POWA - ETF AI Analysis

Top Page

Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power Etf (POWA)

Rating:71Outperform

Price Target:―

POWA, the Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF, has a solid overall rating driven by strong, high-quality companies like Walmart and Accenture, which benefit from robust financial performance, growth in areas like e-commerce and AI, and generally positive market trends. Other holdings such as KLA and US Foods also add support through healthy cash flows and strategic growth initiatives, though some names like International Paper and ADM, which face profitability and growth challenges, weigh on the fund’s rating. A key risk is that several holdings show signs of rich valuations or overbought technical conditions, which could increase volatility if market sentiment shifts.

Positive Factors

Broad Sector Mix

Holdings spread across technology, health care, industrials, and consumer sectors help reduce reliance on any single part of the economy.

Strong Top Holdings Performance

Many of the largest positions, such as KLA, Cummins, and Archer Daniels Midland, have shown strong gains this year, supporting the fund’s overall results.

Positive Recent Returns

The ETF has delivered steady gains over the year-to-date, three-month, and one-month periods, indicating resilient recent performance.

Negative Factors

High U.S. Concentration

With nearly all assets in U.S. companies, the fund offers limited geographic diversification and is heavily tied to the U.S. market.

Moderate Expense Ratio

The fund’s expense ratio is not especially low, meaning fees take a noticeable, ongoing bite out of investor returns compared with cheaper index ETFs.

Limited Financials and Communication Exposure

Very small allocations to financial and communication services stocks may leave investors underexposed to potential strength in those areas of the market.

POWA vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

AUM195.36M

RegionNorth America

Expense Ratio0.40%

Beta0.69

IssuerInvesco

Inception DateDec 15, 2006

Dividend Yield0.91%

Asset ClassEquity

Index TrackedBloomberg Pricing Power Index

Share Statistics

EPS (TTM)N/A

Shares OutstandingN/A

10 Day Avg. Volume2,732

30 Day Avg. Volume3,711

Financial Highlights & Ratios

PEG RatioN/A

Price to Book (P/B)N/A

Price to Sales (P/S)N/A

P/FCF RatioN/A

Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A

Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A

Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A

Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A

Forecast

1Y Price Target

106.92

Price Target Upside― Downside

Rating ConsensusModerate Buy

Number of Analyst Covering51

EPS Forecast (FY)N/A

Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A

POWA Summary

The Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF (POWA) follows the Bloomberg Pricing Power Index, focusing on U.S. companies that can raise prices without losing many customers. It holds a mix of sectors like technology, health care, and consumer goods, with well-known names such as Walmart and Lowe’s. Investors might consider POWA if they want broad diversification in companies that may handle inflation and rising costs better by protecting their profit margins. A key risk is that the fund can still go up and down with the overall stock market, and it is especially sensitive to changes in the U.S. economy.

How much will it cost me?The Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF (POWA) has an expense ratio of 0.40%, which means you’ll pay $4 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is slightly higher than average for ETFs because it is actively managed, focusing on companies with strong pricing power. Active management typically involves more research and decision-making, which can increase costs.

What would affect this ETF?The Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power ETF (POWA) could benefit from inflationary periods or economic uncertainty, as its focus on companies with strong pricing power allows them to maintain profitability even when costs rise. However, a slowdown in consumer spending or stricter regulations in key sectors like Health Care and Technology could negatively impact its performance, given its significant exposure to these industries.

POWA Top 10 Holdings

POWA leans heavily on U.S. names with real pricing clout, and its recent strength is coming from a mix of tech and old-school industrial muscle. Chip-related players like Synopsys and KLA are rising and help set the tone, giving the fund a clear tilt toward high-end technology. On the more traditional side, Cummins and ADM have been climbing, adding steady industrial and agricultural ballast. Retail giants Lowe’s and Walmart are also pulling their weight, while International Paper is lagging a bit, acting as a small speed bump rather than a roadblock.

Name	Company Name	Weight %	Market Value	Market Cap	Yearly Gain	Overall Rating
USFD	US Foods Holding	2.59%	$5.07M	$21.30B	34.52%	74 Outperform
JBL	Jabil	2.50%	$4.89M	$27.51B	57.98%	73 Outperform
IP	International Paper Co	2.45%	$4.80M	$25.60B	-16.41%	49 Neutral
CMI	Cummins	2.40%	$4.70M	$81.93B	55.29%	72 Outperform
KLAC	KLA	2.40%	$4.70M	$194.03B	89.02%	77 Outperform
IRM	Iron Mountain	2.37%	$4.65M	$31.31B	15.67%	55 Neutral
PWR	Quanta Services	2.37%	$4.64M	$77.44B	97.04%	78 Outperform
WMT	Walmart	2.36%	$4.63M	$1.01T	28.45%	78 Outperform
LOW	Lowe's	2.32%	$4.54M	$158.26B	12.89%	69 Neutral
AME	Ametek	2.31%	$4.53M	$53.65B	23.29%	79 Outperform

POWA Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment

Positive

Last Price―

Price Trends

50DMA

91.83

Positive

100DMA

90.68

Positive

200DMA

88.58

Positive

Market Momentum

MACD

0.27

Positive

RSI

52.21

Neutral

STOCH

54.19

Neutral

Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For POWA, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 92.84, equal to the 50-day MA of 91.83, and equal to the 200-day MA of 88.58, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 0.27 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 52.21 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 54.19 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for POWA.

POWA Peer Comparison

Comparison Results

Name	Price	Price Target	AUM	Expense Ratio	Overall Rating
POWA	―	―	$195.36M	0.40%	―
SYLD	―	―	$939.02M	0.59%	―
AUSF	―	―	$819.18M	0.27%	―
PLDR	―	―	$811.98M	0.59%	―
ABFL	―	―	$795.26M	0.49%	―
BGDV	―	―	$775.36M	0.45%	―

Performance Comparison

POWA

Invesco Bloomberg Pricing Power Etf

92.88

10.29

12.46%

SYLD

Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF

―

AUSF

Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF

―

PLDR

Putnam Sustainable Leaders ETF

―

ABFL

Fcf Us Quality Etf

―

BGDV

Bahl & Gaynor Dividend ETF

―

Glossary

BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Disclaimer

This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―

Table of Contents