Education
About Us
Working with TipRanks
Follow Us
RCTR - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF (RCTR)
Rating:57Neutral
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Strong Year-to-Date Performance
The ETF has delivered solid gains so far this year, reflecting positive momentum in its holdings.
Global Diversification
The fund invests in companies across multiple countries, reducing reliance on any single geographic market.
Sector Focus on Utilities and Industrials
Heavy exposure to stable sectors like utilities and industrials provides resilience during economic uncertainty.
Negative Factors
High Expense Ratio
The ETF charges a relatively high fee compared to many other funds, which can eat into long-term returns.
Underperforming Holdings
Several top holdings have shown weak year-to-date performance, which could drag on the fund’s overall results.
Limited Technology Exposure
The ETF has minimal exposure to the technology sector, potentially missing out on growth opportunities in that space.
RCTR vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM15.18M
RegionGlobal
Expense Ratio0.70%
Beta1.52
IssuerFirst Trust
Inception DateJul 30, 2025
Dividend YieldN/A
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedBloomberg Nuclear Power Index - Benchmark TR Net
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume4,986
30 Day Avg. Volume8,709
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
37.09Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering41
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
RCTR Summary
The First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF (RCTR) is a fund that focuses on companies involved in nuclear energy, a clean and sustainable power source. It tracks the Bloomberg Nuclear Power Index, which includes businesses like Mitsubishi Heavy Industries and Duke Energy that are key players in the nuclear energy sector. This ETF could be a good choice for investors looking to support the transition to renewable energy while diversifying their portfolio. However, new investors should know that the fund’s performance depends heavily on the nuclear energy industry, which can be affected by changes in energy policies or public sentiment.
How much will it cost me?The First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF (RCTR) has an expense ratio of 0.7%, which means you’ll pay $7 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average because the fund is actively managed and focuses on a specific sector, requiring more research and specialized management.
What would affect this ETF?The First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF (RCTR) could benefit from growing global interest in clean energy solutions, as nuclear power is increasingly seen as a reliable and sustainable alternative to fossil fuels. However, the ETF may face challenges from regulatory hurdles, public concerns over nuclear safety, or competition from other renewable energy sources like wind and solar. Its exposure to utilities and industrial sectors, along with top holdings like Oklo Inc and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, positions it to capitalize on innovation in nuclear technology, but economic downturns or geopolitical tensions could negatively impact its performance.
RCTR Top 10 Holdings
The First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF (RCTR) is powered by a global mix of companies driving the nuclear energy revolution, with a clear focus on utilities and industrials. Rising stars like Cameco and Constellation Energy are boosting the fund’s performance, thanks to strong financials and strategic positioning in nuclear energy. However, lagging momentum from names like Southern Co and BWX Technologies has been a drag, with bearish technical signals tempering their outlook. Overall, the ETF’s sector concentration in utilities and industrials reflects its commitment to clean energy innovation, positioning it well for long-term growth.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GE Vernova Inc. | 5.19% | $767.09K | $182.25B | 102.32% | 69 Neutral | |
| Cameco | 4.99% | $737.84K | C$54.85B | 68.52% | 71 Outperform | |
| BHP Group Ltd | 4.93% | $729.95K | £115.24B | 18.35% | 68 Neutral | |
| Hitachi,Ltd. | 4.91% | $725.85K | ¥22.89T | 29.70% | 77 Outperform | |
| Mitsubishi Heavy Industries | 4.83% | $714.94K | ¥13.98T | 76.67% | 60 Neutral | |
| Constellation Energy Corporation | 4.49% | $664.54K | $109.92B | 47.23% | 72 Outperform | |
| Entergy | 4.44% | $657.44K | $41.24B | 24.39% | 66 Neutral | |
| BWX Technologies | 4.30% | $636.58K | $16.00B | 44.76% | 75 Outperform | |
| Duke Energy | 4.29% | $633.92K | $89.66B | 5.95% | 70 Outperform | |
| Rolls-Royce Holdings | 4.27% | $631.66K | £92.13B | 102.63% | 71 Outperform |
RCTR Technical Analysis
Negative
―
Price Trends
34.04
Negative
Market Momentum
-0.12
Negative
45.97
Neutral
53.15
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For RCTR, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 32.77, equal to the 50-day MA of 34.04, and equal to the 200-day MA of ―, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of -0.12 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 45.97 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 53.15 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for RCTR.
RCTR Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
RCTR
First Trust Bloomberg Nuclear Power ETF
32.78
3.03
10.18%
FFND
Future Fund Active ETF
―
―
―
IBLC
iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF
―
―
―
EVX
VanEck Environmental Services ETF
―
―
―
XAIX
Xtrackers Artificial Intelligence and Big Data ETF
―
―
―
URAN
Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
Disclaimer
This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents