tiprankstipranks
Trending News
More News >
Advertisement

SPAM - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

SPAM

Themes Cybersecurity ETF (SPAM)

Rating:64Neutral
Price Target:
SPAM, the Themes Cybersecurity ETF, has a solid overall rating driven mainly by strong, well-established cybersecurity names like Qualys, CACI, Palo Alto Networks, and Check Point, which all show robust financial performance and positive growth outlooks. These strengths are partly offset by weaker spots such as CyberArk, where profitability and technical trends are more challenging, and by valuation and technical risks in several holdings that show signs of being expensive or under bearish pressure. The main risk factor is the fund’s concentration in a single sector—cybersecurity—which can make it more sensitive to downturns or shifts in technology spending.
Positive Factors
Leading Cybersecurity Focus
The fund is concentrated in well-known cybersecurity companies, giving investors targeted exposure to a growing technology theme.
Strong Performance From Key Holdings
Several of the largest positions, such as Caci International and Booz Allen, have shown strong gains this year, helping support the ETF’s overall results.
Global but U.S.-Centered Exposure
While most assets are in U.S. companies, the fund also includes smaller positions in Japan, the UK, Canada, Hong Kong, and Australia, adding some international diversification.
Negative Factors
Recent Weak Short-Term Performance
The ETF has experienced weak returns over the past one and three months, which may signal recent pressure on the cybersecurity sector.
High Concentration in Technology and U.S. Stocks
With most assets in U.S. technology names, the fund is heavily exposed to downturns in that sector and region.
Several Top Holdings Are Lagging
Some major positions like Fortinet, CrowdStrike, and Check Point have shown lagging performance this year, which can drag on the fund’s overall returns.

SPAM vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

SPAM Summary

The Themes Cybersecurity ETF (SPAM) is a fund that follows the Solactive Cyber Security Index, focusing on companies that protect computers, networks, and data. It mainly holds U.S. technology firms that work in areas like network security, cloud security, and threat detection. Well-known names in the fund include Palo Alto Networks and CrowdStrike. Someone might invest in this ETF to benefit from the long-term growth of cybersecurity as more of life and business moves online, while getting diversification across many companies. A key risk is that it is heavily concentrated in tech and cybersecurity, so its price can swing sharply with that sector.
How much will it cost me?The Themes Cybersecurity ETF (Ticker: SPAM) has an expense ratio of 0.35%, which means you’ll pay $3.50 per year for every $1,000 invested. This cost is slightly higher than average because the fund is actively managed and focuses on a specific sector, requiring more research and specialized expertise. It’s a reasonable fee for investors seeking targeted exposure to the growing cybersecurity industry.
What would affect this ETF?The Themes Cybersecurity ETF could benefit from the growing demand for cybersecurity solutions as digital threats increase globally, particularly in developed markets where the fund is focused. However, potential risks include regulatory changes or economic slowdowns that may impact technology spending, as well as competition among top holdings like Palo Alto Networks and CrowdStrike, which could affect their performance. Overall, the ETF’s heavy exposure to the technology sector makes it sensitive to broader tech industry trends and innovation cycles.

SPAM Top 10 Holdings

SPAM is a pure play on developed-market cybersecurity, with most of its firepower in U.S.-listed tech names. CACI and Booz Allen are doing the heavy lifting lately, rising on solid government and defense-related demand. Akamai has been a steady contributor, helped by its push into security and cloud. On the other side, high-profile names like CrowdStrike, Palo Alto Networks, and Fortinet have been losing steam, their recent weakness acting as a brake on the fund. Overall, performance is driven by a tight cluster of specialized cyber leaders.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Akamai6.79%$167.50K$13.98B-2.75%
73
Outperform
Caci International6.17%$152.04K$13.71B60.66%
78
Outperform
Qualys5.26%$129.74K$4.73B-5.39%
78
Outperform
Fortinet4.92%$121.37K$60.43B-19.45%
71
Outperform
Okta4.85%$119.71K$14.97B-10.34%
75
Outperform
Check Point4.63%$114.05K$19.27B-17.66%
76
Outperform
CrowdStrike Holdings4.54%$112.04K$111.28B10.89%
67
Neutral
Booz Allen4.52%$111.44K$10.66B-31.46%
65
Neutral
Nextdc Limited4.48%$110.44K$5.95B0.54%
49
Neutral
CyberArk Software4.35%$107.29K$21.75B16.13%
52
Neutral

SPAM Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Negative
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
31.68
Negative
100DMA
33.13
Negative
200DMA
32.25
Negative
Market Momentum
MACD
-0.16
Positive
RSI
38.12
Neutral
STOCH
29.04
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For SPAM, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 31.39, equal to the 50-day MA of 31.68, and equal to the 200-day MA of 32.25, indicating a bearish trend. The MACD of -0.16 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 38.12 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 29.04 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for SPAM.

SPAM Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$2.47M0.35%
$89.88M0.45%
$84.24M0.50%
$37.44M0.35%
$9.23M0.49%
$6.49M0.58%
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
SPAM
Themes Cybersecurity ETF
30.42
-0.14
-0.46%
WCBR
WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund
AGNG
Global X Aging Population ETF
WISE
Themes Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF
FOWF
Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF
TINY
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Disclaimer

This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement