tiprankstipranks
Trending News
More News >
Advertisement

NANC - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

NANC

Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF (NANC)

Rating:70Outperform
Price Target:
$49.00
The ETF NANC demonstrates a solid overall rating, driven by strong contributions from holdings like Nvidia (NVDA) and Alphabet (GOOG). Nvidia's strategic focus on AI and data center expansion positions it well for long-term growth, while Alphabet benefits from robust profitability and strategic investments in AI and cloud services, despite some short-term volatility. However, weaker holdings like Artivion (AORT), which faces financial challenges, and Philip Morris (PM), with high leverage and valuation concerns, may have slightly weighed on the fund's overall performance. Investors should also note the ETF's concentration in technology-focused companies, which could pose sector-specific risks.
Positive Factors
Strong Top Holdings
Several key stocks, including Nvidia and Netflix, have delivered strong year-to-date performance, boosting the ETF's returns.
Sector Diversification
The ETF is spread across multiple sectors like Technology, Health Care, and Consumer Cyclical, reducing reliance on any single industry.
Healthy Year-to-Date Performance
The fund has shown solid year-to-date growth, indicating strong overall momentum.
Negative Factors
High Expense Ratio
The ETF charges a relatively high expense ratio compared to many other funds, which can eat into investor returns over time.
Over-Concentration in Technology
With over 40% of the portfolio in Technology, the fund is heavily reliant on the performance of this single sector.
Limited Geographic Exposure
The ETF is almost entirely focused on U.S. companies, offering little diversification across global markets.

NANC vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

NANC Summary

The Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF (Ticker: NANC) is a unique investment fund that tracks the trading activities of Democratic members of Congress. It includes a mix of companies across various industries, with a strong focus on technology, healthcare, and communication services. Some of its top holdings are well-known companies like Nvidia and Microsoft. Investors might consider NANC for its innovative approach to leveraging political insights and its potential for diversification across sectors. However, new investors should be aware that this ETF’s performance is heavily influenced by the U.S. stock market and the trading decisions of political figures, which can be unpredictable.
How much will it cost me?The expense ratio for the Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF (Ticker: NANC) is 0.74%, which means you’ll pay $7.40 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average because it is actively managed, requiring more research and oversight to track the trading activities of Democratic members of Congress.
What would affect this ETF?The NANC ETF, with significant exposure to technology and communication services sectors, could benefit from continued innovation and growth in these industries, as well as favorable global economic conditions. However, its reliance on trades influenced by Democratic congressional members may expose it to political risks, regulatory changes, or shifts in public sentiment that could negatively impact its performance. Additionally, fluctuations in the performance of top holdings like Nvidia and Microsoft could also drive the ETF's future outcomes.

NANC Top 10 Holdings

The NANC ETF leans heavily into the technology sector, with Nvidia and Microsoft among its top holdings. Nvidia has been a steady performer year-to-date, driven by its AI and data center focus, though recent momentum has cooled. Microsoft, on the other hand, has faced mixed results, with its cloud and AI strengths offset by valuation concerns. Alphabet is a bright spot, riding bullish momentum thanks to strong growth in AI and cloud services. Meanwhile, Salesforce is dragging the fund with bearish momentum and stretched valuations. Overall, the fund’s tech-heavy tilt makes it sensitive to the sector’s ups and downs.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Nvidia10.17%$26.41M$4.44T33.33%
76
Outperform
Microsoft7.18%$18.64M$3.52T10.75%
73
Outperform
Alphabet Class C6.35%$16.49M$3.84T87.96%
82
Outperform
Amazon4.97%$12.91M$2.42T8.86%
71
Outperform
Apple4.29%$11.15M$4.08T17.38%
80
Outperform
Artivion3.40%$8.84M$2.17B59.84%
61
Neutral
3.29%$8.54M
American Express3.24%$8.41M$245.18B16.48%
81
Outperform
Salesforce2.86%$7.42M$215.93B-33.91%
71
Outperform
Philip Morris2.76%$7.17M$235.15B14.20%
62
Neutral

NANC Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Positive
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
45.16
Positive
100DMA
44.05
Positive
200DMA
41.07
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
-0.15
Positive
RSI
53.04
Neutral
STOCH
47.20
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For NANC, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 45.50, equal to the 50-day MA of 45.16, and equal to the 200-day MA of 41.07, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of -0.15 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 53.04 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 47.20 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for NANC.

NANC Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$255.75M0.74%
70
Outperform
$721.10M0.55%
71
Outperform
$702.39M0.75%
66
Neutral
$472.14M0.63%
62
Neutral
$258.78M0.59%
74
Outperform
$245.76M0.89%
60
Neutral
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
NANC
Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF
45.52
5.67
14.23%
RGEF
Rockefeller Global Equity ETF
KAT
Scharf ETF
DWLD
Davis Select Worldwide Etf
FMAG
Fidelity Magellan ETF
JSTC
Adasina Social Justice All Cap Global ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Disclaimer

This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement