower than average because it’s passively managed, tracking an equal-weighted index rather than relying on active stock selection.
What would affect this ETF?The EUSA ETF, with its equal-weighted approach and broad exposure to the U.S. market, could benefit from growth in sectors like technology and healthcare, which are significant parts of its portfolio. However, it may face challenges if economic conditions worsen, particularly impacting cyclical sectors like consumer discretionary and industrials, or if rising interest rates negatively affect financial and real estate stocks. Regulatory changes or geopolitical tensions could also influence the performance of its top holdings in technology and healthcare.

EUSA Top 10 Holdings

EUSA’s story right now is all about U.S. tech and chip-related names quietly steering the ship. Micron, Western Digital, Teradyne, Applied Materials, and Entegris are all rising, helped by enthusiasm around AI and semiconductor demand, giving the fund a solid tech-and-industry backbone. Corning is also pulling its weight with steady gains. On the flip side, Echostar is lagging and acts like a small anchor on performance. Overall, the ETF is broadly diversified across the U.S. market, but its top drivers are clearly in technology and industrial supply chains.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Block0.25%$3.80M$38.72B15.62%
72
Outperform
Cf Industries Holdings0.24%$3.75M$18.46B54.59%
72
Outperform
Dell Technologies0.24%$3.74M$97.66B55.82%
65
Neutral
Pinterest0.24%$3.68M$12.42B-41.77%
77
Outperform
LyondellBasell0.24%$3.62M$21.70B-6.68%
52
Neutral
Texas Pacific Land0.24%$3.61M$36.18B16.81%
76
Outperform
Netflix0.24%$3.61M$400.64B3.18%
73
Outperform
AppLovin0.23%$3.60M$155.64B69.28%
74
Outperform
Samsara0.23%$3.61M$18.51B-15.62%
69
Neutral
Occidental Petroleum0.23%$3.59M$54.82B20.56%
67
Neutral

EUSA Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Negative
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
106.46
Negative
100DMA
104.42
Positive
200DMA
101.98
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
-0.29
Positive
RSI
37.79
Neutral
STOCH
32.95
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For EUSA, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 107.01, equal to the 50-day MA of 106.46, and equal to the 200-day MA of 101.98, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of -0.29 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 37.79 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 32.95 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for EUSA.

EUSA Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$1.54B0.09%
70
Outperform
$10.00B0.04%
74
Outperform
$9.06B0.33%
72
Outperform
$8.89B0.21%
74
Outperform
$7.51B0.98%
67
Neutral
$7.16B0.02%
74
Outperform
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
EUSA
iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF
102.71
12.79
14.22%
PBUS
Invesco PureBeta MSCI USA ETF
CGUS
Capital Group Core Equity ETF
ONEQ
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
AKRE
Akre Focus ETF
BBUS
JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Disclaimer

This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement