Education
About Us
Working with TipRanks
Follow Us
RPG - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF (RPG)
Rating:73Outperform
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Strong Top Holdings
Several key holdings, like Palantir Technologies and Nvidia, have delivered strong year-to-date performance, supporting the ETF's overall returns.
Sector Diversification
The ETF is spread across multiple sectors, including Technology, Industrials, and Consumer Cyclical, reducing reliance on any single industry.
Reasonable Expense Ratio
The ETF's expense ratio of 0.35% is competitive, making it a cost-effective choice for investors.
Negative Factors
High Geographic Concentration
The ETF is entirely focused on U.S. companies, limiting exposure to international markets and diversification.
Underperforming Holdings
Some holdings, like Norwegian Cruise Line, have shown negative year-to-date performance, which could drag on overall returns.
Sector Overweight Risk
The ETF has significant exposure to Technology and Industrials, which could make it vulnerable if these sectors face downturns.
RPG vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM1.63B
RegionNorth America
Expense Ratio0.35%
Beta1.34
IssuerInvesco
Inception DateMar 01, 2006
Dividend Yield0.24%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedS&P 500 Pure Growth
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume98,571
30 Day Avg. Volume177,116
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
54.41Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusStrong Buy
Number of Analyst Covering60
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
RPG Summary
The Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF (RPG) is an investment fund that focuses on large U.S. companies with strong growth potential. It follows the S&P 500 Pure Growth Index, which includes companies expected to grow their revenue and earnings faster than others. Some well-known companies in this ETF are Nvidia and Palantir Technologies. Investors might consider RPG for its focus on growth and diversification across sectors like technology, industrials, and consumer cyclical. However, new investors should be aware that this ETF is heavily focused on growth stocks, which can be more volatile and sensitive to market changes.
How much will it cost me?The Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF (RPG) has an expense ratio of 0.35%, meaning you’ll pay $3.50 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is slightly higher than the average for ETFs because RPG is designed to track a specific growth-focused index, which requires more active management compared to broad market ETFs. It’s a reasonable cost for investors seeking targeted exposure to large-cap growth stocks.
What would affect this ETF?The Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF (RPG) could benefit from continued innovation and strong performance in the technology and consumer cyclical sectors, which make up a significant portion of its holdings. However, economic uncertainty, rising interest rates, or regulatory changes could negatively impact growth stocks, particularly in sectors like technology and financials. Additionally, as the ETF focuses heavily on U.S.-based companies, it may be vulnerable to domestic economic challenges or geopolitical risks.
RPG Top 10 Holdings
The Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF (RPG) leans heavily into growth-oriented sectors like technology, consumer cyclical, and industrials, with a strong U.S. focus. Nvidia, a key holding, has shown mixed performance recently, with its AI-driven growth story tempered by valuation concerns. Palantir is rising steadily, fueled by its AI momentum, while Carnival and United Airlines are cruising higher on post-pandemic recovery tailwinds. However, Vistra Energy is lagging, weighed down by declining profitability and operational challenges. Overall, the fund’s positioning reflects a bold bet on innovation and economic recovery, though some holdings face headwinds.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Berkshire Hathaway B | 2.86% | $46.00M | $1.08T | 12.90% | 66 Neutral | |
| Comfort Systems | 2.45% | $39.40M | $34.27B | 120.77% | 80 Outperform | |
| Palantir Technologies | 2.41% | $38.67M | $423.04B | 162.95% | 74 Outperform | |
| Amphenol | 2.35% | $37.76M | $166.78B | 94.09% | 78 Outperform | |
| Howmet Aerospace | 2.29% | $36.77M | $84.44B | 86.45% | 67 Neutral | |
| SanDisk Corp | 2.28% | $36.64M | $49.03B | ― | 55 Neutral | |
| AppLovin | 2.26% | $36.25M | $208.36B | 93.58% | 74 Outperform | |
| Eli Lilly & Co | 2.21% | $35.55M | $1.03T | 35.66% | 72 Outperform | |
| Robinhood | 2.21% | $35.52M | $103.76B | 187.90% | 68 Neutral | |
| Monolithic Power | 2.14% | $34.31M | $45.95B | 62.22% | 75 Outperform |
RPG Technical Analysis
Positive
―
Price Trends
46.63
Positive
47.02
Positive
44.85
Positive
Market Momentum
0.41
Negative
55.02
Neutral
78.44
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For RPG, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 47.36, equal to the 50-day MA of 46.63, and equal to the 200-day MA of 44.85, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 0.41 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 55.02 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 78.44 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for RPG.
RPG Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
RPG
Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF
47.80
6.36
15.35%
JGRO
JPMorgan Active Growth ETF
―
―
―
FELG
Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF
―
―
―
COWG
Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF
―
―
―
QGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund
―
―
―
NULG
Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Growth ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
Disclaimer
This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents