tiprankstipranks
Advertisement

COWZ - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

COWZ

Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ)

Rating:72Outperform
Price Target:
COWZ (Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF) earns a solid overall rating thanks to several strong, diversified holdings with healthy financial performance and growth prospects. High-quality names like General Dynamics, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead Sciences, and T-Mobile support the fund through strong earnings, robust backlogs or product portfolios, and generally favorable long-term outlooks, while some holdings such as Altria and Booking Holdings introduce risks around leverage, technical weakness, and industry challenges. The main risk factor is that several top positions show bearish or cautious technical signals and leverage concerns, which could increase volatility even though the underlying businesses are generally strong.
Positive Factors
Solid Recent Performance
The ETF has shown strong gains so far this year and over the last few months, indicating positive recent momentum.
Sector Diversification Across the Economy
Holdings spread across technology, health care, consumer, energy, and other sectors help reduce the impact of weakness in any single industry.
Large and Growing Asset Base
The fund manages a very high level of assets, suggesting it has attracted significant investor interest and offers good liquidity.
Negative Factors
Heavy U.S. Concentration
Almost all of the ETF’s holdings are in U.S. companies, which limits international diversification and ties performance closely to the U.S. market.
Mixed Performance Among Top Holdings
Several of the largest positions, such as Booking Holdings, Uber, Comcast, and HCA Healthcare, have shown weak or lagging performance this year, which can drag on overall returns.
Moderate Expense Ratio
The fund’s fee is not extremely high but is also not among the lowest, meaning costs will modestly reduce long-term returns compared with cheaper ETFs.

COWZ vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

COWZ Summary

COWZ is the Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF, which follows the Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index. It focuses on large U.S. companies that generate strong cash flow, aiming to invest in businesses that are financially solid and profitable. The fund holds well-known names like T-Mobile and Uber, along with major health care and energy companies, giving investors broad exposure across several industries. Someone might invest in COWZ for potential growth and diversification while focusing on companies with strong cash generation. However, it can still go up and down with the overall stock market, so returns are not guaranteed.
How much will it cost me?The Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) has an expense ratio of 0.49%, which means you’ll pay $4.90 per year for every $1,000 invested. This cost is slightly higher than average for ETFs because it is actively managed, focusing on companies with high free cash flow yields. Active management typically involves more research and strategy, which can increase expenses.
What would affect this ETF?The Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) could benefit from strong performance in sectors like Technology and Health Care, which are heavily represented in its holdings, especially if innovation and demand in these areas continue to grow. However, economic challenges such as rising interest rates or a slowdown in consumer spending could negatively impact some of its Consumer Cyclical and Defensive holdings. Additionally, regulatory changes or geopolitical tensions affecting the U.S. market might influence the ETF's performance due to its focus on large-cap U.S. companies.

COWZ Top 10 Holdings

COWZ is leaning heavily into U.S. cash-generating giants, with health care, energy, and communication names doing much of the heavy lifting. Marathon Petroleum has been a real engine for the fund, rising steadily and giving the portfolio a strong energy kick, while Bristol-Myers Squibb and Gilead add stable, rising health care cash flows. On the flip side, Booking Holdings and Uber have been losing steam, dragging on recent returns, and HCA Healthcare looks mixed at best. Overall, it’s a U.S.-focused, cash-flow-first strategy with a few laggards tempering otherwise solid momentum.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Booking Holdings2.23%$416.64M$149.74B-10.47%
63
Neutral
Bristol-Myers Squibb2.17%$404.95M$132.45B47.66%
78
Outperform
General Dynamics2.05%$382.83M$103.41B23.39%
80
Outperform
Marathon Petroleum2.05%$382.51M$91.69B91.18%
66
Neutral
HCA Healthcare2.04%$380.31M$85.69B12.78%
70
Neutral
Intuit2.04%$380.15M$86.30B-59.28%
73
Outperform
AT&T1.95%$364.79M$159.04B-16.22%
71
Outperform
Gilead Sciences1.95%$363.43M$162.99B15.05%
78
Outperform
Verizon1.95%$363.39M$192.54B9.16%
81
Outperform
Ford Motor1.91%$356.60M$59.26B35.67%
71
Outperform

COWZ Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Positive
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
64.07
Positive
100DMA
63.32
Positive
200DMA
61.77
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
RSI
STOCH
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For COWZ, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 64.96, equal to the 50-day MA of 64.07, and equal to the 200-day MA of 61.77, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of ― indicates undefined momentum. The RSI at ― is undefined, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of ― is undefined, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for COWZ.

COWZ Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$18.66B0.49%
72
Outperform
$970.55B0.03%
74
Outperform
$863.10B0.03%
74
Outperform
$776.18B0.09%
74
Outperform
$450.09B0.18%
73
Outperform
$158.18B0.02%
74
Outperform
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
COWZ
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF
66.91
12.36
22.66%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
SPY
SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust
QQQ
Invesco QQQ Trust
SPYM
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement