tiprankstipranks
Advertisement

NUKZ - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

NUKZ

Range Nuclear Renaissance Index ETF (NUKZ)

Rating:53Neutral
Price Target:
NUKZ, the Range Nuclear Renaissance Index ETF, has a moderate overall rating that reflects a mix of strong core holdings and some notable risks. High-quality names like Cameco, Duke Energy, and PG&E support the fund with solid financial performance, positive earnings call sentiment, and strategic positions in the nuclear and broader energy space, though some face bearish technical trends or cash flow challenges. The main risk factor is the fund’s concentration in utilities and energy-related companies, where issues like high leverage, valuation concerns, and regulatory or liquidity risks for holdings such as Vistra Energy and Dominion Energy can weigh on the ETF’s overall appeal.
Positive Factors
Strong Recent Year-to-Date Performance
The ETF has delivered solid gains so far this year, suggesting its strategy has been working in the current market.
Leading Holdings Showing Strong Momentum
Several of the largest positions, including Cameco, GE Vernova, and Endesa, have shown strong performance, helping drive the fund’s overall returns.
Focused Exposure to Nuclear-Related Industries
Heavy weights in industrials, utilities, and energy give investors targeted exposure to companies positioned to benefit from a nuclear power build-out.
Negative Factors
Relatively High Expense Ratio
The fund’s fee is on the higher side for an ETF, which can eat into long-term returns compared with lower-cost alternatives.
Sector Concentration Risk
Large allocations to just a few sectors, especially industrials and utilities, mean the fund could be hit hard if these areas fall out of favor.
Mixed Performance Among Top Holdings
Some key positions, such as Talen Energy and Vistra, have shown weak or negative performance, which can offset gains from stronger holdings.

NUKZ vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

NUKZ Summary

The Range Nuclear Renaissance Index ETF (NUKZ) tracks the VettaFi Nuclear Renaissance Index, focusing on companies tied to nuclear energy. It holds businesses involved in uranium mining, nuclear power plants, and new nuclear technologies. Well-known names include Cameco, a major uranium producer, and Duke Energy, a large U.S. utility company. Someone might invest in NUKZ to seek long-term growth from the global shift toward cleaner energy and to get diversified exposure to many nuclear-related companies at once. A key risk is that it is heavily focused on the nuclear sector, so its price can swing more than the overall market.
How much will it cost me?The Range Nuclear Renaissance Index ETF (NUKZ) has an expense ratio of 0.85%, meaning you’ll pay $8.50 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average because it is actively managed, focusing on a specialized sector like nuclear energy, which requires more research and expertise to select investments.
What would affect this ETF?The Range Nuclear Renaissance Index ETF (NUKZ) could benefit from growing global demand for clean energy and advancements in nuclear technology, as governments and industries prioritize decarbonization. However, it may face challenges from regulatory hurdles, public concerns about nuclear safety, and competition from other renewable energy sources. Its global exposure and focus on sectors like Industrials and Utilities position it well for long-term growth, but economic conditions and geopolitical risks could impact its top holdings and overall performance.

NUKZ Top 10 Holdings

NUKZ is firmly hitched to the nuclear-energy wagon, with a heavy tilt toward industrial and utility names across a global mix of U.S., European, and Japanese players. Cameco has been losing steam lately, acting as a bit of a brake despite its solid long-term story. On the brighter side, GE Vernova and Quanta Services are rising and helping pull the fund forward, while Lockheed Martin adds steady, defense-linked momentum. Endesa provides a more stable utility anchor, smoothing out some of the bumps from lagging names like Rolls-Royce.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Cameco9.95%$85.16MC$73.47B190.22%
71
Outperform
GE Vernova Inc.3.40%$29.12M$266.88B204.01%
69
Neutral
Endesa SA3.02%$25.86M€39.15B47.18%
63
Neutral
Talen Energy Corp2.92%$24.97M$15.72B66.88%
60
Neutral
2.88%$24.63M
Rolls-Royce Holdings2.85%$24.38M£106.03B67.96%
71
Outperform
2.81%$24.05M
Vistra Corp2.73%$23.40M$54.03B37.54%
65
Neutral
Dominion Energy2.71%$23.17M$54.69B14.40%
63
Neutral
Duke Energy2.65%$22.70M$99.50B2.56%
70
Outperform

NUKZ Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Positive
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
70.18
Positive
100DMA
69.37
Positive
200DMA
66.58
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
1.23
Negative
RSI
64.32
Neutral
STOCH
71.68
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For NUKZ, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 72.32, equal to the 50-day MA of 70.18, and equal to the 200-day MA of 66.58, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 1.23 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 64.32 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 71.68 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for NUKZ.

NUKZ Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$857.17M0.85%
53
Neutral
$996.98M0.75%
73
Outperform
$986.31M0.40%
63
Neutral
$982.15M0.55%
65
Neutral
$891.54M0.50%
65
Neutral
$744.32M0.47%
58
Neutral
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
NUKZ
Range Nuclear Renaissance Index ETF
76.23
33.59
78.78%
IVES
Dan IVES Wedbush AI Revolution ETF
GII
SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF
BKGI
BNY Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF
BUG
Global X Cybersecurity Etf
IHAK
iShares Cybersecurity & Tech ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement