NANC - ETF AI Analysis

Top Page

Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF (NANC)

Rating:74Outperform

Price Target:―

NANC’s rating reflects a generally solid portfolio led by large, high-quality tech names like Nvidia, Alphabet, Microsoft, and Apple, whose strong financial performance and long-term growth in AI, cloud, and services support the fund’s overall quality. However, holdings such as Philip Morris and Artivion, which face leverage, financial, and valuation concerns, modestly weigh on the rating. The main risk factor is the fund’s heavy tilt toward a handful of major tech companies, which can increase sensitivity to that sector’s volatility and high valuations.

Positive Factors

Large, Established Top Holdings

The ETF’s biggest positions include well-known, financially strong companies, which can provide a more stable core for the portfolio.

Sector Diversification Across the Economy

Holdings spread across technology, communication services, health care, consumer sectors, financials, and more help reduce the impact of weakness in any single industry.

Meaningful Exposure to Strong Tech Names

A sizable allocation to leading technology companies, including some that have shown strong recent performance, can support growth potential over time.

Negative Factors

High Expense Ratio

The fund’s relatively high annual fee means more of the investment return is eaten up by costs compared with many low-cost ETFs.

Recent Weak Overall Performance

The ETF has shown slightly negative returns over the past month, three months, and year to date, indicating recent performance has been soft.

Concentration in U.S. Tech and a Few Large Positions

With almost all assets in U.S. stocks and a heavy tilt toward technology and a handful of big holdings, the fund is vulnerable if these areas fall out of favor.

NANC vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

AUM251.85M

RegionGlobal

Expense Ratio0.72%

Beta1.12

IssuerSubversive

Inception DateFeb 07, 2023

Dividend Yield0.22%

Asset ClassEquity

Index TrackedNo Underlying Index

Share Statistics

EPS (TTM)N/A

Shares OutstandingN/A

10 Day Avg. Volume21,566

30 Day Avg. Volume27,549

Financial Highlights & Ratios

PEG RatioN/A

Price to Book (P/B)N/A

Price to Sales (P/S)N/A

P/FCF RatioN/A

Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A

Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A

Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A

Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A

Forecast

1Y Price Target

56.23

Price Target Upside― Downside

Rating ConsensusStrong Buy

Number of Analyst Covering100

EPS Forecast (FY)N/A

Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A

NANC Summary

NANC is the Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF, which builds a U.S. stock portfolio based on the publicly disclosed trades of Democratic members of Congress, rather than tracking a traditional index. It mainly holds large, well-known companies such as Nvidia and Microsoft, with a strong tilt toward technology and other major U.S. sectors. Someone might invest in NANC to seek growth and diversification while following a unique, politically themed strategy. A key risk is that the fund is heavily tilted toward tech and can go up or down sharply with both the stock market and changes in political sentiment.

How much will it cost me?The expense ratio for the Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF (Ticker: NANC) is 0.74%, which means you’ll pay $7.40 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average because it is actively managed, requiring more research and oversight to track the trading activities of Democratic members of Congress.

What would affect this ETF?The NANC ETF, with significant exposure to technology and communication services sectors, could benefit from continued innovation and growth in these industries, as well as favorable global economic conditions. However, its reliance on trades influenced by Democratic congressional members may expose it to political risks, regulatory changes, or shifts in public sentiment that could negatively impact its performance. Additionally, fluctuations in the performance of top holdings like Nvidia and Microsoft could also drive the ETF's future outcomes.

NANC Top 10 Holdings

NANC is leaning heavily into Big Tech, with Nvidia at the top pulling the fund higher as its AI story keeps powering ahead. Applied Materials is another bright spot, riding the semiconductor wave and giving the portfolio extra lift. On the flip side, Microsoft and Amazon have been losing a bit of altitude lately, acting as mild brakes rather than engines. Alphabet and Apple are more mixed but generally steady, helping smooth the ride. While the ETF is technically global, its top drivers are U.S. tech giants, making it a bet on America’s digital economy.

Name	Company Name	Weight %	Market Value	Market Cap	Yearly Gain	Overall Rating
NVDA	Nvidia	10.55%	$26.91M	$4.45T	58.45%	76 Outperform
GOOG	Alphabet Class C	6.26%	$15.97M	$3.67T	84.06%	82 Outperform
MSFT	Microsoft	6.24%	$15.92M	$2.98T	6.10%	79 Outperform
AMZN	Amazon	4.76%	$12.13M	$2.25T	8.07%	71 Outperform
AAPL	Apple	4.13%	$10.54M	$3.75T	21.98%	79 Outperform
AMAT	Applied Materials	3.60%	$9.18M	$267.66B	124.92%	77 Outperform
NFLX	Netflix	3.31%	$8.46M	$398.19B	5.95%	73 Outperform
PM	Philip Morris	3.11%	$7.92M	$267.75B	14.29%	61 Neutral
AXP	American Express	2.83%	$7.23M	$207.28B	17.73%	80 Outperform
COST	Costco	2.76%	$7.03M	$445.13B	12.65%	72 Outperform

NANC Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment

Negative

Last Price―

Price Trends

50DMA

45.28

Negative

100DMA

45.43

Negative

200DMA

44.02

Negative

Market Momentum

MACD

-0.41

Positive

RSI

35.24

Neutral

STOCH

28.10

Neutral

Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For NANC, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 44.45, equal to the 50-day MA of 45.28, and equal to the 200-day MA of 44.02, indicating a bearish trend. The MACD of -0.41 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 35.24 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 28.10 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for NANC.

NANC Peer Comparison

Comparison Results

Name	Price	Price Target	AUM	Expense Ratio	Overall Rating
NANC	―	―	$251.85M	0.72%	74 Outperform
RGEF	―	―	$759.48M	0.55%	70 Neutral
KAT	―	―	$713.33M	0.75%	61 Neutral
DWLD	―	―	$528.89M	0.62%	60 Neutral
HOLA	―	―	$282.35M	0.50%	69 Neutral
JSTC	―	―	$260.51M	0.89%	61 Neutral

Performance Comparison

NANC

Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF

43.37

6.65

18.11%

RGEF

Rockefeller Global Equity ETF

―

KAT

Scharf ETF

―

DWLD

Davis Select Worldwide Etf

―

HOLA

JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF

―

JSTC

Adasina Social Justice All Cap Global ETF

―

Glossary

BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Disclaimer

This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―

Table of Contents