tiprankstipranks
Trending News
More News >
Advertisement

FSCS - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

FSCS

First Trust Smid Capital Strength Etf (FSCS)

Rating:74Outperform
Price Target:
FSCS, the First Trust Smid Capital Strength ETF, earns a solid overall rating thanks to a collection of financially strong companies like Expeditors International and East West Bancorp, which show consistent revenue growth, solid profitability, and supportive technical trends. Additional holdings such as Woodward and Dover further boost the fund with strong earnings and strategic corporate actions, though some names like Laureate Education and Atmus Filtration Technologies introduce modest concerns around mixed technical signals, lack of dividend, or higher leverage. The main risk factor is that several holdings show signs of potential overbought conditions or valuation concerns, which could lead to short-term pullbacks even if the longer-term fundamentals remain sound.
Positive Factors
Strong Performing Holdings
Several top holdings, such as Leidos Holdings and Adtalem Global Education, have delivered strong year-to-date gains, supporting the fund’s overall performance.
Sector Diversification
The ETF spreads its investments across multiple sectors, including financials, industrials, and technology, reducing reliance on any single industry.
Moderate Expense Ratio
The fund’s expense ratio is reasonable compared to actively managed ETFs, helping investors retain more of their returns.
Negative Factors
Underperforming Holdings
Several top holdings, such as GoDaddy and Morningstar, have experienced weak year-to-date performance, which could drag on the fund’s returns.
High Geographic Concentration
The ETF is heavily concentrated in U.S. companies, offering little exposure to international markets and limiting diversification.
Small Asset Base
The fund’s relatively low assets under management may result in less liquidity and higher trading costs for investors.

FSCS vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

FSCS Summary

The First Trust Smid Capital Strength ETF (FSCS) is an investment fund that focuses on mid-sized and smaller companies with strong financial health. It follows the SMID Capital Strength Index and includes firms like Dynatrace and Leidos Holdings. This ETF is ideal for investors looking to diversify their portfolios and tap into the growth potential of companies outside the large-cap mainstream. However, new investors should be aware that its performance can be influenced by economic conditions affecting smaller companies, which may be more volatile than larger, established firms.
How much will it cost me?The First Trust Smid Capital Strength ETF (FSCS) has an expense ratio of 0.6%, which means you’ll pay $6 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average because the fund is actively managed, focusing on mid-sized and smaller companies with strong financial health, which requires more research and management effort.
What would affect this ETF?The First Trust Smid Capital Strength ETF could benefit from economic growth and innovation in mid-sized and smaller U.S. companies, especially in sectors like technology and financials, which are heavily weighted in the fund. However, it may face challenges from rising interest rates, which could impact smaller firms' borrowing costs, or economic slowdowns that disproportionately affect these companies. Regulatory changes in key sectors like financials and technology could also influence the ETF's performance.

FSCS Top 10 Holdings

The First Trust Smid Capital Strength ETF is leaning heavily into financials and industrials, which together make up over half of its portfolio. Woodward is a standout performer, rising steadily thanks to strong earnings and strategic moves like share repurchases. Expeditors International and Coca-Cola Bottling are also contributing positively, though their momentum is more measured. On the flip side, Jack Henry & Associates is lagging, struggling with short-term challenges despite solid fundamentals. With its focus on U.S.-based mid-sized companies, this fund offers a concentrated play on North American innovation and resilience.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Expeditors International1.28%$731.13K$21.20B44.97%
80
Outperform
Woodward1.25%$714.76K$19.11B78.99%
79
Outperform
New York Times1.24%$706.97K$11.63B41.04%
79
Outperform
East West Bancorp1.20%$686.42K$16.35B27.09%
79
Outperform
Atmus Filtration Technologies, Inc.1.20%$683.89K$4.42B38.63%
78
Outperform
Mueller Industries1.20%$682.36K$13.47B55.13%
78
Outperform
Jack Henry & Associates1.19%$680.78K$13.59B9.16%
77
Outperform
Dover1.18%$672.42K$27.70B9.99%
79
Outperform
Laureate Education1.18%$670.05K$5.23B96.73%
73
Outperform
Genpact1.17%$669.58K$8.21B9.88%
78
Outperform

FSCS Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Positive
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
35.63
Positive
100DMA
36.04
Positive
200DMA
35.54
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
0.19
Negative
RSI
62.95
Neutral
STOCH
81.45
Negative
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For FSCS, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 36.24, equal to the 50-day MA of 35.63, and equal to the 200-day MA of 35.54, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 0.19 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 62.95 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 81.45 is Negative, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for FSCS.

FSCS Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$56.24M0.60%
$69.87M0.69%
$53.02M0.75%
$41.04M0.38%
$34.49M0.50%
$28.90M0.80%
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
FSCS
First Trust Smid Capital Strength Etf
36.77
1.98
5.69%
OASC
OneAscent Small Cap Core ETF
SMOX
Horizon Small/Mid Cap Core Equity ETF
ASCE
Allspring SMID Core ETF
TMFX
Motley Fool Next Index ETF
HSMV
First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Small/Mid ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Disclaimer

This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement