DFAR - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
Dimensional US Real Estate ETF (DFAR)
Rating:69Neutral
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Strong Recent Performance
The ETF has shown strong gains so far this year and in recent months, indicating positive momentum in its real estate holdings.
Leading Real Estate Holdings
Several of the largest positions, especially in data centers, healthcare, and logistics real estate, have delivered strong performance and support the fund’s returns.
Low Expense Ratio
The fund charges a relatively low fee, which helps investors keep more of the returns generated by the portfolio.
Negative Factors
Sector Concentration Risk
Almost all assets are in the real estate sector, so the fund is highly sensitive to downturns in property markets and interest rate changes.
U.S.-Only Exposure
All of the ETF’s holdings are in U.S. companies, offering no geographic diversification outside the United States.
Reliance on a Few Large Positions
A small group of top holdings makes up a significant share of the portfolio, so weak performance in any of these names could weigh on overall returns.
DFAR vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM1.72B
RegionNorth America
Expense Ratio0.19%
Beta0.48
IssuerDimensional
Inception DateFeb 23, 2022
Dividend Yield2.73%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedNo Underlying Index
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume2,610,561
30 Day Avg. Volume2,262,726
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
28.44Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering127
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
DFAR Summary
Dimensional US Real Estate ETF (DFAR) is a fund that focuses on U.S. real estate companies instead of tracking a specific index. It mainly holds real estate investment trusts (REITs) that own properties like apartments, warehouses, data centers, and shopping malls. Well-known holdings include Prologis and Simon Property. Investors might consider DFAR to add diversification and real estate exposure to their portfolio without buying properties directly. However, this ETF is heavily tied to the real estate sector, so its value can rise or fall with changes in interest rates, property values, and the overall economy.
How much will it cost me?The Dimensional US Real Estate ETF (DFAR) has an expense ratio of 0.19%, meaning you’ll pay $1.90 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is lower than average for sector-focused ETFs because it is passively managed, aiming to track the performance of the U.S. real estate market rather than actively selecting stocks.
What would affect this ETF?The Dimensional US Real Estate ETF (DFAR) could benefit from economic growth and demographic trends that drive demand for commercial, residential, and industrial properties in the U.S., as well as potential increases in property values. However, rising interest rates or economic slowdowns could negatively impact the real estate sector, as higher borrowing costs and reduced consumer spending may affect property investments and valuations. The ETF's focus on top holdings like Prologis and American Tower highlights its exposure to key real estate segments, which could be influenced by changes in market conditions or regulatory policies.
DFAR Top 10 Holdings
DFAR is a pure play on U.S. real estate, and its story is being written by a few heavyweight landlords. Industrial giant Prologis and healthcare-focused Welltower have been rising steadily, giving the fund a solid backbone, while data-center leaders Equinix and Digital Realty add a tech-flavored twist with stronger long-term momentum but choppier recent trading. On the softer side, income favorite Realty Income has been lagging, acting like a small anchor on returns. Overall, the ETF is concentrated in REITs across logistics, data centers, and healthcare, all firmly rooted in the U.S. market.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Welltower | 7.07% | $121.91M | $146.07B | 33.06% | 77 Outperform | |
| Prologis | 6.86% | $118.21M | $137.61B | 32.69% | 76 Outperform | |
| Equinix | 5.34% | $92.11M | $106.61B | 17.11% | 73 Outperform | |
| Simon Property | 4.67% | $80.55M | $68.20B | 31.10% | 70 Outperform | |
| American Tower | 4.61% | $79.43M | $90.44B | -11.15% | 71 Outperform | |
| Realty Income | 4.35% | $74.99M | $56.73B | 8.64% | 70 Outperform | |
| Digital Realty | 4.27% | $73.61M | $65.64B | 3.10% | 69 Neutral | |
| Public Storage | 3.75% | $64.66M | $54.36B | 2.23% | 73 Outperform | |
| Crown Castle | 3.16% | $54.49M | $41.24B | -7.30% | 45 Neutral | |
| Ventas | 3.05% | $52.58M | $40.81B | 28.88% | 68 Neutral |
DFAR Technical Analysis
Positive
―
Price Trends
25.44
Positive
24.81
Positive
23.96
Positive
Market Momentum
0.13
Positive
60.61
Neutral
70.95
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For DFAR, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 25.88, equal to the 50-day MA of 25.44, and equal to the 200-day MA of 23.96, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 0.13 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 60.61 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 70.95 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for DFAR.
DFAR Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
DFAR
Dimensional US Real Estate ETF
26.39
3.37
14.64%
THRO
Ishares U.S. Thematic Rotation Active Etf
―
―
―
JTEK
JPMorgan U.S. Tech Leaders ETF
―
―
―
LCTU
BlackRock U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF
―
―
―
PWRD
Tcw Transform Systems Etf
―
―
―
UTES
Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents