tiprankstipranks
Advertisement

UPGD - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

UPGD

Invesco Raymond James Sb-1 Equity Etf (UPGD)

Rating:71Outperform
Price Target:
UPGD’s rating suggests it is a solid but not top-tier ETF, supported by strong core holdings like Caterpillar and NetApp, which benefit from healthy financial performance, positive earnings sentiment, and strategic focus on growth areas such as AI and high-margin segments. The fund is somewhat held back by weaker names like Super Micro Computer and Cloudflare, where profitability, revenue, and cash flow challenges, along with bearish or weak momentum, introduce more risk. Overall, the main risk factor is its exposure to several companies facing valuation concerns and profitability pressures, which could add volatility even as the broader portfolio remains reasonably well diversified across industries.
Positive Factors
Strong Year-to-Date Performance
The ETF has delivered solid gains so far this year, showing positive momentum for investors.
Leading Holdings with Strong Gains
Several of the largest positions, including Intel and other top names, have posted strong year-to-date performance, helping drive the fund’s returns.
Diversified Sector Mix
Holdings spread across industrials, technology, consumer cyclical, consumer defensive, health care, and utilities help reduce the impact of weakness in any single sector.
Negative Factors
High U.S. Concentration
With almost all assets invested in U.S. companies, the fund offers little geographic diversification and is heavily tied to the U.S. market.
Moderate Expense Ratio
The fund’s expense ratio is not especially low, meaning fees may take a noticeable bite out of long-term returns compared with cheaper ETFs.
Exposure to a Weak Top Holding
One of the larger positions, Palantir Technologies, has shown weak year-to-date performance, which can drag on overall fund results if the stock continues to lag.

UPGD vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

UPGD Summary

The Invesco Raymond James SB-1 Equity ETF (UPGD) tracks the Bloomberg ANR Improvers Index, aiming to invest in U.S. companies that analysts at Raymond James rate as strong buys. It holds a mix of large, mid, and small companies across many sectors, with a tilt toward industrials and technology. Well-known holdings include Intel and Airbnb. An investor might choose this ETF for broad diversification across the U.S. stock market with a focus on companies expected to grow. However, it is still a stock-focused fund, so its value can go up and down with the overall market.
How much will it cost me?The expense ratio for the Invesco Raymond James SB-1 Equity ETF (UPGD) is 0.4%, which means you’ll pay $4 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is slightly higher than average because the fund is actively managed, focusing on equities with strong growth potential and solid fundamentals. It reflects the additional costs of expert insights and strategic stock selection.
What would affect this ETF?The UPGD ETF, with its focus on U.S. equities across multiple sectors, could benefit from economic growth and technological advancements, particularly in its top-weighted sectors like Industrials and Technology. However, it may face challenges from rising interest rates, which can impact growth-focused companies, and sector-specific risks such as regulatory changes in Technology or Consumer Cyclical industries. Its broad exposure provides diversification but also makes it sensitive to overall market volatility.

UPGD Top 10 Holdings

UPGD leans heavily into U.S. industrials and tech, with names like Caterpillar and Cummins giving the fund a steady, blue-collar backbone while Intel and NetApp provide the high-tech spark. Intel has been rising and looks like a key engine for recent gains, while NetApp and Zoom add momentum from cloud and communication trends. Super Micro Computer is more of a wild card, with mixed signals despite AI buzz. On the consumer side, Airbnb has been lagging a bit, keeping the fund from fully hitting its stride.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
NetApp2.63%$3.09M$31.44B60.82%
76
Outperform
Williams-Sonoma2.37%$2.78M$25.76B45.19%
75
Outperform
Old Dominion Freight2.30%$2.70M$51.53B53.42%
71
Outperform
PPG Industries2.21%$2.59M$26.36B12.27%
67
Neutral
Rivian Automotive2.21%$2.59M$19.59B24.89%
61
Neutral
International Paper Co2.21%$2.59M$18.51B-21.22%
49
Neutral
The Estée Lauder Companies2.19%$2.58M$31.85B33.23%
56
Neutral
Ford Motor2.17%$2.55M$58.61B42.28%
71
Outperform
Incyte2.17%$2.54M$21.54B60.19%
81
Outperform
Dollar General2.13%$2.50M$25.22B2.79%
73
Outperform

UPGD Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Positive
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
78.10
Positive
100DMA
77.28
Positive
200DMA
75.49
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
1.04
Positive
RSI
61.32
Neutral
STOCH
68.90
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For UPGD, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 80.33, equal to the 50-day MA of 78.10, and equal to the 200-day MA of 75.49, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 1.04 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 61.32 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 68.90 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for UPGD.

UPGD Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$117.56M0.40%
71
Outperform
$938.17M0.59%
68
Neutral
$893.81M0.50%
76
Outperform
$879.83M0.15%
73
Outperform
$878.21M1.30%
65
Neutral
$854.32M0.27%
71
Outperform
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
UPGD
Invesco Raymond James Sb-1 Equity Etf
81.90
13.08
19.01%
SYLD
Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF
HLAL
Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF
FDMO
Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF
ULTY
YieldMax Ultra Option Income Strategy ETF
AUSF
Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement