Education
About Us
Working with TipRanks
Follow Us
FOWF - AI Analysis
Top Page
Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF (FOWF)
Rating:69Neutral
Price Target:
$34.00
Positive Factors
Strong Year-to-Date Performance
The ETF has delivered solid returns so far this year, indicating strong momentum.
Focused Sector Exposure
The fund’s heavy allocation to Industrials and Technology sectors aligns with growth opportunities in defense and innovation.
Reasonable Expense Ratio
The ETF charges a moderate fee, making it cost-effective compared to actively managed funds.
Negative Factors
Over-Concentration in U.S. Market
Nearly 79% of the fund is invested in U.S. companies, limiting geographic diversification.
Underperforming Top Holding
Lockheed Martin, the largest position, has shown weak year-to-date performance, potentially dragging on overall returns.
Sector Concentration Risk
Industrials make up over 63% of the portfolio, exposing the fund to risks tied to a single sector.
FOWF vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM6.31M
RegionDeveloped Markets
Expense Ratio0.49%
Beta0.81
IssuerPacer
Inception DateDec 17, 2024
Dividend Yield0.63%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedSolactive Whitney Future of Warfare Index - Benchmark TR Gross
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume2,732
30 Day Avg. Volume3,036
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
35.39Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering91
FOWF Summary
The Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF (FOWF) is an investment fund focused on companies driving innovation in defense and military technology. It tracks the Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare Index, which includes firms working on cyber defense, artificial intelligence, autonomous systems, and advanced weaponry. Some well-known companies in the ETF are Lockheed Martin and General Dynamics. Investors might consider FOWF for exposure to cutting-edge technology and the growing defense sector. However, since it is heavily tied to defense and technology industries, its performance can be impacted by changes in government spending or shifts in global security priorities.
How much will it cost me?The Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF (FOWF) has an expense ratio of 0.49%, which means you’ll pay $4.90 per year for every $1,000 invested. This expense ratio is slightly higher than average because the fund is actively managed and focuses on a specialized theme within the defense and technology sectors, requiring more research and management effort.
What would affect this ETF?The Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF (FOWF) could benefit from increased government spending on defense and advancements in technologies like artificial intelligence and autonomous systems, which are central to its holdings. However, it may face challenges from geopolitical tensions, regulatory changes in defense spending, or economic slowdowns that impact industrial and technology sectors. Its focus on developed markets and reliance on major defense companies like Lockheed Martin and Boeing makes it sensitive to global security trends and innovation cycles.
FOWF Top 10 Holdings
The Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF is heavily concentrated in the defense and technology sectors, with major players like Lockheed Martin and General Dynamics driving steady performance thanks to strong financial results and contract wins. RTX and Northrop Grumman add to the fund's momentum with robust growth and strategic positioning. However, Boeing is lagging behind due to persistent financial challenges, while BAE Systems shows mixed signals with strong fundamentals but bearish technical trends. With a focus on developed markets, this ETF offers a compelling snapshot of innovation in modern defense technologies.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lockheed Martin | 8.27% | $517.63K | $113.82B | -9.80% | 70 Outperform | |
| RTX | 8.01% | $501.74K | $239.33B | 50.32% | 75 Outperform | |
| General Dynamics | 7.85% | $491.49K | $93.16B | 17.72% | 80 Outperform | |
| Boeing | 6.40% | $400.56K | $152.79B | 30.03% | 47 Neutral | |
| Northrop Grumman | 5.59% | $350.05K | $83.27B | 15.09% | 75 Outperform | |
| L3Harris Technologies | 3.28% | $205.35K | $54.08B | 16.82% | 71 Outperform | |
| BAE Systems | 3.14% | $196.93K | £54.65B | 52.57% | 66 Neutral | |
| Leidos Holdings | 2.57% | $160.75K | $24.44B | 4.10% | 78 Outperform | |
| Honeywell International | 1.40% | $87.65K | $127.82B | -3.76% | 79 Outperform | |
| Dell Technologies | 1.39% | $87.27K | $108.93B | 23.79% | 65 Neutral |
FOWF Technical Analysis
Positive
―
Price Trends
30.82
Positive
30.02
Positive
27.79
Positive
Market Momentum
0.21
Negative
56.40
Neutral
60.97
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For FOWF, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 31.33, equal to the 50-day MA of 30.82, and equal to the 200-day MA of 27.79, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 0.21 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 56.40 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 60.97 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for FOWF.
FOWF Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
FOWF
Pacer Solactive Whitney Future of Warfare ETF
31.51
7.47
31.07%
AGNG
Global X Aging Population ETF
―
―
―
WISE
Themes Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF
―
―
―
EFRA
iShares Environmental Infrastructure and Industrials ETF
―
―
―
TINY
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF
―
―
―
KLXY
KraneShares Global Luxury Index ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
Disclaimer
This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents