tiprankstipranks
Trending News
More News >
Advertisement

RSMV - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

RSMV

Relative Strength Managed Volatility Strategy ETF 1Shs (RSMV)

Rating:69Neutral
Price Target:
RSMV’s rating suggests it is a solid, but not top-tier, ETF, supported by strong holdings like ASML and Micron, which benefit from robust financial performance, positive earnings calls, and key roles in fast-growing AI-related markets. Well-established companies such as Coca-Cola, Costco, Chevron, and Exxon Mobil also add stability through strong cash generation and strategic positioning, though issues like bearish technical trends, high valuations, and some revenue or cash flow pressures in names like Intel, Linde, and Berkshire Hathaway slightly weigh on the fund. The main risk factor is that many top holdings face valuation and momentum concerns at the same time, which could increase volatility if market sentiment turns.
Positive Factors
Strong Recent Performance
The ETF has shown steady gains over the past three months and year-to-date, indicating positive recent momentum.
Leading Technology and Industrial Holdings
Top positions in well-known technology and industrial companies have delivered strong results, helping drive the fund’s returns.
Sector Diversification Across the Economy
Holdings spread across financials, health care, technology, industrials, communication services, energy, and consumer cyclical help reduce reliance on any single sector.
Negative Factors
High Expense Ratio
The fund’s relatively high management fee means more of the gross return is eaten up by costs compared with many low-cost ETFs.
Heavy U.S. Market Concentration
With the vast majority of assets in U.S. companies, the ETF offers limited geographic diversification and is highly tied to the U.S. market’s fortunes.
Significant Financial Sector Exposure
A large allocation to financial stocks increases the fund’s sensitivity to issues affecting banks and financial markets specifically.

RSMV vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

RSMV Summary

RSMV is an actively managed ETF that looks for U.S. stocks showing strong recent performance while trying to keep price swings more controlled. It doesn’t track a fixed index, but follows a “managed volatility” growth theme across the total market, with big positions in sectors like financials, health care, and technology. Well-known holdings include Alphabet (Google), Johnson & Johnson, Exxon Mobil, and Goldman Sachs. Someone might invest for growth and diversification across many industries with some built-in risk management. A key risk is that it still holds stocks, so its price can rise or fall significantly with the overall market.
How much will it cost me?The Relative Strength Managed Volatility Strategy ETF (RSMV) has an expense ratio of 0.95%, which means you’ll pay $9.50 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average because it’s actively managed, meaning the fund managers are making strategic decisions to optimize growth and manage risk rather than simply tracking a market index.
What would affect this ETF?The RSMV ETF, with strong exposure to sectors like Technology and Health Care, could benefit from continued innovation and consumer demand in these areas, as well as a stable U.S. economy. However, it may face challenges if interest rates rise, potentially impacting growth-focused companies, or if regulatory changes affect key holdings like Apple and Adobe. Additionally, market volatility could influence performance despite the fund's managed volatility strategy.

RSMV Top 10 Holdings

RSMV’s story right now is all about U.S.-listed growth names with a clear tilt toward chip and equipment makers. Micron, Lam Research, Applied Materials, and ASML are the engines of the fund, riding strong momentum tied to AI and semiconductor demand. Industrials like Caterpillar add another rising pillar, benefiting from solid earnings and infrastructure themes. On the steadier side, health care giants such as AstraZeneca and Johnson & Johnson are more like ballast than rockets, helping smooth volatility but not driving big gains. Overall, it’s a U.S.-heavy, tech-leaning growth play.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
4.35%$1.28M
Micron3.91%$1.15M$519.68B352.37%
79
Outperform
Chevron3.80%$1.12M$396.30B23.11%
71
Outperform
Exxon Mobil3.77%$1.11M$656.64B36.55%
74
Outperform
Berkshire Hathaway B3.62%$1.07M$1.05T-7.77%
66
Neutral
Intel3.58%$1.06M$224.92B86.69%
64
Neutral
Linde3.57%$1.05M$226.40B6.27%
66
Neutral
Coca-Cola3.57%$1.05M$326.73B9.66%
75
Outperform
Costco3.56%$1.05M$434.74B10.92%
72
Outperform
ASML Holding3.55%$1.05M$522.04B90.01%
81
Outperform

RSMV Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Negative
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
27.45
Negative
100DMA
27.26
Negative
200DMA
26.25
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
-0.19
Positive
RSI
40.45
Neutral
STOCH
54.28
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For RSMV, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 27.27, equal to the 50-day MA of 27.45, and equal to the 200-day MA of 26.25, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of -0.19 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 40.45 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 54.28 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for RSMV.

RSMV Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
0.95%
69
Neutral
$20.02B0.39%
69
Neutral
$997.43M0.57%
73
Outperform
$697.85M0.59%
74
Outperform
$523.27M0.49%
71
Outperform
$442.89M0.61%
71
Outperform
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
RSMV
Relative Strength Managed Volatility Strategy ETF 1Shs
26.70
3.07
12.99%
CGGR
Capital Group Growth ETF
WINN
Harbor Long-Term Growers ETF
LSGR
Natixis Loomis Sayles Focused Growth ETF
GQGU
GQG US Equity ETF
BASG
Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement