CZAR - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
Themes Natural Monopoly ETF (CZAR)
Rating:70Outperform
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Strong Leading Holdings
Several of the largest positions, such as BAE Systems, Broadcom, Cisco, Honeywell, and ASX, have shown strong year-to-date performance, helping support the fund.
Global Diversification
Holdings spread across the U.S., Europe, Asia, and other regions help reduce the impact of weakness in any single country.
Balanced Sector Mix
Exposure across technology, financials, industrials, health care, and other sectors provides a mix of growth and stability drivers.
Negative Factors
Recent Overall Weak Performance
The ETF’s year-to-date and three-month returns have been slightly negative, indicating recent performance has lagged despite a strong one-month rebound.
Underperforming Financial Holdings
Some key financial stocks like BlackRock, Raymond James, Mastercard, and Visa have shown weak year-to-date performance, which can drag on the fund.
Moderate Expense Ratio for a Small Fund
The fund’s expense ratio is not especially low and, combined with its relatively small asset base, means costs may weigh more on investor returns over time.
CZAR vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM1.59M
RegionDeveloped Markets
Expense Ratio0.35%
Beta0.71
IssuerThemes
Inception DateDec 13, 2023
Dividend Yield2.31%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedSolactive Natural Monopoly Index - Benchmark TR Gross
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume108
30 Day Avg. Volume150
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
37.40Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering97
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
CZAR Summary
The Themes Natural Monopoly ETF (CZAR) tracks the Solactive Natural Monopoly Index, focusing on powerful companies that dominate their markets and face little competition. It holds firms across many sectors and countries, with a tilt toward technology, finance, and industrials. Well-known holdings include Visa, Mastercard, Cisco, Broadcom, Honeywell, and BlackRock. Someone might invest in CZAR for long-term growth and diversification through a global mix of market leaders with strong competitive advantages. A key risk is that these stocks can still go up and down with the overall market and may be hurt if regulators target dominant companies.
How much will it cost me?The Themes Natural Monopoly ETF (CZAR) has an expense ratio of 0.35%, meaning you’ll pay $3.50 per year for every $1,000 invested. This cost is slightly higher than average for ETFs because it is actively managed, focusing on a unique niche of companies with natural monopolies. Active management typically involves more research and oversight, which can increase costs.
What would affect this ETF?The CZAR ETF, with its focus on dominant companies in developed markets, could benefit from continued technological innovation and strong consumer demand in sectors like Technology and Industrials, which make up a significant portion of its portfolio. However, rising interest rates or stricter regulations in industries such as Financials or Technology could negatively impact growth prospects for some of its top holdings like Mastercard, Broadcom, or Meta Platforms. Global economic conditions and geopolitical tensions may also influence the performance of its diverse sector exposure.
CZAR Top 10 Holdings
CZAR leans heavily on tech and financial “tollbooths” in developed markets, and that’s where most of the action is. Cisco is one of the fund’s clear bright spots, rising on the back of strong results and AI buzz, while Broadcom’s recent wobble shows that even chip powerhouses can hit speed bumps. On the industrial side, Honeywell is holding steady, but BAE Systems has been lagging and dulling some of that strength. In payments, Visa and Mastercard look fundamentally solid but their shares have been losing steam, slightly dragging on overall performance.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cisco Systems | 5.10% | $80.56K | $474.59B | 90.79% | 77 Outperform | |
| Broadcom | 4.94% | $77.97K | $1.96T | 81.07% | 76 Outperform | |
| BAE Systems | 4.54% | $71.77K | £58.51B | 7.02% | 61 Neutral | |
| Honeywell International | 4.47% | $70.55K | $144.42B | 2.65% | 77 Outperform | |
| ASX | 4.45% | $70.32K | AU$11.63B | -12.57% | 54 Neutral | |
| Fortive | 4.35% | $68.63K | $18.03B | -15.13% | 72 Outperform | |
| BlackRock | 3.70% | $58.39K | $174.73B | 11.40% | 77 Outperform | |
| Raymond James Financial | 3.39% | $53.47K | $29.52B | 4.22% | 76 Outperform | |
| Visa | 3.34% | $52.79K | $619.65B | -6.98% | 70 Outperform | |
| Mastercard | 3.21% | $50.78K | $440.50B | -11.54% | 75 Outperform |
CZAR Technical Analysis
Positive
―
Price Trends
31.27
Positive
31.61
Positive
31.65
Positive
Market Momentum
0.12
Negative
57.24
Neutral
96.83
Negative
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For CZAR, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 31.71, equal to the 50-day MA of 31.27, and equal to the 200-day MA of 31.65, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 0.12 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 57.24 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 96.83 is Negative, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for CZAR.
CZAR Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
CZAR
Themes Natural Monopoly ETF
32.02
1.28
4.16%
WLDR
Affinity World Leaders Equity ETF
―
―
―
KNO
AXS Knowledge Leaders ETF
―
―
―
RW
Rainwater Equity ETF
―
―
―
HDMV
First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed Intl ETF
―
―
―
GLBL
Pacer MSCI World Industry Advantage ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents