tiprankstipranks
Advertisement

CABZ - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

CABZ

Roundhill Robotaxi, Autonomous Vehicles & Technology ETF (CABZ)

Rating:59Neutral
Price Target:
CABZ, the Roundhill Robotaxi, Autonomous Vehicles & Technology ETF, has a moderate overall rating, suggesting a mix of strong leaders and higher-risk names in its portfolio. High-quality holdings like Alphabet and Amazon support the fund with solid financial performance, positive earnings calls, and strong positions in AI and cloud services, which help anchor the ETF’s quality. However, weaker holdings such as Ouster, WeRide, Mobileye, and Aeva face profitability issues, negative cash flows, and bearish technical signals, and the fund’s focus on autonomous vehicle and related technologies means investors are taking on concentrated sector risk.
Positive Factors
Exposure to Leading Tech Names
Holdings like Alphabet, Amazon, and certain sensor technology companies have shown strong recent performance, helping support the ETF’s returns.
Focused Theme in Autonomous Vehicles
The fund targets companies tied to robotaxis and autonomous driving technology, giving investors concentrated exposure to a specific long-term innovation theme.
Recent Short-Term Momentum
The ETF has shown strong gains over the past month, suggesting improving short-term sentiment toward its holdings.
Negative Factors
High Expense Ratio
The fund’s fee is relatively high for an ETF, which can eat into investor returns over time.
Weak Year-to-Date Performance
The ETF is down so far this year, reflecting pressure on many of its core autonomous vehicle and technology holdings.
Concentration in Volatile Names
Several top positions, including Tesla and some smaller autonomous driving and lidar companies, have shown weak or highly volatile performance, increasing risk for investors.

CABZ vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

CABZ Summary

The Roundhill Robotaxi, Autonomous Vehicles & Technology ETF (CABZ) is a theme-based fund focused on the future of self-driving cars and robotaxis. It invests in companies building driverless car technology, including hardware like sensors, software and AI, and ride-hailing platforms that could run robotaxi fleets. Well-known holdings include Tesla, Alphabet (Google), Uber, Amazon, and Baidu. Someone might invest in CABZ if they want growth potential from the long-term shift toward autonomous transportation. However, this ETF is concentrated in a narrow, high-tech theme, so its price can be very volatile and may move sharply up or down.
How much will it cost me?This ETF has an expense ratio of 0.59%, which means you’ll pay about $5.90 per year for every $1,000 you invest. That’s higher than the average ETF because it’s actively managed and focuses on a specialized theme (robotaxis and autonomous vehicles), which typically costs more to run than broad, passive index funds.
What would affect this ETF?This ETF could benefit if self-driving technology keeps improving, big tech and ride-hailing companies like Tesla, Alphabet, Uber, and Amazon successfully roll out robotaxis, and governments support autonomous vehicles with friendly rules and infrastructure, especially across major global markets. On the other hand, it could be hurt by higher interest rates that pressure growth stocks, safety incidents or delays in approvals for autonomous cars, tougher regulations in key countries, or an economic slowdown that reduces consumer and business spending on new mobility services.

CABZ Top 10 Holdings

CABZ is a pure play on the robotaxi and autonomous-driving story, and it shows in the lineup. Big Tech anchors the fund, with Alphabet and Amazon quietly doing the heavy lifting as their shares keep rising and provide a steadier base. Tesla, once the obvious star, is losing steam and has been more of a drag lately, while Uber and Mobileye have delivered mixed to lagging results. On the more speculative side, names like Pony AI and WeRide add punch but also volatility. Overall, it’s a tech- and consumer-focused, globally diversified bet on the future of self-driving mobility.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Tesla8.11%$114.51K$1.47T40.05%
73
Outperform
Alphabet Class A6.72%$94.88K$4.62T133.39%
85
Outperform
Uber Technologies5.34%$75.35K$150.58B-13.46%
74
Outperform
Baidu5.15%$72.76K$43.32B41.24%
64
Neutral
Aurora Innovation4.99%$70.40K$12.63B-24.69%
55
Neutral
Pony AI Inc. Sponsored ADR4.69%$66.25K$4.39B1.96%
49
Neutral
Ouster4.67%$65.91K$1.79B217.53%
45
Neutral
WeRide4.60%$64.96K$2.66B11.53%
45
Neutral
Aeva Technologies4.41%$62.33K$990.17M114.58%
52
Neutral
Amazon4.35%$61.43K$2.93T45.99%
71
Outperform

CABZ Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Positive
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
21.77
Positive
100DMA
200DMA
Market Momentum
MACD
0.55
Negative
RSI
64.26
Neutral
STOCH
92.16
Negative
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For CABZ, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 22.49, equal to the 50-day MA of 21.77, and equal to the 200-day MA of ―, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of 0.55 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 64.26 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 92.16 is Negative, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for CABZ.

CABZ Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$1.41M0.59%
59
Neutral
$99.00M1.00%
69
Neutral
$97.84M0.50%
59
Neutral
$91.69M0.50%
71
Outperform
$81.67M0.90%
59
Neutral
$9.78M0.68%
65
Neutral
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
CABZ
Roundhill Robotaxi, Autonomous Vehicles & Technology ETF
23.67
-1.12
-4.52%
FFND
Future Fund Active ETF
CSNR
Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF
IQM
Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF
HECO
SPDR Galaxy Hedged Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF
MOTO
SmartETFs Smart Transportation & Technology ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement