tiprankstipranks
Advertisement

NANC - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

NANC

Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF (NANC)

Rating:73Outperform
Price Target:
NANC, the Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF, earns a solid overall rating thanks to large positions in high-quality tech leaders like Nvidia, Alphabet (Google), and Microsoft, which all show strong financial performance and promising long-term growth in AI and cloud services. Holdings such as Apple, Amazon, and Netflix further support the fund with robust profitability and growth potential, though several of these names appear richly valued and show signs of short-term technical weakness. Stocks like Philip Morris, which faces high leverage and a bearish technical outlook, slightly weigh on the rating, and the fund’s heavy tilt toward a handful of major tech companies adds concentration risk if that sector stumbles.
Positive Factors
Strong Recent Short-Term Performance
The ETF has shown strong gains over the past month, suggesting recent positive momentum.
Leading Growth Companies in Top Holdings
Several major technology and internet names among the largest positions have delivered strong results this year, helping support the fund’s overall performance.
Broad Sector Mix Within U.S. Stocks
Holdings spread across technology, communication services, health care, consumer, financials, and other sectors help reduce the impact of weakness in any single industry.
Negative Factors
High Expense Ratio
The fund’s relatively high annual fee means more of the returns are eaten up by costs compared with many low-cost ETFs.
Heavy Tilt Toward Technology
A large share of assets in the technology sector increases the fund’s sensitivity to swings in tech stocks.
Mixed Performance Among Top Holdings
Several of the largest positions have shown weak or negative performance this year, which can drag on the ETF’s overall returns if the trend continues.

NANC vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

NANC Summary

NANC is the Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF, which follows the stock picks of Democratic members of Congress rather than a traditional market index. It mainly holds large U.S. companies, with a big focus on technology and communication services. Well-known holdings include Nvidia and Alphabet (Google), along with other major names like Microsoft and Amazon. Someone might invest in NANC to get diversified exposure to many leading U.S. companies while also following a unique political theme. A key risk is that it is heavily tilted toward tech and can go up and down sharply with that sector and the overall market.
How much will it cost me?The expense ratio for the Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF (Ticker: NANC) is 0.74%, which means you’ll pay $7.40 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average because it is actively managed, requiring more research and oversight to track the trading activities of Democratic members of Congress.
What would affect this ETF?The NANC ETF, with significant exposure to technology and communication services sectors, could benefit from continued innovation and growth in these industries, as well as favorable global economic conditions. However, its reliance on trades influenced by Democratic congressional members may expose it to political risks, regulatory changes, or shifts in public sentiment that could negatively impact its performance. Additionally, fluctuations in the performance of top holdings like Nvidia and Microsoft could also drive the ETF's future outcomes.

NANC Top 10 Holdings

NANC is leaning heavily into Big Tech, with Nvidia, Amazon, Alphabet, and Microsoft doing most of the heavy lifting. Nvidia and Amazon are the clear engines right now, riding strong momentum in AI and cloud to push the fund higher. Alphabet and Apple look steady to rising, adding support without much drama, while Microsoft’s more mixed stretch has taken a bit of shine off the tech cluster. Outside tech, names like Philip Morris and Artivion have been lagging, but they’re smaller weights in this mostly U.S.-centric, growth-tilted portfolio.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Nvidia11.11%$29.21M$5.06T99.22%
76
Outperform
Alphabet Class C6.54%$17.19M$4.15T114.58%
82
Outperform
Microsoft6.16%$16.20M$3.15T8.60%
79
Outperform
Amazon5.55%$14.61M$2.84T39.12%
71
Outperform
Apple4.04%$10.63M$3.98T27.35%
79
Outperform
Applied Materials4.02%$10.58M$330.97B168.49%
77
Outperform
Netflix3.04%$7.99M$389.43B-17.71%
73
Outperform
Philip Morris2.87%$7.56M$255.91B-4.89%
61
Neutral
American Express2.74%$7.20M$214.31B20.34%
80
Outperform
Artivion2.69%$7.06M$1.83B56.05%
58
Neutral

NANC Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Positive
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
44.36
Positive
100DMA
45.05
Positive
200DMA
44.60
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
0.87
Negative
RSI
62.25
Neutral
STOCH
65.67
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For NANC, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 45.35, equal to the 50-day MA of 44.36, and equal to the 200-day MA of 44.60, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 0.87 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 62.25 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 65.67 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for NANC.

NANC Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$262.36M0.72%
73
Outperform
$783.85M0.55%
71
Outperform
$707.56M0.75%
64
Neutral
$562.03M0.62%
60
Neutral
$278.53M0.50%
68
Neutral
$271.95M0.89%
61
Neutral
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
NANC
Unusual Whales Subversive Democratic Trading ETF
46.53
10.22
28.15%
RGEF
Rockefeller Global Equity ETF
KAT
Scharf ETF
DWLD
Davis Select Worldwide Etf
HOLA
JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF
JSTC
Adasina Social Justice All Cap Global ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement