tiprankstipranks
Advertisement

RUNN - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

RUNN

Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF (RUNN)

Rating:72Outperform
Price Target:
RUNN, the Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF, appears to be a solid-quality fund, supported by strong holdings like Alphabet (GOOG), which benefits from robust profitability and long-term growth potential in AI and cloud, and companies such as FTI Consulting and Eaton that show healthy financial performance and positive outlooks. However, weaker names like Air Products and Chemicals (APD), which faces profitability and cash flow challenges, along with several holdings showing bearish technical signals or valuation concerns, likely hold the rating back somewhat. The main risk factor is that many top holdings share issues around high valuations and negative or mixed technical momentum, which could increase volatility.
Positive Factors
Strong Top Holdings Performance
Several of the largest positions, such as nVent Electric and Saia, have shown strong gains this year, helping support the fund’s overall results.
Broad Sector Diversification
The ETF spreads its investments across multiple sectors like industrials, technology, health care, financials, and consumer cyclical, which can help reduce the impact of weakness in any one area.
Growing Asset Base
The fund manages a sizable pool of assets, which suggests it has attracted meaningful investor interest and may offer better trading liquidity than very small funds.
Negative Factors
Mixed Recent Performance
While the ETF is modestly positive for the year, its recent three‑month performance has been weak, showing that returns can be choppy over shorter periods.
High U.S. Concentration
With nearly all of its holdings in U.S. companies, the fund offers little geographic diversification and is heavily tied to the U.S. economy and markets.
Above‑Average Expense Ratio
The fund’s expense ratio is on the higher side for an ETF, which means more of the returns are used to cover fees instead of going to investors.

RUNN vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

RUNN Summary

The Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF (RUNN) is an actively managed fund that invests across the entire U.S. stock market, without tracking a specific index. It holds a mix of large and smaller companies, with a big focus on industrials, technology, and health care. Well-known names in the fund include Alphabet (Google’s parent company) and Intuit. Someone might consider RUNN if they want broad stock market exposure with an emphasis on growth-focused companies. However, because it is heavily invested in stocks, its value can go up and down with the overall market.
How much will it cost me?The Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF (ticker: RUNN) has an expense ratio of 0.58%, which means you’ll pay $5.80 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average because the fund is actively managed, using sophisticated strategies to optimize returns and manage risk across the total market spectrum.
What would affect this ETF?The RUNN ETF, with its focus on the U.S. market and diverse sector exposure, could benefit from economic growth, technological advancements, and increased infrastructure spending, particularly in its top-weighted Industrials and Technology sectors. However, it may face challenges from rising interest rates, which could pressure Financials, and economic slowdowns that might negatively impact Consumer Cyclical stocks. Regulatory changes in health care or industrial sectors could also influence performance.

RUNN Top 10 Holdings

RUNN’s story is driven by a heavy tilt toward U.S. industrial and tech names, with mid-cap operators doing much of the heavy lifting. Trucking specialist Saia has been sprinting ahead, while nVent Electric and FTI Consulting are also rising steadily and helping power returns. On the tech side, Alphabet is holding its own, but software giant Intuit has been losing steam lately, acting as a drag. Roper Technologies and IQVIA are more mixed to lagging, showing that not every growth-focused industrial or tech bet is firing at once.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
nVent Electric2.67%$9.63M$26.31B166.44%
76
Outperform
Alphabet Class C2.38%$8.61M$4.62T131.12%
82
Outperform
2.26%$8.17M
EMCOR Group2.16%$7.79M$40.45B108.78%
73
Outperform
Roper Technologies2.14%$7.74M$35.85B-37.80%
71
Outperform
Eaton2.06%$7.42M$163.90B41.48%
75
Outperform
Intuit2.04%$7.37M$112.55B-35.62%
73
Outperform
Air Products and Chemicals2.03%$7.33M$66.44B9.60%
46
Neutral
Primerica2.01%$7.24M$8.50B2.68%
72
Outperform
Franklin Electric Co2.00%$7.21M$4.37B12.78%
71
Outperform

RUNN Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Negative
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
33.07
Negative
100DMA
33.65
Negative
200DMA
33.70
Negative
Market Momentum
MACD
-0.03
Positive
RSI
47.87
Neutral
STOCH
35.71
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For RUNN, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 33.23, equal to the 50-day MA of 33.07, and equal to the 200-day MA of 33.70, indicating a bearish trend. The MACD of -0.03 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 47.87 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 35.71 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for RUNN.

RUNN Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$364.45M0.58%
72
Outperform
$935.39M0.59%
69
Neutral
$854.67M1.30%
64
Neutral
$780.62M0.45%
74
Outperform
$740.57M0.22%
63
Neutral
$685.05M0.50%
70
Neutral
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
RUNN
Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF
32.96
0.57
1.76%
SYLD
Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF
ULTY
YieldMax Ultra Option Income Strategy ETF
BGDV
Bahl & Gaynor Dividend ETF
AVTM
Avantis Total Equity Markets ETF
XCHG
AB US Equity ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement