COWZ - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ)
Rating:72Outperform
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Solid Recent Performance
The ETF has shown strong gains so far this year and over the last few months, indicating positive recent momentum.
Sector Diversification Across the Economy
Holdings spread across technology, health care, consumer, energy, and other sectors help reduce the impact of weakness in any single industry.
Large and Growing Asset Base
The fund manages a very high level of assets, suggesting it has attracted significant investor interest and offers good liquidity.
Negative Factors
Heavy U.S. Concentration
Almost all of the ETF’s holdings are in U.S. companies, which limits international diversification and ties performance closely to the U.S. market.
Mixed Performance Among Top Holdings
Several of the largest positions, such as Booking Holdings, Uber, Comcast, and HCA Healthcare, have shown weak or lagging performance this year, which can drag on overall returns.
Moderate Expense Ratio
The fund’s fee is not extremely high but is also not among the lowest, meaning costs will modestly reduce long-term returns compared with cheaper ETFs.
COWZ vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM19.87B
RegionNorth America
Expense Ratio0.49%
Beta0.71
IssuerPacer
Inception DateDec 16, 2016
Dividend Yield1.72%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedPacer US Cash Cows 100 Index
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume836,797
30 Day Avg. Volume951,978
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
78.38Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering100
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
COWZ Summary
COWZ is the Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF, which follows the Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index. It focuses on large U.S. companies that generate strong cash flow, aiming to invest in businesses that are financially solid and profitable. The fund holds well-known names like T-Mobile and Uber, along with major health care and energy companies, giving investors broad exposure across several industries. Someone might invest in COWZ for potential growth and diversification while focusing on companies with strong cash generation. However, it can still go up and down with the overall stock market, so returns are not guaranteed.
How much will it cost me?The Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) has an expense ratio of 0.49%, which means you’ll pay $4.90 per year for every $1,000 invested. This cost is slightly higher than average for ETFs because it is actively managed, focusing on companies with high free cash flow yields. Active management typically involves more research and strategy, which can increase expenses.
What would affect this ETF?The Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) could benefit from strong performance in sectors like Technology and Health Care, which are heavily represented in its holdings, especially if innovation and demand in these areas continue to grow. However, economic challenges such as rising interest rates or a slowdown in consumer spending could negatively impact some of its Consumer Cyclical and Defensive holdings. Additionally, regulatory changes or geopolitical tensions affecting the U.S. market might influence the ETF's performance due to its focus on large-cap U.S. companies.
COWZ Top 10 Holdings
COWZ is leaning heavily into U.S. cash-generating giants, with health care, energy, and communication names doing much of the heavy lifting. Marathon Petroleum has been a real engine for the fund, rising steadily and giving the portfolio a strong energy kick, while Bristol-Myers Squibb and Gilead add stable, rising health care cash flows. On the flip side, Booking Holdings and Uber have been losing steam, dragging on recent returns, and HCA Healthcare looks mixed at best. Overall, it’s a U.S.-focused, cash-flow-first strategy with a few laggards tempering otherwise solid momentum.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Booking Holdings | 2.30% | $459.39M | $157.69B | -8.40% | 63 Neutral | |
| Newmont Mining | 2.24% | $448.68M | $134.49B | 85.93% | 81 Outperform | |
| Marathon Petroleum | 2.20% | $439.46M | $100.60B | 111.10% | 66 Neutral | |
| Intuit | 2.18% | $436.85M | $98.98B | -44.62% | 73 Outperform | |
| Bristol-Myers Squibb | 2.11% | $422.26M | $133.74B | 39.84% | 78 Outperform | |
| Gilead Sciences | 2.04% | $408.74M | $177.86B | 27.32% | 78 Outperform | |
| Comcast | 2.00% | $399.27M | $93.75B | -21.38% | 74 Outperform | |
| Salesforce | 1.99% | $397.04M | $168.25B | -15.76% | 80 Outperform | |
| AT&T | 1.97% | $394.94M | $172.34B | -12.10% | 71 Outperform | |
| Uber Technologies | 1.97% | $394.76M | $160.44B | -18.59% | 74 Outperform |
COWZ Technical Analysis
Positive
―
Price Trends
65.77
Positive
64.47
Positive
62.76
Positive
Market Momentum
1.69
Negative
72.66
Negative
82.71
Negative
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For COWZ, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 69.14, equal to the 50-day MA of 65.77, and equal to the 200-day MA of 62.76, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 1.69 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 72.66 is Negative, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 82.71 is Negative, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for COWZ.
COWZ Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
COWZ
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF
72.02
15.46
27.33%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
―
―
―
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
―
―
―
SPY
SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust
―
―
―
QQQ
Invesco QQQ Trust
―
―
―
SPYM
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents