RCTR - ETF AI Analysis

Top Page

First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF (RCTR)

Rating:57Neutral

Price Target:―

The First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF (RCTR) has a balanced overall rating, reflecting both strengths and challenges among its holdings. Hitachi and Cameco stand out as key contributors to the fund's rating, with Hitachi benefiting from strong financial performance and growth prospects, and Cameco leveraging its strategic partnerships and robust position in the nuclear sector. However, holdings like Mitsubishi Heavy Industries and Entergy face challenges such as high valuations, bearish technical indicators, and financial risks, which may have weighed on the ETF's overall score. A notable risk for this ETF is its exposure to companies with valuation concerns and technical weaknesses, which could impact short-term performance.

Positive Factors

Strong Year-to-Date Performance

The ETF has delivered solid gains so far this year, reflecting positive momentum in its holdings.

Global Diversification

The fund invests in companies across multiple countries, reducing reliance on any single geographic market.

Sector Focus on Utilities and Industrials

Heavy exposure to stable sectors like utilities and industrials provides resilience during economic uncertainty.

Negative Factors

High Expense Ratio

The ETF charges a relatively high fee compared to many other funds, which can eat into long-term returns.

Underperforming Holdings

Several top holdings have shown weak year-to-date performance, which could drag on the fund’s overall results.

Limited Technology Exposure

The ETF has minimal exposure to the technology sector, potentially missing out on growth opportunities in that space.

RCTR vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

AUM17.31M

RegionGlobal

Expense Ratio0.70%

Beta1.45

IssuerFirst Trust

Inception DateJul 30, 2025

Dividend YieldN/A

Asset ClassEquity

Index TrackedBloomberg Nuclear Power Index - Benchmark TR Net

Share Statistics

EPS (TTM)N/A

Shares OutstandingN/A

10 Day Avg. Volume7,947

30 Day Avg. Volume7,860

Financial Highlights & Ratios

PEG RatioN/A

Price to Book (P/B)N/A

Price to Sales (P/S)N/A

P/FCF RatioN/A

Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A

Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A

Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A

Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A

Forecast

1Y Price Target

37.28

Price Target Upside― Downside

Rating ConsensusModerate Buy

Number of Analyst Covering41

EPS Forecast (FY)N/A

Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A

RCTR Summary

The First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF (RCTR) is a fund that focuses on companies involved in nuclear energy, a clean and sustainable power source. It tracks the Bloomberg Nuclear Power Index, which includes businesses like Mitsubishi Heavy Industries and Duke Energy that are key players in the nuclear energy sector. This ETF could be a good choice for investors looking to support the transition to renewable energy while diversifying their portfolio. However, new investors should know that the fund’s performance depends heavily on the nuclear energy industry, which can be affected by changes in energy policies or public sentiment.

How much will it cost me?The First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF (RCTR) has an expense ratio of 0.7%, which means you’ll pay $7 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average because the fund is actively managed and focuses on a specific sector, requiring more research and specialized management.

What would affect this ETF?The First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF (RCTR) could benefit from growing global interest in clean energy solutions, as nuclear power is increasingly seen as a reliable and sustainable alternative to fossil fuels. However, the ETF may face challenges from regulatory hurdles, public concerns over nuclear safety, or competition from other renewable energy sources like wind and solar. Its exposure to utilities and industrial sectors, along with top holdings like Oklo Inc and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, positions it to capitalize on innovation in nuclear technology, but economic downturns or geopolitical tensions could negatively impact its performance.

RCTR Top 10 Holdings

The First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF (RCTR) is powered by a global mix of companies driving innovation in nuclear energy, with a notable concentration in utilities and industrials. Rolls-Royce Holdings is rising steadily, buoyed by strategic initiatives and improved margins, while Cameco’s strong positioning in the nuclear sector adds momentum. On the flip side, Duke Energy is lagging, weighed down by bearish technical signals and cash flow challenges. With a focus on clean energy and a diverse geographic footprint, this fund offers a compelling play on the future of sustainable power.

Name	Company Name	Weight %	Market Value	Market Cap	Yearly Gain	Overall Rating
CCJ	Cameco	5.46%	$947.42K	$45.85B	114.78%	71 Outperform
BHP	BHP Group Ltd	4.96%	$860.88K	£121.05B	14.38%	68 Neutral
6501	Hitachi,Ltd.	4.84%	$839.57K	¥23.46T	37.19%	77 Outperform
RR	Rolls-Royce Holdings	4.73%	$819.49K	£108.65B	142.15%	71 Outperform
7011	Mitsubishi Heavy Industries	4.71%	$817.32K	¥14.35T	102.40%	60 Neutral
GEV	GE Vernova Inc.	4.60%	$797.44K	$168.90B	71.18%	69 Neutral
BWXT	BWX Technologies	4.50%	$780.72K	$17.66B	68.45%	75 Outperform
ETR	Entergy	4.16%	$721.31K	$40.73B	19.69%	66 Neutral
DUK	Duke Energy	4.13%	$716.71K	$90.83B	10.82%	70 Outperform
SO	Southern Co	4.01%	$696.10K	$96.04B	7.26%	68 Neutral

RCTR Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment

Positive

Last Price―

Price Trends

50DMA

33.49

Positive

100DMA

32.99

Positive

200DMA

Market Momentum

MACD

0.34

Negative

RSI

59.57

Neutral

STOCH

84.28

Negative

Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For RCTR, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 33.29, equal to the 50-day MA of 33.49, and equal to the 200-day MA of ―, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of 0.34 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 59.57 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 84.28 is Negative, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for RCTR.

RCTR Peer Comparison

Comparison Results

Name	Price	Price Target	AUM	Expense Ratio	Overall Rating
RCTR	―	―	$17.31M	0.70%	―
FFND	―	―	$95.23M	1.00%	―
EVX	―	―	$92.24M	0.55%	―
IBLC	―	―	$88.36M	0.47%	―
AGIX	―	―	$87.83M	0.99%	―
URAN	―	―	$23.05M	0.35%	―

Performance Comparison

RCTR

First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF

34.54

4.79

16.10%

FFND

Future Fund Active ETF

―

EVX

VanEck Environmental Services ETF

―

IBLC

iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF

―

AGIX

KraneShares Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF

―

URAN

Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF

―

Glossary

BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Disclaimer

This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―

Table of Contents