NANC - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF (NANC)
Rating:73Outperform
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Large, Established Top Holdings
The ETF’s biggest positions include well-known, financially strong companies, which can provide a more stable core for the portfolio.
Sector Diversification Across the Economy
Holdings spread across technology, communication services, health care, consumer sectors, financials, and more help reduce the impact of weakness in any single industry.
Meaningful Exposure to Strong Tech Names
A sizable allocation to leading technology companies, including some that have shown strong recent performance, can support growth potential over time.
Negative Factors
High Expense Ratio
The fund’s relatively high annual fee means more of the investment return is eaten up by costs compared with many low-cost ETFs.
Recent Weak Overall Performance
The ETF has shown slightly negative returns over the past month, three months, and year to date, indicating recent performance has been soft.
Concentration in U.S. Tech and a Few Large Positions
With almost all assets in U.S. stocks and a heavy tilt toward technology and a handful of big holdings, the fund is vulnerable if these areas fall out of favor.
NANC vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM241.42M
RegionGlobal
Expense Ratio0.72%
Beta1.12
IssuerSubversive
Inception DateFeb 07, 2023
Dividend Yield0.22%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedNo Underlying Index
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume18,875
30 Day Avg. Volume25,435
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
54.43Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusStrong Buy
Number of Analyst Covering99
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
NANC Summary
NANC is the Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF, which builds a U.S. stock portfolio based on the publicly disclosed trades of Democratic members of Congress, rather than tracking a traditional index. It mainly holds large, well-known companies such as Nvidia and Microsoft, with a strong tilt toward technology and other major U.S. sectors. Someone might invest in NANC to seek growth and diversification while following a unique, politically themed strategy. A key risk is that the fund is heavily tilted toward tech and can go up or down sharply with both the stock market and changes in political sentiment.
How much will it cost me?The expense ratio for the Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF (Ticker: NANC) is 0.74%, which means you’ll pay $7.40 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average because it is actively managed, requiring more research and oversight to track the trading activities of Democratic members of Congress.
What would affect this ETF?The NANC ETF, with significant exposure to technology and communication services sectors, could benefit from continued innovation and growth in these industries, as well as favorable global economic conditions. However, its reliance on trades influenced by Democratic congressional members may expose it to political risks, regulatory changes, or shifts in public sentiment that could negatively impact its performance. Additionally, fluctuations in the performance of top holdings like Nvidia and Microsoft could also drive the ETF's future outcomes.
NANC Top 10 Holdings
NANC may follow Democratic lawmakers, but its story right now is classic Big Tech with a twist. Nvidia sits in the driver’s seat yet has been losing altitude lately, weighing on returns alongside a softer Alphabet and a Microsoft that’s been noticeably lagging. Amazon and Apple are also catching their breath rather than sprinting, so the tech-heavy tilt isn’t fully paying off. Bright spots like Applied Materials and a recently rising Netflix help cushion the blow, but overall the fund feels concentrated in U.S. mega-cap tech with only modest diversification elsewhere.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nvidia | 10.24% | $24.23M | $4.33T | 84.94% | 76 Outperform | |
| Alphabet Class C | 6.01% | $14.23M | $3.69T | 107.35% | 82 Outperform | |
| Microsoft | 5.95% | $14.08M | $2.76T | 5.00% | 79 Outperform | |
| Amazon | 4.89% | $11.59M | $2.29T | 25.26% | 71 Outperform | |
| Apple | 4.23% | $10.00M | $3.72T | 47.02% | 79 Outperform | |
| Applied Materials | 3.66% | $8.66M | $281.18B | 174.74% | 77 Outperform | |
| Netflix | 3.44% | $8.14M | $417.23B | 13.53% | 73 Outperform | |
| Philip Morris | 3.19% | $7.55M | $245.16B | 5.54% | 61 Neutral | |
| American Express | 2.92% | $6.92M | $210.81B | 32.69% | 80 Outperform | |
| Artivion | 2.90% | $6.87M | $1.69B | 58.72% | 58 Neutral |
NANC Technical Analysis
Negative
―
Price Trends
44.22
Negative
44.96
Negative
44.23
Negative
Market Momentum
-0.59
Negative
47.25
Neutral
80.43
Negative
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For NANC, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 42.92, equal to the 50-day MA of 44.22, and equal to the 200-day MA of 44.23, indicating a bearish trend. The MACD of -0.59 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 47.25 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 80.43 is Negative, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for NANC.
NANC Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
NANC
Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF
43.02
7.86
22.35%
RGEF
Rockefeller Global Equity ETF
―
―
―
KAT
Scharf ETF
―
―
―
DWLD
Davis Select Worldwide Etf
―
―
―
HOLA
JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF
―
―
―
JSTC
Adasina Social Justice All Cap Global ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents