Education
About Us
Working with TipRanks
Follow Us
SPAM - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
Themes Cybersecurity ETF (SPAM)
Rating:65Neutral
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Strong Year-to-Date Performance
The ETF has delivered solid gains so far this year, indicating strong momentum in the cybersecurity sector.
Technology Sector Focus
With over 80% exposure to technology, the fund is positioned to benefit from growth in cybersecurity and tech innovation.
Reasonable Expense Ratio
The ETF charges a relatively low expense ratio, making it cost-effective for investors.
Negative Factors
High Geographic Concentration
The fund is heavily focused on U.S. companies, limiting diversification across global markets.
Underperforming Holdings
Some top holdings, such as Booz Allen and Akamai, have posted negative year-to-date returns, which could drag on overall performance.
Sector Overweight Risk
The heavy reliance on the technology sector increases vulnerability to downturns in tech-related industries.
SPAM vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM2.58M
RegionDeveloped Markets
Expense Ratio0.35%
Beta1.14
IssuerThemes
Inception DateDec 08, 2023
Dividend YieldN/A
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedSolactive Cyber Security Index - Benchmark TR Net
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume678
30 Day Avg. Volume1,416
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
40.59Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering36
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
SPAM Summary
The Themes Cybersecurity ETF (Ticker: SPAM) is an investment fund that focuses on companies in the cybersecurity industry, which is essential for protecting digital systems and data. It tracks the Solactive Cyber Security Index and includes well-known companies like Palo Alto Networks and CrowdStrike Holdings. This ETF is ideal for investors looking to benefit from the growth of the cybersecurity sector, which is becoming increasingly important as digital threats rise. However, new investors should be aware that the fund is heavily concentrated in technology stocks, meaning its performance can be affected by changes in the tech industry.
How much will it cost me?The Themes Cybersecurity ETF (Ticker: SPAM) has an expense ratio of 0.35%, which means you’ll pay $3.50 per year for every $1,000 invested. This cost is slightly higher than average because the fund is actively managed and focuses on a specific sector, requiring more research and specialized expertise. It’s a reasonable fee for investors seeking targeted exposure to the growing cybersecurity industry.
What would affect this ETF?The Themes Cybersecurity ETF could benefit from the growing demand for cybersecurity solutions as digital threats increase globally, particularly in developed markets where the fund is focused. However, potential risks include regulatory changes or economic slowdowns that may impact technology spending, as well as competition among top holdings like Palo Alto Networks and CrowdStrike, which could affect their performance. Overall, the ETF’s heavy exposure to the technology sector makes it sensitive to broader tech industry trends and innovation cycles.
SPAM Top 10 Holdings
The Themes Cybersecurity ETF is heavily concentrated in the technology sector, with standout performers like Zscaler and CrowdStrike driving gains thanks to strong revenue growth and bullish momentum. However, the fund is facing headwinds from lagging names like SentinelOne and Fortinet, which are grappling with bearish trends and profitability challenges. While the ETF showcases a global mix of developed markets, its focus on cybersecurity innovation keeps it anchored in a niche that’s both vital and volatile. Overall, the fund’s positioning reflects a dynamic blend of rising stars and struggling players in the digital defense space.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caci International | 5.88% | $151.81K | $13.52B | 33.19% | 78 Outperform | |
| Akamai | 5.85% | $150.93K | $12.62B | -10.07% | 74 Outperform | |
| Qualys | 5.39% | $139.02K | $5.13B | -7.99% | 77 Outperform | |
| CrowdStrike Holdings | 5.01% | $129.33K | $126.51B | 45.37% | 67 Neutral | |
| Trend Micro | 4.84% | $124.77K | ¥1.02T | -13.65% | 75 Outperform | |
| Fortinet | 4.70% | $121.37K | $60.85B | -14.16% | 71 Outperform | |
| Check Point | 4.66% | $120.28K | $20.27B | 2.67% | 76 Outperform | |
| SentinelOne | 4.52% | $116.58K | $5.36B | -41.38% | 61 Neutral | |
| CyberArk Software | 4.48% | $115.56K | $22.87B | 41.99% | 52 Neutral | |
| Palo Alto Networks | 4.38% | $112.94K | $130.85B | -3.77% | 68 Neutral |
SPAM Technical Analysis
Negative
―
Price Trends
34.32
Negative
33.43
Negative
31.96
Positive
Market Momentum
-0.63
Negative
41.87
Neutral
80.79
Negative
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For SPAM, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 32.96, equal to the 50-day MA of 34.32, and equal to the 200-day MA of 31.96, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of -0.63 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 41.87 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 80.79 is Negative, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for SPAM.
SPAM Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
SPAM
Themes Cybersecurity ETF
32.39
1.17
3.75%
AGNG
Global X Aging Population ETF
―
―
―
WISE
Themes Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF
―
―
―
FOWF
Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF
―
―
―
EFRA
iShares Environmental Infrastructure and Industrials ETF
―
―
―
TINY
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
Disclaimer
This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents