Education
About Us
Working with TipRanks
Follow Us
RCTR - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF (RCTR)
Rating:57Neutral
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Strong Recent Performance
The ETF has shown solid gains so far this year and in recent months, indicating positive momentum in its nuclear power theme.
Leading Holdings Performing Well
Several of the largest positions, including major industrial and energy names, have delivered strong year-to-date results that support the fund’s overall performance.
Global Diversification Within Nuclear Theme
Holdings spread across the U.S., Japan, the UK, Canada, and other markets help reduce the impact of weakness in any single country.
Negative Factors
High Expense Ratio
The fund’s relatively high management fee means more of the returns are eaten up by costs compared with many broad-market ETFs.
Sector Concentration Risk
Heavy exposure to industrials, utilities, and energy ties the ETF’s fortunes closely to a few related sectors, increasing vulnerability if these areas struggle.
Thematic and Industry-Specific Risk
Because the ETF is focused on nuclear power, it is more sensitive to regulatory changes, public sentiment, and industry-specific setbacks than a broadly diversified fund.
RCTR vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM23.00M
RegionGlobal
Expense Ratio0.70%
Beta1.18
IssuerFirst Trust
Inception DateJul 30, 2025
Dividend YieldN/A
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedBloomberg Nuclear Power Index - Benchmark TR Net
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume2,695
30 Day Avg. Volume6,648
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
40.46Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering41
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
RCTR Summary
The First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF (RCTR) is a fund that follows the Bloomberg Nuclear Power Index, focusing on companies involved in nuclear energy around the world. It holds firms that build reactors, supply uranium, and run nuclear power plants. Well-known names in the fund include Duke Energy and Rolls-Royce Holdings. Someone might invest in this ETF to bet on the long-term growth of nuclear power as a cleaner energy source and to get diversified exposure to many nuclear-related companies at once. A key risk is that it is concentrated in one sector, so its price can swing more than the overall market.
How much will it cost me?The First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF (RCTR) has an expense ratio of 0.7%, which means you’ll pay $7 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average because the fund is actively managed and focuses on a specific sector, requiring more research and specialized management.
What would affect this ETF?The First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF (RCTR) could benefit from growing global interest in clean energy solutions, as nuclear power is increasingly seen as a reliable and sustainable alternative to fossil fuels. However, the ETF may face challenges from regulatory hurdles, public concerns over nuclear safety, or competition from other renewable energy sources like wind and solar. Its exposure to utilities and industrial sectors, along with top holdings like Oklo Inc and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, positions it to capitalize on innovation in nuclear technology, but economic downturns or geopolitical tensions could negatively impact its performance.
RCTR Top 10 Holdings
RCTR is very much a pure-play bet on nuclear power, with a global mix of industrials and utilities doing the heavy lifting. On the industrial side, Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, GE Vernova, and Rolls-Royce have been rising, acting as the fund’s main engines as demand for nuclear technology and equipment heats up. Cameco, a key uranium producer, has been more mixed lately, occasionally losing steam after a strong run. On the utility side, steady but slower-moving names like Entergy, Southern, and Duke Energy provide ballast but can also gently cap the fund’s upside.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BHP Group Ltd | 5.40% | $1.20M | AU$293.01B | 64.51% | 68 Neutral | |
| Mitsubishi Heavy Industries | 5.19% | $1.15M | ¥16.55T | 106.88% | 60 Neutral | |
| GE Vernova Inc. | 5.03% | $1.11M | $226.94B | 168.95% | 69 Neutral | |
| Cameco | 4.86% | $1.08M | C$70.11B | 181.19% | 71 Outperform | |
| BWX Technologies | 4.60% | $1.02M | $18.82B | 103.29% | 75 Outperform | |
| Entergy | 4.59% | $1.02M | $47.93B | 24.36% | 66 Neutral | |
| Duke Energy | 4.55% | $1.01M | $102.21B | 12.90% | 70 Outperform | |
| Southern Co | 4.52% | $999.94K | $108.35B | 7.68% | 68 Neutral | |
| Rolls-Royce Holdings | 4.38% | $970.42K | £109.78B | 67.98% | 71 Outperform | |
| Vistra Corp | 3.98% | $881.26K | $54.49B | 27.38% | 65 Neutral |
RCTR Technical Analysis
Negative
―
Price Trends
35.77
Positive
34.86
Positive
Market Momentum
0.59
Positive
48.41
Neutral
70.25
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For RCTR, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 37.01, equal to the 50-day MA of 35.77, and equal to the 200-day MA of ―, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of 0.59 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 48.41 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 70.25 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for RCTR.
RCTR Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
RCTR
First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF
36.69
6.94
23.33%
FFND
Future Fund Active ETF
―
―
―
AIFD
TCW Artificial Intelligence ETF
―
―
―
HERO
Global X Video Games & Esports ETF
―
―
―
YNOT
Horizon Digital Frontier ETF
―
―
―
URAN
Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
Disclaimer
This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents