tiprankstipranks
Trending News
More News >
Advertisement

SPUS - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

SPUS

SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF (SPUS)

Rating:75Outperform
Price Target:
SPUS, the SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF, earns a solid overall rating largely because its biggest positions in high-quality tech leaders like Apple, Microsoft, and Alphabet show strong financial performance, positive earnings outlooks, and promising growth in areas like cloud and AI. Nvidia and Broadcom also support the rating with their AI-driven growth, though their high valuations add some risk, and holdings like Tesla and Eli Lilly introduce additional caution due to valuation and leverage concerns. The main risk factor is the fund’s heavy concentration in a handful of large technology and AI-focused companies, which can increase volatility if that sector faces a downturn.
Positive Factors
Large, Established U.S. Companies
The fund is almost entirely invested in major U.S. companies, giving investors exposure to many well-known, financially solid businesses.
Strong Technology Focus
With over half of the portfolio in technology and several leading chip and software companies among the top holdings, the ETF is positioned to benefit when the tech sector performs well.
Healthy Fund Size
The ETF manages a sizable pool of assets, which can support trading liquidity and help keep the fund operating efficiently.
Negative Factors
High Concentration in a Few Stocks
A small number of large tech names make up a big share of the portfolio, so weakness in these companies can significantly drag on the fund.
Recent Performance Softness
The ETF’s returns have been slightly negative so far this year and over the past month, showing some recent performance weakness.
Above-Average Expense Ratio
The fund’s fee is higher than many broad U.S. stock index ETFs, which means more of the gross return is lost to costs over time.

SPUS vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

SPUS Summary

SPUS is an ETF that tracks the S&P 500 Shariah Industry Exclusions Index, giving you exposure to large U.S. companies while avoiding businesses involved in things like alcohol, gambling, and traditional banks. It is heavily invested in technology and holds well-known names such as Apple and Nvidia, along with other major U.S. corporations. Someone might consider SPUS to seek long-term growth from leading American companies while following Islamic or broader ethical investing principles. A key risk is that it is very concentrated in tech stocks, so its price can rise and fall sharply with the tech sector and overall market.
How much will it cost me?The SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF (SPUS) has an expense ratio of 0.45%, meaning you’ll pay $4.50 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is slightly higher than average because it is actively managed to ensure compliance with Sharia principles, which requires additional screening and oversight. Despite the higher cost, it may appeal to investors seeking ethical and faith-based investment options.
What would affect this ETF?The SPUS ETF, with its focus on U.S. large-cap stocks and heavy exposure to technology, could benefit from continued innovation and growth in the tech sector, as well as strong performance from top holdings like Nvidia and Microsoft. However, it may face challenges if regulatory scrutiny increases on major tech companies or if economic conditions lead to reduced consumer spending, which could impact sectors like Consumer Cyclical. Additionally, its Sharia-compliant nature limits diversification, excluding industries like financial services, which could affect resilience during market downturns.

SPUS Top 10 Holdings

SPUS is heavily hitched to U.S. Big Tech and chip makers, and that tech tilt is a double-edged sword right now. Nvidia and Broadcom, once powerful engines, are losing a bit of thrust, while Microsoft and Apple are also lagging and no longer carrying the fund the way they used to. Alphabet is one of the few tech names still rising, and Micron has been a standout bright spot. Outside tech, steady gains from Eli Lilly, Exxon Mobil, and Johnson & Johnson help smooth the ride, but this is still very much a U.S. tech-driven story.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Nvidia13.99%$287.37M$4.62T43.10%
76
Outperform
Apple12.29%$252.52M$4.03T18.06%
79
Outperform
Microsoft9.31%$191.26M$3.07T0.52%
79
Outperform
Alphabet Class A5.72%$117.40M$3.92T76.64%
85
Outperform
Broadcom4.92%$101.06M$1.63T45.52%
76
Outperform
Tesla3.55%$72.96M$1.57T27.04%
73
Outperform
Eli Lilly & Co2.52%$51.68M$987.61B19.67%
72
Outperform
Exxon Mobil1.93%$39.67M$637.68B40.86%
74
Outperform
Johnson & Johnson1.74%$35.76M$574.95B53.70%
78
Outperform
Micron1.30%$26.78M$431.63B318.30%
79
Outperform

SPUS Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Positive
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
51.29
Positive
100DMA
50.63
Positive
200DMA
47.32
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
>-0.01
Positive
RSI
54.92
Neutral
STOCH
46.79
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For SPUS, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 51.39, equal to the 50-day MA of 51.29, and equal to the 200-day MA of 47.32, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of >-0.01 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 54.92 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 46.79 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for SPUS.

SPUS Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$2.04B0.45%
$9.52B0.05%
$9.11B0.34%
$8.49B0.52%
$8.40B0.68%
$8.24B0.61%
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
SPUS
SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF
51.85
8.25
18.92%
MGC
Vanguard Mega Cap ETF
PRF
Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1000 ETF
FTCS
First Trust Capital Strength ETF
QQQI
NEOS Nasdaq 100 High Income ETF
QYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Disclaimer

This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement