BILT - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
iShares Infrastructure Active ETF (BILT)
Rating:66Neutral
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Broad Infrastructure Focus
The fund holds a mix of utilities, industrials, energy, and real estate companies, giving investors diversified exposure across key infrastructure areas.
Generally Strong Top Holdings
Most of the largest positions have shown positive performance so far this year, which has supported the ETF’s overall returns.
Global Reach with U.S. Core
While the ETF is anchored in U.S. companies, it also includes meaningful exposure to Europe, Asia, and Australia, adding some international diversification.
Negative Factors
High Utilities Concentration
Nearly half of the portfolio is in utilities, which increases the fund’s sensitivity to sector-specific risks like regulation and interest rate changes.
Moderate Overweight to a Few Names
The top holdings each carry relatively sizable weights, so weakness in any of these companies can have a noticeable impact on the ETF.
Above-Average Expense Ratio
The fund’s fee is on the higher side for an ETF, which can modestly reduce net returns over time compared with lower-cost alternatives.
BILT vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM25.53M
RegionGlobal
Expense Ratio0.60%
Beta0.27
IssueriShares
Inception DateJul 29, 2025
Dividend YieldN/A
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedNo Underlying Index
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume2,474
30 Day Avg. Volume5,056
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
31.11Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering55
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
BILT Summary
The iShares Infrastructure Active ETF (BILT) is an actively managed fund that focuses on global infrastructure companies instead of tracking a fixed index. It mainly holds utilities, industrials, and energy firms that run essential services like power grids, pipelines, roads, and railways. Well-known holdings include Duke Energy and Union Pacific. Investors might consider BILT for diversification and potential long-term growth tied to ongoing spending on infrastructure and clean energy. A key risk is that it is concentrated in infrastructure and utility-related stocks, so its price can swing with changes in interest rates, regulation, and the overall market.
How much will it cost me?The iShares Infrastructure Active ETF (BILT) has an expense ratio of 0.6%, which means you’ll pay $6 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average because it is actively managed, meaning professional managers select investments rather than tracking a preset index.
What would affect this ETF?The iShares Infrastructure Active ETF (BILT) could benefit from increased global infrastructure spending driven by urbanization, technological advancements, and sustainability initiatives, particularly in utilities and industrial sectors. However, rising interest rates or regulatory changes in key regions could negatively impact the fund's performance, especially for companies heavily reliant on debt or facing stricter environmental policies. Its global exposure and focus on essential infrastructure provide diversification but also make it sensitive to varying economic conditions across regions.
BILT Top 10 Holdings
BILT is leaning heavily on classic utilities and infrastructure names, with U.S. power players like NextEra Energy and American Electric Power quietly doing the heavy lifting thanks to steady, rising trends over the past few months. Southern Co and Entergy are also contributing, though recent trading has been a bit choppy as debt and cash flow worries cap enthusiasm. On the transport side, Union Pacific has been more of a weak link lately, losing steam in the short term. With holdings spread across the U.S., Europe, and Australia, this is a global infrastructure story, but very much anchored in regulated utilities.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aena SA | 4.91% | $1.22M | €39.24B | 31.66% | 80 Outperform | |
| Union Pacific | 4.55% | $1.13M | $146.04B | 18.17% | 72 Outperform | |
| Southern Co | 4.38% | $1.09M | $108.38B | 11.47% | 68 Neutral | |
| American Electric Power | 4.12% | $1.03M | $71.89B | 31.24% | 69 Neutral | |
| Entergy | 3.70% | $922.78K | $51.58B | 44.12% | 66 Neutral | |
| NextEra Energy | 3.44% | $858.36K | $195.16B | 46.11% | 71 Outperform | |
| Xcel Energy | 3.31% | $824.09K | $50.25B | 20.14% | 61 Neutral | |
| Transurban Group | 3.22% | $801.33K | AU$42.72B | 20.20% | 52 Neutral | |
| Williams Co | 3.15% | $784.67K | $90.54B | 36.28% | 76 Outperform | |
| Crown Castle | 2.86% | $713.27K | $37.03B | -10.46% | 45 Neutral |
BILT Technical Analysis
Positive
―
Price Trends
28.43
Positive
27.13
Positive
Market Momentum
0.12
Negative
63.26
Neutral
95.88
Negative
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For BILT, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 28.60, equal to the 50-day MA of 28.43, and equal to the 200-day MA of ―, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of 0.12 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 63.26 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 95.88 is Negative, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for BILT.
BILT Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
BILT
iShares Infrastructure Active ETF
29.08
4.13
16.55%
TCAI
Tortoise AI Infrastructure ETF
―
―
―
GLIX
Lazard Listed Infrastructure ETF
―
―
―
BILD
Macquarie Global Listed Infrastructure ETF
―
―
―
IQRA
IQ CBRE Real Assets ETF
―
―
―
GARA
Guinness Atkinson Real Assets Income ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents