tiprankstipranks
Trending News
More News >
Advertisement

USMC - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

USMC

Principal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF (USMC)

Rating:74Outperform
Price Target:
USMC, the Principal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF, earns a solid overall rating because it is heavily invested in dominant technology leaders like Alphabet, Apple, Microsoft, and Nvidia, which all show strong financial performance, positive earnings commentary, and promising growth in areas like AI, cloud, and services. These strengths are partly offset by holdings such as AbbVie, Visa, and Costco, where high valuations, some financial or technical concerns, and company-specific challenges temper the outlook. The main risk is the fund’s concentration in a handful of large U.S. mega-cap names and tech-related growth themes, which can make performance more sensitive to shifts in sentiment toward these sectors.
Positive Factors
Low Expense Ratio
The fund charges relatively low fees, which helps investors keep more of their returns over time.
Exposure to Leading Mega-Cap Companies
The ETF holds many of the largest and most established U.S. companies, which can provide stability and strong business fundamentals.
Broad Sector Diversification
Holdings spread across technology, financials, communication services, consumer sectors, health care, and energy help reduce the impact if one industry struggles.
Negative Factors
Recent Weak Performance
The ETF has shown negative returns over the past month, three months, and year to date, which may concern investors looking for near-term strength.
Concentration in a Few Large Stocks
A significant portion of the fund is invested in a small group of mega-cap names, so poor results from these companies could weigh heavily on the ETF.
Heavy U.S.-Only Exposure
With almost all assets in U.S. companies, the fund offers little geographic diversification and is highly tied to the U.S. market’s fortunes.

USMC vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

USMC Summary

The Principal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF (USMC) focuses on the biggest and most established U.S. companies, aiming to give investors broad exposure to America’s corporate giants rather than tracking a specific index. It holds well-known names like Apple, Microsoft, Nvidia, and JPMorgan Chase, spread across technology, finance, health care, and consumer sectors. Someone might invest in this ETF to seek long-term growth and stability from leading blue-chip companies while getting diversification in a single fund. A key risk is that it is heavily tilted toward large U.S. stocks, especially tech, so its value can rise and fall with that part of the market.
How much will it cost me?The Principal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF (USMC) has an expense ratio of 0.12%, meaning you’ll pay $1.20 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is lower than average because it’s passively managed, focusing on tracking large-cap stocks rather than actively picking investments.
What would affect this ETF?The Principal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF (USMC) could benefit from continued growth in the technology sector, which makes up a significant portion of its holdings, as well as strong consumer spending and innovation from companies like Apple and Nvidia. However, it may face challenges if interest rates rise, potentially impacting financial stocks, or if regulatory scrutiny increases for major tech firms like Microsoft and Alphabet. Economic conditions in the U.S., where the ETF is focused, will also play a key role in its performance.

USMC Top 10 Holdings

USMC is leaning heavily on U.S. mega-cap tech, with Nvidia and Apple doing much of the heavy lifting lately as AI enthusiasm and steady device and services demand keep them rising. Alphabet is more of a mixed story, wobbling in the short term but still contributing over the longer stretch. On the other side, Microsoft and Tesla are losing steam, acting as mild brakes on performance rather than engines. Rounding things out, Exxon Mobil and Costco add a sturdy, non-tech backbone, giving this all‑U.S. fund some balance beyond its Big Tech core.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Nvidia7.85%$241.77M$4.46T65.81%
76
Outperform
Apple6.90%$212.40M$3.82T10.61%
79
Outperform
Alphabet Class A5.60%$172.33M$3.64T74.57%
85
Outperform
Microsoft5.30%$163.09M$3.05T3.47%
79
Outperform
Exxon Mobil4.84%$149.11M$628.18B40.08%
74
Outperform
Costco4.78%$147.35M$436.13B-4.29%
72
Outperform
JPMorgan Chase4.60%$141.54M$791.71B19.07%
72
Outperform
Tesla4.29%$132.23M$1.52T53.94%
73
Outperform
Visa4.17%$128.47M$609.54B-7.08%
70
Outperform
AbbVie4.03%$124.18M$410.83B10.25%
66
Neutral

USMC Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Negative
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
67.75
Negative
100DMA
67.96
Negative
200DMA
65.72
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
-0.20
Negative
RSI
47.75
Neutral
STOCH
77.37
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For USMC, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 67.01, equal to the 50-day MA of 67.75, and equal to the 200-day MA of 65.72, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of -0.20 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 47.75 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 77.37 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for USMC.

USMC Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$3.38B0.12%
74
Outperform
$8.90B0.68%
75
Outperform
$8.01B0.68%
74
Outperform
$6.62B0.56%
70
Neutral
$6.60B0.18%
74
Outperform
$6.39B0.31%
71
Outperform
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
USMC
Principal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF
66.52
8.88
15.41%
QQQI
NEOS Nasdaq 100 High Income ETF
SPYI
NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF
DIVO
Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF
FELC
Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Core ETF
TCAF
T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Disclaimer

This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement