SPAM - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
Themes Cybersecurity ETF (SPAM)
Rating:64Neutral
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Leading Cybersecurity Focus
The fund is concentrated in well-known cybersecurity companies, giving investors targeted exposure to a growing technology theme.
Strong Performance From Key Holdings
Several of the largest positions, such as Caci International and Booz Allen, have shown strong gains this year, helping support the ETF’s overall results.
Global but U.S.-Centered Exposure
While most assets are in U.S. companies, the fund also includes smaller positions in Japan, the UK, Canada, Hong Kong, and Australia, adding some international diversification.
Negative Factors
Recent Weak Short-Term Performance
The ETF has experienced weak returns over the past one and three months, which may signal recent pressure on the cybersecurity sector.
High Concentration in Technology and U.S. Stocks
With most assets in U.S. technology names, the fund is heavily exposed to downturns in that sector and region.
Several Top Holdings Are Lagging
Some major positions like Fortinet, CrowdStrike, and Check Point have shown lagging performance this year, which can drag on the fund’s overall returns.
SPAM vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM2.44M
RegionDeveloped Markets
Expense Ratio0.35%
Beta1.07
IssuerThemes
Inception DateDec 08, 2023
Dividend Yield0.64%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedSolactive Cyber Security Index - Benchmark TR Net
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume384
30 Day Avg. Volume1,086
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
37.71Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering35
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
SPAM Summary
The Themes Cybersecurity ETF (SPAM) is a fund that follows the Solactive Cyber Security Index, focusing on companies that protect computers, networks, and data. It mainly holds U.S. technology firms that work in areas like network security, cloud security, and threat detection. Well-known names in the fund include Palo Alto Networks and CrowdStrike. Someone might invest in this ETF to benefit from the long-term growth of cybersecurity as more of life and business moves online, while getting diversification across many companies. A key risk is that it is heavily concentrated in tech and cybersecurity, so its price can swing sharply with that sector.
How much will it cost me?The Themes Cybersecurity ETF (Ticker: SPAM) has an expense ratio of 0.35%, which means you’ll pay $3.50 per year for every $1,000 invested. This cost is slightly higher than average because the fund is actively managed and focuses on a specific sector, requiring more research and specialized expertise. It’s a reasonable fee for investors seeking targeted exposure to the growing cybersecurity industry.
What would affect this ETF?The Themes Cybersecurity ETF could benefit from the growing demand for cybersecurity solutions as digital threats increase globally, particularly in developed markets where the fund is focused. However, potential risks include regulatory changes or economic slowdowns that may impact technology spending, as well as competition among top holdings like Palo Alto Networks and CrowdStrike, which could affect their performance. Overall, the ETF’s heavy exposure to the technology sector makes it sensitive to broader tech industry trends and innovation cycles.
SPAM Top 10 Holdings
SPAM is a pure play on developed-market cybersecurity, with most of its firepower in tech names. Clear Secure has been the surprise engine, racing higher and giving the fund a nice tailwind, while Nebius Group and Akamai are also rising and helping keep momentum positive. On the flip side, Palo Alto Networks has been losing steam this year, and Booz Allen has been more of a drag than a driver. Overall, performance is being steered by a handful of U.S.-centric security and cloud players, making the fund fairly concentrated in a single digital-defense theme.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Palo Alto Networks | 8.05% | $196.72K | $136.26B | -0.76% | 73 Outperform | |
| Akamai | 6.17% | $150.92K | $15.88B | 51.06% | 73 Outperform | |
| Nebius Group | 6.13% | $149.88K | $34.32B | 547.96% | 46 Neutral | |
| CoreWeave | 5.42% | $132.37K | $48.36B | 118.01% | 51 Neutral | |
| Nextdc Limited | 5.15% | $125.79K | AU$8.27B | 32.66% | 49 Neutral | |
| Fortinet | 4.89% | $119.59K | $59.68B | -16.26% | 71 Outperform | |
| Caci International | 4.83% | $118.00K | $12.44B | 39.61% | 78 Outperform | |
| Fastly | 4.75% | $116.20K | $4.47B | 464.66% | 63 Neutral | |
| Clear Secure | 4.61% | $112.77K | $6.53B | 89.22% | 77 Outperform | |
| Booz Allen | 4.26% | $104.12K | $9.59B | -26.91% | 65 Neutral |
SPAM Technical Analysis
Negative
―
Price Trends
29.55
Negative
30.67
Negative
32.00
Negative
Market Momentum
0.04
Negative
48.83
Neutral
86.33
Negative
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For SPAM, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 29.62, equal to the 50-day MA of 29.55, and equal to the 200-day MA of 32.00, indicating a bearish trend. The MACD of 0.04 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 48.83 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 86.33 is Negative, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for SPAM.
SPAM Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
SPAM
Themes Cybersecurity ETF
29.45
2.03
7.40%
AGNG
Global X Aging Population ETF
―
―
―
WCBR
WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund
―
―
―
WISE
Themes Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF
―
―
―
FOWF
Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF
―
―
―
TINY
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents