GARA - ETF AI Analysis

Top Page

Guinness Atkinson Real Assets Income ETF (GARA)

Rating:60Neutral

Price Target:―

GARA, the Guinness Atkinson Real Assets Income ETF, has a solid but not top-tier rating, largely supported by strong holdings like Aena SA and National Grid, which show robust financial performance, reasonable valuations, and supportive technical trends. Other contributors such as Primary Health Properties and Brookfield Infrastructure add stability and income potential, though concerns like high leverage, very high or rich valuations, and some bearish or overbought technical signals in several holdings introduce risk. Overall, the main risk factor is that many core holdings face valuation and leverage pressures, which could limit upside or increase volatility despite their generally strong fundamentals.

Positive Factors

Strong Geographic Diversification

The ETF invests across multiple countries, reducing reliance on any single economy and spreading risk globally.

Focus on Defensive Sectors

With significant exposure to utilities and real estate, the fund is positioned in traditionally stable, income-generating sectors.

Moderate Expense Ratio

The ETF charges a reasonable expense ratio, making it cost-effective compared to many actively managed funds.

Negative Factors

Small Asset Base

The fund has relatively low assets under management, which could lead to less liquidity and higher trading costs for investors.

Overweight in Utilities

The heavy allocation to utilities, at over 40%, makes the fund vulnerable to sector-specific risks.

Mixed Performance of Top Holdings

Some of the largest holdings have shown inconsistent performance, which could impact the fund’s overall returns.

GARA vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

AUM397.07K

RegionGlobal

Expense Ratio0.45%

Beta0.18

IssuerGuinness Atkinson

Inception DateDec 19, 2025

Dividend YieldN/A

Asset ClassEquity

Index TrackedNo Underlying Index

Share Statistics

EPS (TTM)N/A

Shares OutstandingN/A

10 Day Avg. Volume43

30 Day Avg. Volume579

Financial Highlights & Ratios

PEG RatioN/A

Price to Book (P/B)N/A

Price to Sales (P/S)N/A

P/FCF RatioN/A

Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A

Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A

Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A

Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A

Forecast

1Y Price Target

29.42

Price Target Upside― Downside

Rating ConsensusModerate Buy

Number of Analyst Covering33

EPS Forecast (FY)N/A

Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A

GARA Summary

The Guinness Atkinson Real Assets Income ETF (GARA) is an investment fund focused on companies involved in global infrastructure and real estate. It includes businesses like Engie SA and Prologis, which are key players in utilities and real estate. This ETF is designed for investors who want exposure to essential industries that support economic growth, offering diversification across sectors like utilities and real estate. However, since it focuses heavily on infrastructure, its performance can be affected by changes in government policies or economic conditions impacting these industries.

How much will it cost me?The Guinness Atkinson Real Assets Income ETF (GARA) has an expense ratio of 0.45%, which means you’ll pay $4.50 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is slightly higher than the average for passively managed ETFs because GARA is actively managed, focusing on a niche area like infrastructure, which requires more research and oversight.

What would affect this ETF?The Guinness Atkinson Real Assets Income ETF (GARA) could benefit from increased global infrastructure spending, driven by government initiatives and the growing demand for renewable energy and technological advancements. However, it may face challenges from rising interest rates, which can negatively impact REITs and infrastructure stocks, as well as potential regulatory changes in the utilities and energy sectors. Its global exposure provides diversification, but it also makes the ETF sensitive to geopolitical risks and economic slowdowns in key regions.

GARA Top 10 Holdings

GARA is leaning hard into global infrastructure, with a clear tilt toward utilities and REITs that throw off steady income. European names like Engie and National Grid are doing much of the heavy lifting, rising on solid cash flows and regulated business models. Aena is another bright spot, benefiting from resilient travel demand. On the REIT side, Primary Health Properties looks steady to rising, while Ventas is more mixed, with growth hopes offset by valuation worries. Brookfield Infrastructure adds a global flavor but its rich price tag can occasionally weigh on sentiment.

Name	Company Name	Weight %	Market Value	Market Cap	Yearly Gain	Overall Rating
ENGI	Engie SA	3.55%	$14.24K	€62.96B	61.19%	64 Neutral
	―	3.24%	$12.97K	―	―	―
PHP	Primary Health Properties plc R.E.I.T	3.14%	$12.58K	£2.74B	14.67%	74 Outperform
NG	National Grid	3.12%	$12.53K	£63.53B	28.86%	76 Outperform
AENA	Aena SA	3.07%	$12.30K	€40.48B	28.13%	80 Outperform
SVT	Severn Trent	3.01%	$12.06K	£9.04B	18.72%	71 Outperform
PLD	Prologis	2.96%	$11.87K	$128.22B	13.52%	76 Outperform
VTR	Ventas	2.95%	$11.81K	$37.41B	27.72%	68 Neutral
	―	2.94%	$11.79K	―	―	―
BIP.UN	Brookfield Infrastructure	2.93%	$11.75K	C$23.22B	11.39%	69 Neutral

GARA Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment

Positive

Last Price―

Price Trends

50DMA

100DMA

200DMA

Market Momentum

MACD

0.39

Negative

RSI

72.13

Negative

STOCH

82.49

Negative

Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For GARA, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 26.08, equal to the 50-day MA of ―, and equal to the 200-day MA of ―, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of 0.39 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 72.13 is Negative, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 82.49 is Negative, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for GARA.

GARA Peer Comparison

Comparison Results

Name	Price	Price Target	AUM	Expense Ratio	Overall Rating
GARA	―	―	$397.07K	0.45%	―
TCAI	―	―	$62.51M	0.65%	―
BILT	―	―	$20.63M	0.60%	―
GLIX	―	―	$20.33M	0.96%	―
BILD	―	―	$6.59M	0.50%	―
IQRA	―	―	$6.51M	0.65%	―

Performance Comparison

GARA

Guinness Atkinson Real Assets Income ETF

26.77

1.48

5.85%

TCAI

Tortoise AI Infrastructure ETF

―

BILT

iShares Infrastructure Active ETF

―

GLIX

Lazard Listed Infrastructure ETF

―

BILD

Macquarie Global Listed Infrastructure ETF

―

IQRA

IQ CBRE Real Assets ETF

―

Glossary

BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Disclaimer

This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―

Table of Contents