Education
About Us
Working with TipRanks
Follow Us
NUKZ - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
Range Nuclear Renaissance Index ETF (NUKZ)
Rating:58Neutral
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Strong Recent Performance
The ETF has delivered solid gains so far this year and over the past month, showing positive momentum in its strategy.
Leading Nuclear and Industrial Holdings
Several of the largest positions, including key nuclear and industrial companies, have shown strong performance, helping support the fund’s returns.
Global Exposure Within a Focused Theme
Holdings spread across the U.S., Canada, Japan, the UK, and other markets provide some geographic diversification while still targeting the nuclear renaissance theme.
Negative Factors
High Expense Ratio
The fund charges a relatively high fee, which can eat into long-term returns compared with lower-cost ETFs.
Sector Concentration Risk
Heavy weighting in industrials, utilities, and energy means the ETF is vulnerable if these sectors face a downturn.
Not All Top Holdings Are Performing Well
At least one major holding has shown weak performance this year, which can drag on the fund despite strength in other stocks.
NUKZ vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM809.53M
RegionGlobal
Expense Ratio0.85%
Beta1.35
IssuerRange
Inception DateJan 24, 2024
Dividend Yield0.84%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedVettaFi Nuclear Renaissance Index - Benchmark TR Gross
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume104,421
30 Day Avg. Volume129,414
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
81.18Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering40
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
NUKZ Summary
Range Nuclear Renaissance Index ETF (NUKZ) is an exchange-traded fund that follows the VettaFi Nuclear Renaissance Index, focusing on the theme of nuclear energy. It holds companies involved in uranium mining, nuclear reactors, and related technology, with major positions in well-known names like Constellation Energy and Lockheed Martin. Investors might consider NUKZ if they want targeted exposure to the potential long-term growth of nuclear power and to diversify within the clean energy space. A key risk is that it is heavily concentrated in one sector, so its price can swing more than the overall stock market.
How much will it cost me?The Range Nuclear Renaissance Index ETF (NUKZ) has an expense ratio of 0.85%, meaning you’ll pay $8.50 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average because it is actively managed, focusing on a specialized sector like nuclear energy, which requires more research and expertise to select investments.
What would affect this ETF?The Range Nuclear Renaissance Index ETF (NUKZ) could benefit from growing global demand for clean energy and advancements in nuclear technology, as governments and industries prioritize decarbonization. However, it may face challenges from regulatory hurdles, public concerns about nuclear safety, and competition from other renewable energy sources. Its global exposure and focus on sectors like Industrials and Utilities position it well for long-term growth, but economic conditions and geopolitical risks could impact its top holdings and overall performance.
NUKZ Top 10 Holdings
NUKZ is riding the nuclear revival with Cameco as its key engine: the uranium giant has been steadily rising over the past few months and is a major driver of returns. Industrial names like GE Vernova, Quanta Services, Honeywell, Curtiss-Wright, and Mitsubishi Heavy are also climbing, giving the fund a strong backbone in equipment, engineering, and advanced manufacturing. On the flip side, Constellation Energy looks mixed and Silex Systems is clearly lagging, acting as a small drag. The portfolio is globally diversified but tightly focused on nuclear and related industrials.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cameco | 10.55% | $86.88M | C$64.52B | 154.11% | 71 Outperform | |
| Constellation Energy Corporation | 6.92% | $56.99M | $109.24B | 39.41% | 68 Neutral | |
| Lockheed Martin | 3.68% | $30.28M | $148.63B | 38.58% | 70 Outperform | |
| GE Vernova Inc. | 3.60% | $29.62M | $216.98B | 156.68% | 69 Neutral | |
| Quanta Services | 3.47% | $28.58M | $83.64B | 114.34% | 78 Outperform | |
| Curtiss-Wright | 3.07% | $25.28M | $24.19B | 103.32% | 74 Outperform | |
| Rolls-Royce Holdings | 2.97% | $24.44M | £102.31B | 55.00% | 71 Outperform | |
| Honeywell International | 2.96% | $24.36M | $149.07B | 11.95% | 77 Outperform | |
| Endesa SA | 2.84% | $23.35M | €37.37B | 57.86% | 63 Neutral | |
| PG&E | 2.69% | $22.13M | $39.87B | 8.10% | 69 Neutral |
NUKZ Technical Analysis
Neutral
―
Price Trends
70.28
Negative
68.30
Positive
63.75
Positive
Market Momentum
-0.46
Positive
45.07
Neutral
24.18
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For NUKZ, the sentiment is Neutral. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 71.08, equal to the 50-day MA of 70.28, and equal to the 200-day MA of 63.75, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of -0.46 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 45.07 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 24.18 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Neutral sentiment for NUKZ.
NUKZ Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
NUKZ
Range Nuclear Renaissance Index ETF
68.87
28.18
69.26%
CRBN
iShares MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target ETF
―
―
―
BLOK
Amplify Transformational Data Sharing Etf
―
―
―
IVES
Dan IVES Wedbush AI Revolution ETF
―
―
―
BUG
Global X Cybersecurity Etf
―
―
―
GII
SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
Disclaimer
This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents