tiprankstipranks
Advertisement

AMZA - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

AMZA

InfraCap MLP ETF (AMZA)

Rating:84Outperform
Price Target:
AMZA, the InfraCap MLP ETF, has a solid overall rating driven mainly by large positions in strong midstream names like MPLX, Western Midstream Partners, and Plains All American, which benefit from robust financial performance, attractive valuations, and high dividend yields. Holdings such as Energy Transfer and Sunoco also add income appeal, though some names like Cheniere Energy Partners introduce risk with high leverage and weaker trends. The fund is heavily concentrated in energy midstream MLPs, so its performance is closely tied to the health and stability of the energy infrastructure sector.
Positive Factors
Strong Year-to-Date Performance
The ETF has delivered solid gains so far this year, indicating that its strategy has recently been working well for investors.
Leading Energy MLP Holdings
Many of the largest positions, such as Energy Transfer, Plains All American, and Sunoco, have shown strong year-to-date performance, helping drive the fund’s returns.
Focused Exposure to Energy Infrastructure
The ETF concentrates on energy and midstream infrastructure companies, giving investors targeted access to a specific income-oriented segment of the market.
Negative Factors
High Expense Ratio
The fund charges a relatively high fee, which can eat into long-term returns compared with lower-cost ETFs.
Sector Concentration in Energy
With almost all assets in the energy sector, the ETF is highly sensitive to swings in energy prices and industry-specific risks.
Limited Geographic Diversification
The portfolio is overwhelmingly invested in U.S. companies, offering little protection if the U.S. energy market faces a downturn.

AMZA vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

AMZA Summary

InfraCap MLP ETF (AMZA) is an actively managed fund that focuses on energy Master Limited Partnerships (MLPs), mainly in the U.S. These are companies that move, store, and process oil and gas, rather than drill for it. The fund holds well-known names like Energy Transfer and Enterprise Products Partners. Investors might consider AMZA for its focus on income and potential growth from the energy infrastructure sector, plus diversification within energy. However, it is heavily concentrated in energy MLPs, so its price and payouts can swing a lot with energy prices, regulations, and overall market conditions.
How much will it cost me?This ETF has an expense ratio of 1.72%, which means you’ll pay about $17 per year for every $1,000 invested. That’s higher than the average ETF because it’s actively managed and focuses on a specialized niche of energy MLPs, which typically costs more to run than broad, passive index funds.
What would affect this ETF?AMZA could benefit if U.S. energy demand and oil and gas production stay strong, since its midstream MLP holdings like Energy Transfer and Enterprise Products Partners earn fees from transporting and storing energy, and supportive energy regulations or stable interest rates can also help income-focused investors. On the other hand, weaker energy prices, stricter environmental rules, higher interest rates that make its high yield less attractive, or company-specific problems at its largest holdings could hurt the fund’s performance.

AMZA Top 10 Holdings

AMZA is essentially a U.S. midstream energy income play, with the fund heavily anchored in a handful of big MLPs rather than spread thin across sectors. Energy Transfer, Enterprise Products Partners, and Plains All American are the steady engines, showing generally rising trends over the past few months and helping keep performance on track. Sunoco and Targa Resources add extra spark with stronger recent momentum, while MPLX and Western Midstream have been more mixed and occasionally lagging, acting like a bit of drag on an otherwise firmly energy-focused portfolio.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Energy Transfer16.36%$73.82M$64.37B9.26%
70
Outperform
Plains All American14.74%$66.50M$15.21B21.31%
79
Outperform
Sunoco13.92%$62.79M$12.96B12.79%
72
Outperform
Enterprise Products Partners12.81%$57.80M$80.20B20.34%
73
Outperform
MPLX12.29%$55.46M$55.60B9.23%
81
Outperform
Western Midstream Partners11.18%$50.44M$15.91B7.13%
80
Outperform
Hess Midstream Partners4.97%$22.43M$7.74B0.67%
77
Outperform
Williams Co3.40%$15.35M$86.53B20.88%
76
Outperform
Targa Resources3.13%$14.11M$51.28B37.37%
74
Outperform
Cheniere Energy Partners3.08%$13.88M$29.82B0.64%
61
Neutral

AMZA Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Positive
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
45.25
Positive
100DMA
42.67
Positive
200DMA
40.69
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
0.48
Negative
RSI
60.47
Neutral
STOCH
87.90
Negative
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For AMZA, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 45.36, equal to the 50-day MA of 45.25, and equal to the 200-day MA of 40.69, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 0.48 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 60.47 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 87.90 is Negative, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for AMZA.

AMZA Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$463.85M1.72%
84
Outperform
$772.21M0.18%
74
Outperform
$666.64M0.65%
72
Outperform
$637.81M0.65%
70
Outperform
$606.12M0.65%
58
Neutral
$578.44M1.03%
74
Outperform
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
AMZA
InfraCap MLP ETF
46.83
9.70
26.12%
IETC
iShares Evolved US Technology ETF
GTOP
Goldman Sachs Technology Opportunities ETF
FEPI
REX FANG & Innovation Equity Premium Income ETF
SAMT
Strategas Macro Thematic Opportunities ETF
CHPY
YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement