tiprankstipranks
Advertisement

RW - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

RW

Rainwater Equity ETF (RW)

Rating:62Neutral
Price Target:
RW, the Rainwater Equity ETF, has a solid overall rating that reflects its focus on financially strong companies with growth potential. Key holdings like Apple, HEICO, Ametek, and APi Group support the fund’s quality through strong financial performance, positive earnings commentary, and generally favorable technical trends, even though many appear richly valued. Some positions such as Diploma, Loar Holdings, Berkshire Hathaway B, and Nvidia face bearish or weaker technical signals and valuation concerns, and the fund’s concentration in a relatively small set of industrial and technology-oriented names is a main risk factor if market conditions turn against these areas.
Positive Factors
Strong Recent Performance
The ETF has delivered steady gains over the past month and year-to-date, showing positive momentum for investors.
High-Quality Top Holdings
Several major positions, including well-known companies like Berkshire Hathaway, Apple, Alphabet, and other strong performers, have helped support the fund’s results.
Sector Diversification Within Industrials and Technology
While Industrials and Technology dominate, the fund still spreads assets across additional sectors like Financials, Health Care, and Consumer Cyclical, which can help smooth returns.
Negative Factors
High Expense Ratio
The fund’s management fee is relatively high for an ETF, which can eat into long-term returns compared with lower-cost options.
Heavy Concentration in Industrials and Technology
A large share of assets is tied to Industrials and Technology, so a downturn in these areas could have an outsized impact on the fund.
Moderate Stock Concentration in Top Holdings
The top positions each carry meaningful weights, so weakness in a few key names—such as any lagging holdings—could noticeably affect overall performance.

RW vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

RW Summary

Rainwater Equity ETF (RW) is an actively managed fund that aims for growth by investing mainly in mid- and large-sized companies across the U.S. and other developed markets, rather than tracking a fixed index. It focuses heavily on industrial and technology businesses and holds well-known names like Apple, Alphabet (Google), Berkshire Hathaway, and GE Aerospace. Someone might invest in RW to seek long-term growth and diversification across different sectors and countries. A key risk is that the fund is concentrated in a smaller number of growth-focused stocks, so its price can move up and down more than the overall market.
How much will it cost me?The Rainwater Equity ETF has an expense ratio of 1.25%, meaning you’ll pay $12.50 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average because it is actively managed, which involves more research and decision-making compared to passively managed funds that track an index.
What would affect this ETF?Rainwater Equity ETF's focus on developed markets and growth-oriented sectors like Industrials and Technology positions it well to benefit from advancements in innovation and infrastructure spending, which could drive long-term growth. However, its heavy reliance on specific sectors and top holdings like GE Aerospace and Broadcom makes it vulnerable to sector-specific downturns or regulatory changes, particularly in technology and industrial industries. Additionally, broader economic conditions, such as rising interest rates, could negatively impact growth-focused investments.

RW Top 10 Holdings

RW is leaning heavily into industrial names, with aerospace and engineering stocks like Loar Holdings, HEICO, GE Aerospace, and Ametek doing much of the heavy lifting as they continue to rise. Diploma adds a steady, if slightly slower, boost, while Berkshire Hathaway offers a more conservative anchor with modest gains. On the tech side, Apple looks to be losing a bit of steam lately and Alphabet’s performance has been mixed, so Big Tech isn’t the main engine here. Overall, the fund is concentrated in developed-market industrials with a supporting cast of U.S. tech and financials.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Loar Holdings Inc.7.21%$1.26M$6.81B0.91%
68
Neutral
HEICO6.68%$1.17M$41.39B5.69%
77
Outperform
Diploma5.90%$1.03M£9.65B33.03%
66
Neutral
Berkshire Hathaway B5.34%$936.02K$970.39B2.46%
66
Neutral
Apple4.34%$760.33K$4.53T35.14%
79
Outperform
GE Aerospace4.24%$743.50K$354.68B27.60%
72
Outperform
4.04%$708.02K
Ametek3.45%$604.61K$55.56B29.44%
79
Outperform
Mastercard3.23%$566.27K$525.48B1.31%
75
Outperform
Alphabet Class A3.22%$564.21K$4.24T67.50%
85
Outperform

RW Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Neutral
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
25.35
Positive
100DMA
24.88
Positive
200DMA
24.85
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
0.05
Positive
RSI
48.83
Neutral
STOCH
32.87
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For RW, the sentiment is Neutral. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 25.67, equal to the 50-day MA of 25.35, and equal to the 200-day MA of 24.85, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of 0.05 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 48.83 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 32.87 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Neutral sentiment for RW.

RW Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$17.53M0.95%
62
Neutral
$239.44M0.50%
74
Outperform
$45.82M0.75%
69
Neutral
$18.39M0.49%
69
Neutral
$17.52M0.80%
62
Neutral
$4.46M0.70%
63
Neutral
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
RW
Rainwater Equity ETF
25.48
0.18
0.71%
GDIV
Harbor Dividend Growth Leaders ETF
KNO
AXS Knowledge Leaders ETF
TNXT
T. Rowe Price Innovation Leaders ETF
HDMV
First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed Intl ETF
TXUG
Thornburg International Growth Fund ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement