ANEW - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF (ANEW)
Rating:64Neutral
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Strong Leading Holdings
Several of the largest positions, including well-known technology and industrial names, have shown strong gains this year, helping support the fund’s results.
Diversified Growth Sectors
The ETF spreads its investments across health care, technology, communication services, and consumer sectors, which can benefit from long-term transformational trends while reducing reliance on any single industry.
Global, But U.S.-Focused Exposure
While most assets are in U.S. companies, the fund also holds stocks from several other countries, adding some international diversification.
Negative Factors
Recent Weak Overall Performance
Despite some strong individual stocks, the ETF’s returns over the year to date and recent three-month period have been weak, which may concern performance-focused investors.
Moderate Expense Ratio
The fund’s fee is not especially low, so costs may eat into returns more than with some cheaper index ETFs.
Small Asset Base
With relatively low assets under management, the ETF may face higher trading spreads and a greater risk of closure compared with larger, more established funds.
ANEW vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM7.66M
RegionGlobal
Expense Ratio0.45%
Beta0.94
IssuerProShares
Inception DateOct 14, 2020
Dividend Yield0.63%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedMSCI Global Transformational Changes Index
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume148
30 Day Avg. Volume169
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
61.29Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering140
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
ANEW Summary
The ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF (ANEW) tracks the MSCI Global Transformational Changes Index, focusing on big long-term trends like new technology, aging populations, and cleaner energy. It holds a mix of U.S. and global companies across health care, technology, and communication services. Well-known names include Alphabet (Google’s parent company) and Meta Platforms (Facebook). Investors might consider ANEW for growth potential and diversification across several future-focused themes in one fund. A key risk is that these “change-driven” companies can be more volatile, so the ETF’s price can go up and down more than the overall market.
How much will it cost me?The ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF (Ticker: ANEW) has an expense ratio of 0.45%, which means you’ll pay $4.50 per year for every $1,000 invested. This expense ratio is slightly higher than average because the fund is actively managed to focus on companies driving transformational changes across industries, requiring more research and specialized management.
What would affect this ETF?The ANEW ETF could benefit from continued advancements in technology, healthcare innovation, and global adoption of clean energy solutions, as these sectors are heavily represented in its holdings. However, it may face challenges from rising interest rates, which can impact growth-focused companies, and regulatory changes in key markets like China, where some top holdings are based. Global economic uncertainty could also affect consumer spending and corporate investments in transformational industries.
ANEW Top 10 Holdings
ANEW leans heavily into global tech and healthcare, with U.S. giants like Alphabet, Amazon, Nvidia, Broadcom, and Cadence doing most of the heavy lifting. The AI and cloud theme is clearly in the driver’s seat, as these names have been rising or staying solid, giving the fund a strong growth engine. On the flip side, more traditional players like Deere and Nutrien have been lagging, acting as a bit of a brake. Overall, it’s a future-focused, globally diversified portfolio with a clear tilt toward innovative U.S. leaders.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Givaudan SA | 2.22% | $168.69K | CHF29.51B | -22.41% | 69 Neutral | |
| Eli Lilly & Co | 2.15% | $163.88K | $1.06T | 41.86% | 72 Outperform | |
| DoorDash | 2.14% | $162.89K | $73.24B | -22.50% | 76 Outperform | |
| Symrise | 2.12% | $161.19K | €11.49B | -16.54% | 63 Neutral | |
| Danaher | 2.11% | $160.86K | $128.18B | -7.36% | 75 Outperform | |
| International Flavors & Fragrances | 2.10% | $160.22K | $20.01B | 3.76% | 61 Neutral | |
| Deere | 2.05% | $156.27K | $155.34B | 11.88% | 66 Neutral | |
| AbbVie | 2.03% | $154.17K | $391.50B | 19.94% | 66 Neutral | |
| Abbott Laboratories | 1.99% | $151.15K | $154.45B | -31.49% | 73 Outperform | |
| Apple | 1.95% | $148.42K | $4.35T | 52.95% | 79 Outperform |
ANEW Technical Analysis
Neutral
―
Price Trends
49.45
Positive
48.71
Positive
49.86
Positive
Market Momentum
0.23
Positive
48.12
Neutral
48.37
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For ANEW, the sentiment is Neutral. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 50.67, equal to the 50-day MA of 49.45, and equal to the 200-day MA of 49.86, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of 0.23 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 48.12 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 48.37 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Neutral sentiment for ANEW.
ANEW Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
ANEW
ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF
49.99
1.56
3.22%
CSNR
Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF
―
―
―
IBLC
iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF
―
―
―
AIVC
Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF
―
―
―
NXTE
AXS Green Alpha ETF
―
―
―
DARP
Grizzle Growth Etf
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents