tiprankstipranks
Trending News
More News >
Advertisement

NANC - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

NANC

Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF (NANC)

Rating:74Outperform
Price Target:
NANC’s rating reflects a portfolio led by large, financially strong tech names like Alphabet, Microsoft, Nvidia, Apple, and Meta, whose solid earnings, leadership in AI and cloud, and generally positive long-term outlooks support the fund’s quality. These strengths are partly offset by weaker spots such as Philip Morris and Artivion, where higher leverage, financial challenges, and bearish or cautious technical signals weigh on the overall picture. The main risk factor is the fund’s heavy tilt toward a handful of big technology and growth-oriented companies, which can increase volatility if that sector or style falls out of favor.
Positive Factors
Large, Established Top Holdings
The ETF’s biggest positions include well-known, financially strong companies, which can provide a more stable core for the portfolio.
Sector Diversification Across the Economy
Holdings spread across technology, communication services, health care, consumer sectors, financials, and more help reduce the impact of weakness in any single industry.
Meaningful Exposure to Strong Tech Names
A sizable allocation to leading technology companies, including some that have shown strong recent performance, can support growth potential over time.
Negative Factors
High Expense Ratio
The fund’s relatively high annual fee means more of the investment return is eaten up by costs compared with many low-cost ETFs.
Recent Weak Overall Performance
The ETF has shown slightly negative returns over the past month, three months, and year to date, indicating recent performance has been soft.
Concentration in U.S. Tech and a Few Large Positions
With almost all assets in U.S. stocks and a heavy tilt toward technology and a handful of big holdings, the fund is vulnerable if these areas fall out of favor.

NANC vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

NANC Summary

NANC is the Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF, which builds a U.S. stock portfolio based on the publicly disclosed trades of Democratic members of Congress, rather than tracking a traditional index. It mainly holds large, well-known companies such as Nvidia and Microsoft, with a strong tilt toward technology and other major U.S. sectors. Someone might invest in NANC to seek growth and diversification while following a unique, politically themed strategy. A key risk is that the fund is heavily tilted toward tech and can go up or down sharply with both the stock market and changes in political sentiment.
How much will it cost me?The expense ratio for the Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF (Ticker: NANC) is 0.74%, which means you’ll pay $7.40 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average because it is actively managed, requiring more research and oversight to track the trading activities of Democratic members of Congress.
What would affect this ETF?The NANC ETF, with significant exposure to technology and communication services sectors, could benefit from continued innovation and growth in these industries, as well as favorable global economic conditions. However, its reliance on trades influenced by Democratic congressional members may expose it to political risks, regulatory changes, or shifts in public sentiment that could negatively impact its performance. Additionally, fluctuations in the performance of top holdings like Nvidia and Microsoft could also drive the ETF's future outcomes.

NANC Top 10 Holdings

This ETF leans heavily on U.S. Big Tech, with Nvidia, Microsoft, Alphabet, Amazon, and Apple steering the ship. Alphabet and Amazon have been the steadier engines lately, helping to keep performance on track, while Nvidia is more mixed, with long-term AI optimism battling short-term choppiness. Apple looks like it’s losing steam, and Salesforce has been a clear drag, weighing on recent returns. Applied Materials has quietly been a bright spot, adding some semiconductor spark to a portfolio that, despite its “global” label, is largely driven by U.S. tech and consumer names.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Nvidia10.53%$27.18M$4.57T39.78%
76
Outperform
Alphabet Class C6.09%$15.72M$3.67T67.18%
82
Outperform
Microsoft6.07%$15.67M$2.97T-2.39%
79
Outperform
Amazon4.53%$11.69M$2.20T-5.41%
71
Outperform
Apple4.08%$10.53M$3.88T6.12%
79
Outperform
Applied Materials3.75%$9.67M$293.12B115.04%
77
Outperform
Philip Morris3.38%$8.71M$284.36B18.85%
61
Neutral
American Express3.14%$8.10M$237.73B16.00%
80
Outperform
Artivion2.84%$7.33M$1.78B34.46%
58
Neutral
Costco2.71%$7.00M$442.13B-4.81%
72
Outperform

NANC Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Neutral
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
45.69
Negative
100DMA
45.48
Negative
200DMA
43.59
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
-0.33
Positive
RSI
45.35
Neutral
STOCH
49.03
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For NANC, the sentiment is Neutral. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 45.33, equal to the 50-day MA of 45.69, and equal to the 200-day MA of 43.59, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of -0.33 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 45.35 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 49.03 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Neutral sentiment for NANC.

NANC Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$258.11M0.72%
$767.69M0.55%
$717.97M0.75%
$541.14M0.63%
$278.93M0.30%
$269.11M0.89%
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
NANC
Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF
44.94
5.55
14.09%
RGEF
Rockefeller Global Equity ETF
KAT
Scharf ETF
DWLD
Davis Select Worldwide Etf
HOLA
JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF
JSTC
Adasina Social Justice All Cap Global ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Disclaimer

This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement