FOWF - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF (FOWF)
Rating:69Neutral
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Strong Overall Year-to-Date Performance
The ETF has delivered solid gains so far this year, suggesting its strategy has recently worked well for investors.
Leading Defense and Technology Companies
Several major holdings like RTX, General Dynamics, Lockheed Martin, BAE Systems, Dell, and Snowflake have shown strong or steady performance, helping support the fund’s returns.
Focused Yet Global Exposure
While most assets are in U.S. companies, the fund also includes exposure to the UK and other European markets, adding some international diversification.
Negative Factors
High Concentration in a Few Defense Stocks
A large share of the portfolio is tied up in a small number of big defense names, which increases the impact if any of these companies run into trouble.
Several Weak or Lagging Top Holdings
Key positions such as Boeing, Northrop Grumman, L3Harris, and Leidos have shown weak or negative performance, which can drag on the ETF’s results.
Sector Concentration in Industrials and Technology
With most assets in industrials and technology, the fund is heavily exposed to swings in these sectors and may be more volatile if they fall out of favor.
FOWF vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM15.69M
RegionDeveloped Markets
Expense Ratio0.49%
Beta0.81
IssuerPacer
Inception DateDec 17, 2024
Dividend Yield0.73%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedSolactive Whitney Future of Warfare Index - Benchmark TR Gross
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume770
30 Day Avg. Volume2,909
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
41.29Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering90
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
FOWF Summary
The Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF (FOWF) is a fund that follows the Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare Index, focusing on companies building the next generation of defense and military technology. It mainly holds U.S. industrial and tech firms involved in areas like cyber defense, drones, artificial intelligence, and advanced weapons. Well-known holdings include Lockheed Martin and Boeing. Someone might invest in this ETF to seek growth from rising defense spending and to get diversified exposure to many defense-tech names at once. A key risk is that it is heavily tied to the defense sector, so it can rise or fall sharply with changes in military budgets and global tensions.
How much will it cost me?The Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF (FOWF) has an expense ratio of 0.49%, which means you’ll pay $4.90 per year for every $1,000 invested. This expense ratio is slightly higher than average because the fund is actively managed and focuses on a specialized theme within the defense and technology sectors, requiring more research and management effort.
What would affect this ETF?The Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF (FOWF) could benefit from increased government spending on defense and advancements in technologies like artificial intelligence and autonomous systems, which are central to its holdings. However, it may face challenges from geopolitical tensions, regulatory changes in defense spending, or economic slowdowns that impact industrial and technology sectors. Its focus on developed markets and reliance on major defense companies like Lockheed Martin and Boeing makes it sensitive to global security trends and innovation cycles.
FOWF Top 10 Holdings
This ETF is firmly anchored in U.S. defense giants, with RTX, General Dynamics, and Lockheed Martin doing most of the heavy lifting as their shares continue to rise on strong backlogs and upbeat outlooks. Boeing, however, is stumbling, acting as a bit of a drag amid ongoing financial and operational issues. Northrop Grumman and BAE Systems are more mixed, occasionally losing steam but still supported by solid fundamentals. A smaller slice in tech names like Dell and Snowflake adds an AI-flavored kicker, while exposure is mostly to developed markets, led by the U.S. and the U.K.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RTX | 8.69% | $1.36M | $288.93B | 37.25% | 74 Outperform | |
| General Dynamics | 7.92% | $1.24M | $103.41B | 23.39% | 80 Outperform | |
| Lockheed Martin | 7.91% | $1.24M | $132.50B | 38.41% | 70 Outperform | |
| Boeing | 6.88% | $1.08M | $174.59B | -2.60% | 54 Neutral | |
| Northrop Grumman | 5.05% | $792.11K | $75.98B | -7.50% | 76 Outperform | |
| BAE Systems | 3.59% | $563.88K | £60.07B | 14.65% | 61 Neutral | |
| L3Harris Technologies | 1.98% | $310.24K | $50.65B | -0.43% | 70 Neutral | |
| Dell Technologies | 1.97% | $309.68K | $262.43B | 218.39% | 65 Neutral | |
| Leidos Holdings | 1.70% | $266.75K | $14.14B | -27.39% | 77 Outperform | |
| Snowflake | 1.36% | $212.84K | $103.32B | 43.05% | 54 Neutral |
FOWF Technical Analysis
Positive
―
Price Trends
33.91
Positive
33.48
Positive
32.70
Positive
Market Momentum
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For FOWF, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 34.17, equal to the 50-day MA of 33.91, and equal to the 200-day MA of 32.70, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of ― indicates undefined momentum. The RSI at ― is undefined, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of ― is undefined, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for FOWF.
FOWF Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
FOWF
Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF
35.21
5.86
19.97%
AGNG
Global X Aging Population ETF
―
―
―
WISE
Themes Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF
―
―
―
IVEP
Dan IVES Wedbush AI Power & Infrastructure ETF
―
―
―
TINY
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF
―
―
―
EFRA
iShares Environmental Infrastructure and Industrials ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents