tiprankstipranks
Advertisement

USMC - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

USMC

Principal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF (USMC)

Rating:74Outperform
Price Target:
USMC, the Principal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF, earns a solid overall rating largely because it is built around high-quality leaders like Alphabet, Apple, Microsoft, and Nvidia, which all show strong financial performance, positive earnings commentary, and promising growth in areas like AI, cloud, and services. Some holdings such as Costco, Visa, and Netflix face bearish technical trends or rich valuations, which slightly weigh on the fund’s rating. The main risk is that many of its biggest positions are expensive and exposed to similar themes like AI and U.S. mega-cap growth, so a downturn in these areas could impact the ETF more sharply.
Positive Factors
Leading Mega-Cap Holdings
The ETF is built around many of the largest and most established U.S. companies, several of which have shown strong recent performance and help support the fund’s returns.
Sector Diversification Across the U.S. Economy
Holdings spread across technology, financials, communication services, consumer sectors, health care, and more help reduce the impact if any one industry struggles.
Low Expense Ratio
The fund’s relatively low annual fee means less of your return is eaten up by costs compared with many actively managed alternatives.
Negative Factors
Heavy U.S.-Only Exposure
With almost all assets in U.S. stocks, the ETF offers little protection if the U.S. market underperforms other regions.
Concentration in a Handful of Tech and Financial Giants
A significant portion of the portfolio is tied up in a small group of large technology and financial stocks, which increases the impact if those specific companies or sectors decline.
Mixed Performance Among Top Holdings
While some major positions have been strong performers, others have recently lagged, which can create uneven results for the fund.

USMC vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

USMC Summary

The Principal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF (USMC) invests in many of the biggest and most powerful U.S. companies, aiming to capture the strength of mega-cap stocks across the market. It doesn’t track a specific index, but follows a large-cap, broad-based theme with heavy exposure to technology, finance, and communication services. Well-known holdings include Apple, Microsoft, Nvidia, and JPMorgan Chase. Someone might invest in this ETF for long-term growth and diversification in leading U.S. businesses. A key risk is that it is heavily tilted toward large tech-related companies, so its value can rise and fall sharply with that part of the market.
How much will it cost me?The Principal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF (USMC) has an expense ratio of 0.12%, meaning you’ll pay $1.20 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is lower than average because it’s passively managed, focusing on tracking large-cap stocks rather than actively picking investments.
What would affect this ETF?The Principal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF (USMC) could benefit from continued growth in the technology sector, which makes up a significant portion of its holdings, as well as strong consumer spending and innovation from companies like Apple and Nvidia. However, it may face challenges if interest rates rise, potentially impacting financial stocks, or if regulatory scrutiny increases for major tech firms like Microsoft and Alphabet. Economic conditions in the U.S., where the ETF is focused, will also play a key role in its performance.

USMC Top 10 Holdings

USMC is riding a powerful U.S. mega-cap wave, with Nvidia and Broadcom doing much of the heavy lifting as AI-focused chip demand keeps their shares rising. Big Tech remains the fund’s heartbeat: Alphabet and Meta are adding steady fuel, while Apple is perking up after a softer stretch. Microsoft and Mastercard, however, look more like brakes than engines lately, with performance still mixed to lagging. With all holdings rooted in the U.S. and heavily tilted toward technology and communication services, the fund’s fortunes are closely tied to America’s biggest digital powerhouses.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Nvidia7.88%$255.87M$4.82T74.38%
76
Outperform
Apple6.68%$217.02M$4.06T39.19%
79
Outperform
Alphabet Class A6.55%$212.73M$4.62T133.39%
85
Outperform
Broadcom5.54%$180.10M$1.97T107.50%
76
Outperform
Microsoft5.02%$163.09M$3.07T-5.17%
79
Outperform
Micron4.60%$149.56M$650.08B616.80%
79
Outperform
JPMorgan Chase4.36%$141.56M$824.35B21.81%
72
Outperform
Visa4.34%$141.08M$615.83B-6.25%
70
Outperform
Amazon4.32%$140.40M$2.93T45.99%
71
Outperform
Costco4.26%$138.45M$449.33B-0.21%
72
Outperform

USMC Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Positive
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
66.84
Positive
100DMA
67.34
Positive
200DMA
66.84
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
1.14
Negative
RSI
67.78
Neutral
STOCH
80.79
Negative
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For USMC, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 68.84, equal to the 50-day MA of 66.84, and equal to the 200-day MA of 66.84, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 1.14 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 67.78 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 80.79 is Negative, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for USMC.

USMC Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$3.26B0.12%
74
Outperform
$9.21B0.68%
74
Outperform
$7.09B0.18%
74
Outperform
$6.96B0.56%
70
Neutral
$6.91B0.31%
71
Outperform
$4.36B0.75%
73
Outperform
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
USMC
Principal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF
70.37
13.47
23.67%
SPYI
NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF
FELC
Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Core ETF
DIVO
Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF
TCAF
T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF
GRNY
Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement