tiprankstipranks
Advertisement

CTEX - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

CTEX

ProShares S&P Kensho Cleantech ETF (CTEX)

Rating:62Neutral
Price Target:
CTEX, the ProShares S&P Kensho Cleantech ETF, has a solid but not top-tier rating, reflecting a mix of strong leaders and more challenged names in the clean technology space. High-quality holdings like NEXTracker, Applied Materials, Corning, and GE Vernova support the fund with robust financial performance, growth, and generally positive momentum, while weaker positions such as T1 Energy, Ballard Power Systems, and Plug Power face losses, high leverage, or bearish trends that drag on the overall assessment. The main risk is that many holdings operate in capital-intensive, often unprofitable clean-tech segments, which can make the ETF sensitive to sector volatility and company-specific setbacks.
Positive Factors
Strong Year-to-Date Results
The ETF has delivered solid gains so far this year, showing positive momentum overall.
Leading Clean-Tech Holdings
Several of the largest positions, such as Bloom Energy, Corning, and Applied Materials, have shown strong performance, helping support the fund’s returns.
Focused Exposure to Industrials and Technology
The fund concentrates on industrial and technology companies tied to clean technology, giving investors targeted exposure to this growth-oriented theme.
Negative Factors
High Expense Ratio
The fund’s fee is relatively high for an ETF, which can eat into long-term returns compared with lower-cost alternatives.
Recent Short-Term Volatility
Despite positive year-to-date performance, the ETF has experienced a weak three-month stretch, indicating choppy short-term performance.
Concentrated Sector and U.S. Exposure
Holdings are heavily tilted toward U.S. industrial and technology stocks, which increases sensitivity to downturns in these areas and limits geographic diversification.

CTEX vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

CTEX Summary

ProShares S&P Kensho Cleantech ETF (CTEX) is a fund that follows the S&P Kensho Cleantech Index, focusing on companies involved in clean and renewable energy. It holds businesses working on solar, wind, and other green technologies, including well-known names like Applied Materials and Corning. Investors might consider CTEX if they want growth potential from the long-term shift toward cleaner energy and to support environmentally friendly companies. However, this ETF is concentrated in the cleantech and renewable energy sector, so its price can be very volatile and may rise or fall more than the overall stock market.
How much will it cost me?The ProShares S&P Kensho Cleantech ETF (CTEX) has an expense ratio of 0.58%, meaning you’ll pay $5.80 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average because it’s actively managed to focus on a specific niche in renewable energy, which requires more research and specialized management.
What would affect this ETF?The ProShares S&P Kensho Cleantech ETF (CTEX) could benefit from increasing global demand for renewable energy and supportive government policies promoting clean technology. However, it may face challenges from rising interest rates, which can impact the cost of financing for companies in the Industrials and Technology sectors, as well as potential regulatory hurdles or competition within the renewable energy market. Its focus on U.S.-based companies and reliance on top holdings like Bloom Energy and SolarEdge Technologies makes it sensitive to domestic economic conditions and technological advancements.

CTEX Top 10 Holdings

CTEX is leaning hard into the clean-tech story, with a heavy tilt toward U.S.-listed industrial and tech names powering the energy transition. Bloom Energy and GE Vernova have been doing much of the heavy lifting lately, riding solid momentum in renewables. Corning and Applied Materials add a tech-flavored backbone, steadily supporting returns as demand for advanced materials and chip equipment stays firm. On the flip side, T1 Energy and Enphase are losing steam, and SolarEdge looks wobbly, creating a tug-of-war between rising innovators and lagging solar players.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Bloom Energy6.81%$438.72K$79.84B1364.98%
62
Neutral
GE Vernova Inc.4.92%$317.31K$288.06B147.64%
69
Neutral
T1 Energy4.87%$313.74K$1.63B313.70%
40
Underperform
Generac Holdings4.82%$310.57K$15.87B108.87%
59
Neutral
Corning4.39%$282.69K$170.61B316.30%
74
Outperform
Energy Vault Holdings4.26%$274.54K$926.46M388.07%
67
Neutral
Plug Power4.24%$273.00K$4.97B338.96%
51
Neutral
Ballard Power Systems3.67%$236.22K$1.25B199.28%
47
Neutral
Nextpower Inc3.53%$227.17K$18.61B131.78%
78
Outperform
Enphase Energy3.46%$222.86K$4.94B-17.86%
61
Neutral

CTEX Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Positive
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
37.35
Positive
100DMA
37.91
Positive
200DMA
34.58
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
1.94
Negative
RSI
71.77
Negative
STOCH
85.68
Negative
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For CTEX, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 40.38, equal to the 50-day MA of 37.35, and equal to the 200-day MA of 34.58, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 1.94 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 71.77 is Negative, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 85.68 is Negative, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for CTEX.

CTEX Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$6.44M0.58%
62
Neutral
$97.47M0.50%
71
Outperform
$46.99M0.35%
68
Neutral
$38.70M0.57%
63
Neutral
$37.99M0.65%
77
Outperform
$35.31M0.65%
70
Outperform
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
CTEX
ProShares S&P Kensho Cleantech ETF
44.90
23.84
113.20%
MILN
Global X Millennial Consumer ETF
CCSO
Carbon Collective Climate Solutions U.S. Equity ETF
JXX
Janus Henderson Transformational Growth ETF
XPND
First Trust Expanded Technology ETF
RBLD
First Trust Alerian US NextGen Infrastructure ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement