tiprankstipranks
Advertisement

SPAM - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

SPAM

Themes Cybersecurity ETF (SPAM)

Rating:63Neutral
Price Target:
SPAM, the Themes Cybersecurity ETF, has a solid but not top-tier rating, reflecting a mix of strong leaders and some weaker names in its portfolio. High-quality holdings like Palo Alto Networks, Fortinet, Akamai, CrowdStrike, and F5 Networks support the fund with robust financial performance, growth in security and cloud services, and generally reasonable valuations. However, weaker positions such as Nebius Group, Rubrik, and Nextdc, which face profitability challenges, cash flow issues, and unattractive valuations, hold back the overall rating and highlight the main risk of owning several financially stretched or overvalued cybersecurity and infrastructure names within a concentrated sector.
Positive Factors
Strong Recent Performance
The ETF has delivered solid gains so far this year and over the past month, showing positive momentum in its strategy.
High Exposure to Growing Cybersecurity Theme
Most of the fund is invested in technology and related companies that are directly tied to the long-term growth of cybersecurity and digital infrastructure.
Several Strong-Performing Top Holdings
Key positions like Nebius Group, CoreWeave, Clear Secure, and Nextdc have shown strong year-to-date performance, helping support the fund’s returns.
Negative Factors
Concentrated in a Single Sector
With the vast majority of assets in technology and communication services, the fund is heavily exposed to swings in one part of the market.
Mixed Performance Among Top Holdings
Some large positions such as Palo Alto Networks, Caci International, SentinelOne, and CrowdStrike have been weak this year, which could drag on overall results if the trend continues.
Moderately High Expense Ratio for a Thematic ETF
The fund’s expense ratio is not low, meaning a noticeable slice of returns is used to cover fees each year.

SPAM vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

SPAM Summary

The Themes Cybersecurity ETF (SPAM) tracks the Solactive Cyber Security Index and focuses on companies that protect computers, networks, and data from online attacks. It mainly holds U.S. tech and communication firms that work in areas like network security, cloud security, and threat detection. Well-known names in the fund include Palo Alto Networks and Fortinet. An investor might choose this ETF to tap into the long-term growth of cybersecurity as more of life and business moves online. However, it is heavily focused on tech-related stocks, so its price can swing up and down more than the overall market.
How much will it cost me?The Themes Cybersecurity ETF (Ticker: SPAM) has an expense ratio of 0.35%, which means you’ll pay $3.50 per year for every $1,000 invested. This cost is slightly higher than average because the fund is actively managed and focuses on a specific sector, requiring more research and specialized expertise. It’s a reasonable fee for investors seeking targeted exposure to the growing cybersecurity industry.
What would affect this ETF?The Themes Cybersecurity ETF could benefit from the growing demand for cybersecurity solutions as digital threats increase globally, particularly in developed markets where the fund is focused. However, potential risks include regulatory changes or economic slowdowns that may impact technology spending, as well as competition among top holdings like Palo Alto Networks and CrowdStrike, which could affect their performance. Overall, the ETF’s heavy exposure to the technology sector makes it sensitive to broader tech industry trends and innovation cycles.

SPAM Top 10 Holdings

SPAM is leaning hard into pure-play cybersecurity, with a tech-heavy lineup that lives and dies by a handful of big names. Fortinet, Akamai, and CrowdStrike have been doing the heavy lifting lately, with rising share prices helping power the fund’s recent momentum. Nebius is more of a wild card, with mixed signals that can inject some volatility, while Rubrik and Zscaler are lagging and occasionally feel like they’re tapping the brakes. Most holdings are in developed markets, so you’re getting a global cyber story without venturing too far off the beaten path.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Fortinet5.47%$151.92K$98.12B29.83%
71
Outperform
Akamai5.34%$148.27K$21.41B94.13%
73
Outperform
CrowdStrike Holdings5.23%$145.33K$168.87B45.63%
67
Neutral
Nebius Group5.22%$144.97K$54.05B456.54%
46
Neutral
Rubrik, Inc. Class A5.14%$142.93K$13.70B-27.89%
50
Neutral
Palo Alto Networks4.89%$135.89K$212.63B39.53%
73
Outperform
Zscaler4.66%$129.37K$29.32B-28.23%
60
Neutral
F5, Inc.4.64%$128.99K$22.21B39.54%
74
Outperform
SentinelOne4.64%$128.89K$6.39B-5.31%
61
Neutral
Nextdc Limited4.64%$128.86KAU$11.36B29.92%
49
Neutral

SPAM Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Positive
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
31.84
Positive
100DMA
31.03
Positive
200DMA
32.14
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
1.69
Negative
RSI
81.31
Negative
STOCH
99.82
Negative
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For SPAM, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 34.45, equal to the 50-day MA of 31.84, and equal to the 200-day MA of 32.14, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 1.69 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 81.31 is Negative, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 99.82 is Negative, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for SPAM.

SPAM Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$2.98M0.35%
63
Neutral
$91.55M0.45%
64
Neutral
$82.72M0.50%
63
Neutral
$30.36M0.35%
59
Neutral
$15.78M0.75%
70
Neutral
$14.97M0.49%
69
Neutral
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
SPAM
Themes Cybersecurity ETF
38.35
6.80
21.55%
WCBR
WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund
AGNG
Global X Aging Population ETF
WISE
Themes Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF
IVEP
Dan IVES Wedbush AI Power & Infrastructure ETF
FOWF
Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement