tiprankstipranks
Trending News
More News >
Advertisement

DEEP - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

DEEP

Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF (DEEP)

Rating:64Neutral
Price Target:
DEEP, the Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF, has a solid overall rating driven by holdings like Teekay (TK), International Seaways (INSW), and SM Energy (SM), which combine attractive valuations, generally strong financial performance, and supportive technical or earnings-call trends. However, positions such as ZIM and Consensus Cloud Solutions (CCSI), which face issues like high leverage, inconsistent or challenged revenue growth, and bearish or overbought technical signals, along with exposure to cyclical energy and shipping names, introduce risk and help explain why the fund’s rating is not higher. The main risk factor is its tilt toward leveraged, economically sensitive companies in sectors like energy, shipping, and related industries, which can be volatile and sensitive to market and geopolitical conditions.
Positive Factors
Strong Recent Performance
The ETF has shown steady gains over the past month, three months, and year-to-date, indicating positive recent momentum.
Winning Top Holdings
Most of the top 10 stocks have delivered strong year-to-date performance, helping to drive the fund’s overall returns.
Broad Sector Mix
Holdings are spread across many sectors, including consumer, industrials, health care, technology, and energy, which helps reduce reliance on any single industry.
Negative Factors
High Expense Ratio
The fund charges a relatively high fee, which can eat into long-term returns compared with lower-cost ETFs.
Small Asset Base
With a modest amount of money invested in the fund, investors face higher risk that the ETF could be less liquid or potentially closed if it does not grow.
Heavy U.S. Concentration
Almost all of the ETF’s holdings are in U.S. companies, offering little geographic diversification outside the United States.

DEEP vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

DEEP Summary

The Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF (DEEP) tracks the Acquirers Deep Value Index, focusing on U.S. companies that appear cheaply priced compared with what they may be worth. It mainly holds smaller and mid-sized businesses across many sectors, including consumer, industrial, health care, and energy. Examples of holdings include Herbalife and Build-A-Bear Workshop. Someone might invest in DEEP if they want diversified exposure to “undervalued” stocks that could grow if the market eventually re-prices them higher. A key risk is that these beaten-down value stocks can stay out of favor for a long time and can go up and down sharply with the market.
How much will it cost me?The Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF (DEEP) has an expense ratio of 0.8%, which means you’ll pay $8 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than the average ETF expense ratio because DEEP is actively managed, focusing on a specialized deep value investment strategy that requires more research and analysis. It’s important to consider whether the potential returns from this strategy align with the higher cost.
What would affect this ETF?The Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF (DEEP) could benefit from a recovery in undervalued sectors like Consumer Cyclical and Industrials, especially if economic conditions improve and market sentiment shifts toward smaller, overlooked companies. However, rising interest rates or economic downturns may negatively impact mid-cap and small-cap stocks, which are more sensitive to financial pressures. Additionally, regulatory changes or sector-specific challenges in areas like Energy or Health Care could influence the ETF's performance.

DEEP Top 10 Holdings

DEEP is leaning hard into U.S. small- and mid-cap deep value, with a noticeable tilt toward energy and industrial names. Vaalco Energy, SM Energy, and Riley Exploration Permian have been rising, acting as key engines for the fund as investors warm to beaten-down energy plays. Shipping names like International Seaways and Ardmore Shipping have delivered steadier, if bumpier, support. On the flip side, ZIM and Amplify Energy look more mixed and occasionally lagging, reminding investors that deep value can feel like a rough sea even when the long-term course is promising.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Vaalco Energy1.77%$448.18K$651.61M60.26%
68
Neutral
SM Energy1.47%$372.63K$7.16B-2.05%
72
Outperform
International Seaways1.46%$370.43K$3.35B100.44%
72
Outperform
GeoPark1.42%$358.86K$502.84M26.61%
68
Neutral
ZIM1.38%$350.56K$3.12B45.23%
62
Neutral
Ardmore Shipping1.36%$344.55K$597.76M46.35%
70
Outperform
Smith & Wesson Brands1.35%$341.28K$630.92M49.11%
64
Neutral
Riley Exploration Permian1.33%$336.95K$754.21M17.39%
78
Outperform
1.33%$335.95K
Amplify Energy1.32%$335.15K$269.05M73.87%
53
Neutral

DEEP Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Negative
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
37.81
Negative
100DMA
36.54
Negative
200DMA
35.47
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
-0.59
Positive
RSI
34.39
Neutral
STOCH
18.64
Positive
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For DEEP, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 37.13, equal to the 50-day MA of 37.81, and equal to the 200-day MA of 35.47, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of -0.59 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 34.39 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 18.64 is Positive, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for DEEP.

DEEP Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$25.32M0.80%
64
Neutral
$70.35M0.69%
69
Neutral
$59.06M0.75%
73
Outperform
$58.20M0.60%
73
Outperform
$32.96M0.19%
61
Neutral
$4.43M0.88%
69
Neutral
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
DEEP
Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF
35.70
4.08
12.90%
OASC
OneAscent Small Cap Core ETF
SMOX
Horizon Small/Mid Cap Core Equity ETF
FSCS
First Trust Smid Capital Strength Etf
NIXT
Research Affiliates Deletions ETF
EPSV
Harbor SMID Cap Value ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement