Education
About Us
Working with TipRanks
Follow Us
CZAR - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
Themes Natural Monopoly ETF (CZAR)
Rating:70Outperform
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Strong Year-to-Date Performance
The ETF has delivered solid gains so far this year, indicating strong overall momentum.
Diversified Sector Exposure
The fund invests across multiple sectors, including technology, industrials, and financials, which helps reduce risk from sector-specific downturns.
Reasonable Expense Ratio
The ETF charges a competitive expense ratio, making it cost-effective compared to many actively managed funds.
Negative Factors
Heavy U.S. Concentration
Over 70% of the fund's geographic exposure is in the U.S., limiting diversification across global markets.
Mixed Performance Among Top Holdings
While some top holdings like Amphenol and Broadcom have performed strongly, others like Aon have lagged, creating uneven contributions to the fund's returns.
Limited Exposure to Defensive Sectors
The ETF has relatively low exposure to defensive sectors like utilities and consumer defensive, which could make it more sensitive to market volatility.
CZAR vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM1.61M
RegionDeveloped Markets
Expense Ratio0.35%
Beta0.70
IssuerThemes
Inception DateDec 13, 2023
Dividend Yield2.3%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedSolactive Natural Monopoly Index - Benchmark TR Gross
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume246
30 Day Avg. Volume362
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
37.22Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering96
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
CZAR Summary
The Themes Natural Monopoly ETF (Ticker: CZAR) is an investment fund that focuses on companies with strong control over their markets, often called natural monopolies. It follows the Solactive Natural Monopoly Index and includes well-known companies like Broadcom and Visa. These businesses benefit from limited competition and high barriers to entry, making them leaders in their industries. Investors might consider CZAR for its potential long-term growth and stability, as it offers exposure to dominant companies across sectors like technology and financials. However, new investors should be aware that the ETF’s performance can fluctuate with market conditions, especially since it is heavily weighted toward tech and industrial sectors.
How much will it cost me?The Themes Natural Monopoly ETF (CZAR) has an expense ratio of 0.35%, meaning you’ll pay $3.50 per year for every $1,000 invested. This cost is slightly higher than average for ETFs because it is actively managed, focusing on a unique niche of companies with natural monopolies. Active management typically involves more research and oversight, which can increase costs.
What would affect this ETF?The CZAR ETF, with its focus on dominant companies in developed markets, could benefit from continued technological innovation and strong consumer demand in sectors like Technology and Industrials, which make up a significant portion of its portfolio. However, rising interest rates or stricter regulations in industries such as Financials or Technology could negatively impact growth prospects for some of its top holdings like Mastercard, Broadcom, or Meta Platforms. Global economic conditions and geopolitical tensions may also influence the performance of its diverse sector exposure.
CZAR Top 10 Holdings
The Themes Natural Monopoly ETF (CZAR) leans heavily into technology, with names like Cisco and Broadcom providing steady growth thanks to their focus on AI and infrastructure software. Visa and Mastercard add a financial flair, showing mixed signals as robust revenue growth faces valuation concerns. Adobe, despite its innovative AI push, has been lagging recently, weighing on the fund’s performance. Meanwhile, industrial giant BAE Systems has struggled with bearish momentum, tempering gains. Overall, CZAR’s developed-market focus and tilt toward dominant players in tech and finance create a concentrated yet compelling growth story.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amphenol | 4.99% | $80.22K | $168.85B | 92.76% | 78 Outperform | |
| Broadcom | 4.55% | $73.01K | $1.66T | 42.74% | 76 Outperform | |
| Cisco Systems | 4.05% | $65.07K | $308.26B | 30.08% | 77 Outperform | |
| BlackRock | 3.72% | $59.76K | $177.65B | 3.29% | 77 Outperform | |
| Mastercard | 3.66% | $58.79K | $520.34B | 8.08% | 75 Outperform | |
| Aon | 3.52% | $56.58K | $76.66B | -1.33% | 66 Neutral | |
| Visa | 3.52% | $56.54K | $679.11B | 10.67% | 70 Outperform | |
| Autodesk | 3.37% | $54.16K | $63.22B | -0.69% | 74 Outperform | |
| Adobe | 3.25% | $52.16K | $147.76B | -21.59% | 80 Outperform | |
| BAE Systems | 3.23% | $51.82K | £49.94B | 62.49% | 61 Neutral |
CZAR Technical Analysis
Positive
―
Price Trends
31.66
Positive
31.68
Positive
30.83
Positive
Market Momentum
0.13
Negative
60.60
Neutral
38.66
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For CZAR, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 31.77, equal to the 50-day MA of 31.66, and equal to the 200-day MA of 30.83, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 0.13 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 60.60 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 38.66 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for CZAR.
CZAR Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
CZAR
Themes Natural Monopoly ETF
32.18
3.74
13.15%
WLDR
Affinity World Leaders Equity ETF
―
―
―
KNO
AXS Knowledge Leaders ETF
―
―
―
HDMV
First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed Intl ETF
―
―
―
RW
Rainwater Equity ETF
―
―
―
GLBL
Pacer MSCI World Industry Advantage ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
Disclaimer
This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents