Education
About Us
Working with TipRanks
Follow Us
QDEF - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund (QDEF)
Rating:74Outperform
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Strong Top Holdings
Several key holdings, including Nvidia, Broadcom, and Microsoft, have shown strong year-to-date performance, supporting the ETF's overall returns.
Sector Diversification
The ETF is spread across multiple sectors, with significant exposure to Technology, Health Care, and Financials, reducing reliance on any single industry.
Reasonable Expense Ratio
With a relatively low expense ratio of 0.37%, the fund offers cost efficiency compared to many actively managed alternatives.
Negative Factors
High Technology Concentration
Over 33% of the portfolio is allocated to Technology, making the fund vulnerable to downturns in this sector.
Limited Geographic Exposure
The ETF is entirely focused on U.S. companies, which limits diversification across global markets.
Underperforming Holding
Procter & Gamble, one of the top holdings, has shown negative year-to-date performance, slightly dragging on overall returns.
QDEF vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM500.03M
RegionNorth America
Expense Ratio0.37%
Beta0.76
IssuerFlexShares
Inception DateDec 14, 2012
Dividend Yield1.71%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedNorthern Trust Quality Dividend Defensive (TR)
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume9,894
30 Day Avg. Volume11,867
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
94.41Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering128
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
QDEF Summary
The FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund (QDEF) is an ETF that focuses on high-quality companies paying consistent dividends, making it a good option for investors seeking steady income and stability. It tracks the Northern Trust Quality Dividend Defensive Index and includes well-known companies like Apple and Nvidia. This fund emphasizes defensive stocks, meaning it prioritizes financially strong companies that can perform well even in uncertain markets. Someone might invest in QDEF to balance growth and income while reducing risk. However, since it heavily invests in technology stocks, its performance could be affected if the tech sector faces challenges.
How much will it cost me?The expense ratio for QDEF is 0.37%, which means you’ll pay $3.70 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is slightly higher than average because the fund is passively managed but focuses on a specific niche of high-quality, dividend-paying stocks with defensive characteristics.
What would affect this ETF?QDEF's focus on high-quality dividend-paying stocks in defensive sectors like Health Care and Consumer Defensive could benefit from economic uncertainty, as investors often seek stability and income during volatile times. However, its significant exposure to Technology, including top holdings like Apple and Nvidia, makes it sensitive to interest rate hikes and regulatory changes, which could negatively impact growth-oriented companies. Additionally, its U.S.-centric portfolio may face risks from domestic economic slowdowns or benefit from favorable U.S. market conditions.
QDEF Top 10 Holdings
The FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund (QDEF) leans heavily into technology, with Apple and Nvidia leading the charge. Apple’s steady gains and Nvidia’s AI-driven growth have been key drivers, though Nvidia’s recent mixed performance hints at some turbulence. Microsoft and Broadcom add further tech muscle, but their momentum has been uneven. Outside of tech, Johnson & Johnson’s strong healthcare presence provides stability, while Procter & Gamble’s lagging performance in consumer defensive weighs on the fund. With a clear U.S. focus and a tilt toward tech and healthcare, QDEF balances growth potential with defensive characteristics.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apple | 7.63% | $37.85M | $3.83T | 11.03% | 79 Outperform | |
| Nvidia | 6.45% | $31.98M | $4.49T | 38.81% | 76 Outperform | |
| Broadcom | 4.82% | $23.91M | $1.64T | 56.34% | 76 Outperform | |
| Microsoft | 4.71% | $23.39M | $3.56T | 14.38% | 79 Outperform | |
| Johnson & Johnson | 3.04% | $15.06M | $492.44B | 45.16% | 78 Outperform | |
| AbbVie | 2.90% | $14.39M | $388.97B | 24.50% | 66 Neutral | |
| Procter & Gamble | 2.51% | $12.46M | $331.51B | -9.68% | 69 Neutral | |
| Alphabet Class A | 2.36% | $11.70M | $3.97T | 73.74% | 85 Outperform | |
| JPMorgan Chase | 2.15% | $10.68M | $896.14B | 32.87% | 72 Outperform | |
| Philip Morris | 1.94% | $9.64M | $253.13B | 40.50% | 61 Neutral |
QDEF Technical Analysis
Positive
―
Price Trends
80.50
Positive
79.56
Positive
75.34
Positive
Market Momentum
0.37
Negative
62.69
Neutral
85.79
Negative
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For QDEF, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 81.32, equal to the 50-day MA of 80.50, and equal to the 200-day MA of 75.34, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 0.37 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 62.69 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 85.79 is Negative, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for QDEF.
QDEF Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
QDEF
FlexShares Quality Dividend Defensive Index Fund
82.15
13.68
19.98%
SYLD
Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF
―
―
―
PLDR
Putnam Sustainable Leaders ETF
―
―
―
ABFL
Fcf Us Quality Etf
―
―
―
AUSF
Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF
―
―
―
PFM
Invesco Dividend Achievers ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
Disclaimer
This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents