tiprankstipranks
Trending News
More News >
Advertisement

CCOR - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

CCOR

Core Alternative ETF (CCOR)

Rating:73Outperform
Price Target:
CCOR, the Core Alternative ETF, earns a solid overall rating driven mainly by high-quality leaders like Alphabet and Microsoft, whose strong financial performance and growth in AI and cloud services support the fund’s long-term potential. Additional stability and earnings strength from companies like Johnson & Johnson, Walmart, and major banks further bolster the fund, while weaker names such as Air Products and Chemicals, which faces profitability and cash flow challenges, slightly weigh on the rating. A key risk is that several large positions are in similar mega-cap, growth-oriented U.S. companies, which can increase the fund’s sensitivity to shifts in broader market and tech-related sentiment.
Positive Factors
Broad Sector Diversification
The fund spreads its investments across many different sectors, which can help reduce the impact if any one industry struggles.
Strong Performance From Several Top Holdings
Key positions in companies like Johnson & Johnson, Walmart, Emerson Electric, Chevron, and Exxon Mobil have shown strong gains, supporting the ETF’s recent results.
Positive Recent Performance
The ETF has delivered steady gains over the past month, three months, and year to date, indicating solid recent momentum.
Negative Factors
High Expense Ratio
The fund charges a relatively high fee, which can eat into long-term returns compared with lower-cost ETFs.
Heavy U.S. Concentration
With almost all assets invested in U.S. companies, the ETF offers little geographic diversification and is highly tied to the U.S. market.
Mixed Results Among Top Holdings
Some major positions, such as Microsoft and JPMorgan Chase, have shown weak performance this year, which can drag on overall returns if the weakness continues.

CCOR vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

CCOR Summary

The Core Alternative ETF (CCOR) is an actively managed fund that invests mainly in U.S. stocks across many sectors, without tracking a specific index. It aims to give broad market exposure in one fund, holding well-known companies like Microsoft and Alphabet (Google), along with banks, health care, energy, and more. Someone might consider CCOR to get instant diversification across large, mid, and small companies in different industries. A key risk is that its stock holdings can rise or fall with the overall market, and active management plus a higher fee may not always lead to better performance.
How much will it cost me?The Core Alternative ETF (CCOR) has an expense ratio of 1.29%, which means you’ll pay $12.90 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average because it is actively managed, requiring more hands-on decision-making by the fund managers to adapt to market conditions. Active management often comes with higher costs compared to passively managed ETFs that track an index.
What would affect this ETF?The Core Alternative ETF (CCOR) could benefit from growth in the technology sector, which is its largest exposure, as well as strong performance from top holdings like Microsoft and Alphabet if innovation and demand in tech continue to rise. However, potential risks include economic slowdowns or rising interest rates, which could negatively impact financial and consumer cyclical sectors, as well as regulatory changes affecting major holdings like JPMorgan Chase or Chevron. The ETF’s focus on the U.S. market also makes it sensitive to domestic economic conditions and policy shifts.

CCOR Top 10 Holdings

CCOR’s story is about balance with a U.S. tilt: Alphabet is one of the main engines, rising on AI and cloud optimism, while Johnson & Johnson and Walmart add a steady, defensive backbone. Energy names like Chevron and Exxon Mobil are quietly powering ahead, giving the fund a boost when oil sentiment improves. On the other side, Microsoft has been losing a bit of steam lately, and JPMorgan has shown mixed signals, keeping overall returns in check. Sector-wise, technology, financials, and energy sit in the driver’s seat.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Alphabet Class A5.63%$2.00M$3.91T74.20%
85
Outperform
Morgan Stanley4.22%$1.50M$286.01B28.56%
76
Outperform
Johnson & Johnson4.01%$1.43M$578.21B56.73%
78
Outperform
Walmart3.56%$1.27M$1.05T29.69%
78
Outperform
Emerson Electric Company3.42%$1.22M$88.50B26.54%
76
Outperform
Exxon Mobil3.41%$1.21M$628.57B36.88%
74
Outperform
Chevron3.34%$1.19M$364.17B18.50%
71
Outperform
Air Products and Chemicals3.21%$1.14M$63.04B-8.80%
46
Neutral
Chubb3.21%$1.14M$130.25B22.51%
80
Outperform
Microsoft3.16%$1.12M$2.98T-2.10%
79
Outperform

CCOR Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Positive
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
26.67
Positive
100DMA
26.34
Positive
200DMA
26.56
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
0.27
Negative
RSI
75.14
Negative
STOCH
83.58
Negative
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For CCOR, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 27.10, equal to the 50-day MA of 26.67, and equal to the 200-day MA of 26.56, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 0.27 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 75.14 is Negative, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 83.58 is Negative, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for CCOR.

CCOR Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$35.57M1.29%
$99.93M0.66%
$99.26M0.65%
$98.99M0.89%
$92.98M0.85%
$83.36M0.52%
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
CCOR
Core Alternative ETF
27.62
2.21
8.70%
RVER
Trenchless Fund ETF
YALL
God Bless America ETF
BAMD
Brookstone Dividend Stock ETF
STNC
Stance Equity ESG Large Cap Core ETF
RFDA
RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Disclaimer

This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement