Education
About Us
Working with TipRanks
Follow Us
FOWF - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF (FOWF)
Rating:70Neutral
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Strong Defense Leaders in Top Holdings
Many of the largest positions, including major defense contractors, have shown strong recent performance, helping support the ETF’s returns.
Recent Performance Momentum
The fund has delivered steady gains over the past month, three months, and year-to-date, indicating positive recent momentum.
Focused Yet Global Exposure
While the ETF is mainly invested in U.S. companies, it also includes meaningful exposure to the UK and several European countries, adding some international diversification.
Negative Factors
High Industry Concentration
With most of the portfolio in industrial and technology names tied to defense and warfare themes, the fund is heavily exposed to one segment of the market.
Top Holdings Dominate the Portfolio
A small group of large defense stocks makes up a significant share of assets, increasing the impact if any of these companies run into trouble.
Moderate Expense Ratio
The fund’s fee is not especially low for an ETF, which can slightly reduce long-term returns compared with cheaper alternatives.
FOWF vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM9.20M
RegionDeveloped Markets
Expense Ratio0.49%
Beta0.82
IssuerPacer
Inception DateDec 17, 2024
Dividend Yield0.74%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedSolactive Whitney Future of Warfare Index - Benchmark TR Gross
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume3,431
30 Day Avg. Volume3,426
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
38.65Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering86
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
FOWF Summary
The Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF (FOWF) follows the Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare Index, focusing on companies developing modern defense and military technology, such as cyber defense, drones, and artificial intelligence. It mainly holds U.S. industrial and tech firms, including well-known names like Boeing and Lockheed Martin. Someone might invest in this ETF to seek growth from rising defense spending and to get diversified exposure to many defense technology companies at once. A key risk is that it is heavily tied to the defense sector, so its value can swing with changes in military budgets and global tensions.
How much will it cost me?The Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF (FOWF) has an expense ratio of 0.49%, which means you’ll pay $4.90 per year for every $1,000 invested. This expense ratio is slightly higher than average because the fund is actively managed and focuses on a specialized theme within the defense and technology sectors, requiring more research and management effort.
What would affect this ETF?The Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF (FOWF) could benefit from increased government spending on defense and advancements in technologies like artificial intelligence and autonomous systems, which are central to its holdings. However, it may face challenges from geopolitical tensions, regulatory changes in defense spending, or economic slowdowns that impact industrial and technology sectors. Its focus on developed markets and reliance on major defense companies like Lockheed Martin and Boeing makes it sensitive to global security trends and innovation cycles.
FOWF Top 10 Holdings
FOWF is essentially a bet on the future of defense, with a heavy tilt toward U.S. industrial giants. Lockheed Martin and Northrop Grumman are doing much of the heavy lifting, rising on strong backlogs and demand for advanced systems, while Boeing has finally turned a corner but still feels like a recovery story rather than a clear leader. RTX and General Dynamics are steady contributors, helping smooth out the ride. International names like BAE Systems and Sweden’s Saab add a global flavor, but this fund’s engine room is firmly in developed-market defense contractors.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lockheed Martin | 9.09% | $837.17K | $146.33B | 38.48% | 70 Outperform | |
| Boeing | 8.19% | $754.68K | $183.00B | 32.30% | 54 Neutral | |
| RTX | 7.94% | $731.39K | $269.62B | 58.53% | 74 Outperform | |
| Northrop Grumman | 7.21% | $663.88K | $97.22B | 46.14% | 76 Outperform | |
| General Dynamics | 7.15% | $658.29K | $93.65B | 38.02% | 80 Outperform | |
| BAE Systems | 3.88% | $357.62K | £56.07B | 70.28% | 61 Neutral | |
| L3Harris Technologies | 3.76% | $345.94K | $63.64B | 66.85% | 70 Neutral | |
| Leidos Holdings | 2.31% | $212.38K | $24.04B | 33.69% | 77 Outperform | |
| Honeywell International | 1.79% | $164.50K | $144.47B | 3.29% | 77 Outperform | |
| Saab AB | 0.90% | $83.17K | kr361.92B | 188.01% | 70 Outperform |
FOWF Technical Analysis
Positive
―
Price Trends
31.75
Positive
31.35
Positive
29.85
Positive
Market Momentum
0.51
Positive
61.22
Neutral
26.71
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For FOWF, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 33.34, equal to the 50-day MA of 31.75, and equal to the 200-day MA of 29.85, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 0.51 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 61.22 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 26.71 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for FOWF.
FOWF Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
FOWF
Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF
33.46
8.47
33.89%
WCBR
WisdomTree Cybersecurity Fund
―
―
―
AGNG
Global X Aging Population ETF
―
―
―
WISE
Themes Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF
―
―
―
TINY
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF
―
―
―
EFRA
iShares Environmental Infrastructure and Industrials ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
Disclaimer
This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents