KWEB - ETF AI Analysis

Top Page

Kraneshares Csi China Internet Etf (KWEB)

Rating:71Outperform

Price Target:―

The ETF KWEB has a solid overall rating, reflecting its focus on leading Chinese internet companies. Strong contributors to the fund's performance include Tencent Holdings, which benefits from robust growth in gaming and AI-driven initiatives, and Kanzhun Ltd, which excels in revenue and profit growth supported by successful AI integration. However, holdings like Baidu face challenges such as declining revenue and operational difficulties, which slightly weigh on the fund's rating. A key risk factor is the ETF's concentration in the Chinese internet sector, which may expose it to regulatory and market-specific pressures.

Positive Factors

Strong Top Holdings

Several key positions, such as Alibaba and Tencent Music, have delivered strong year-to-date performance, supporting the ETF's overall returns.

Sector Focus on Growth Areas

The ETF is heavily weighted in high-growth sectors like Communication Services and Consumer Cyclical, which can benefit from long-term trends.

Healthy Asset Base

With significant assets under management, the ETF demonstrates investor confidence and stability.

Negative Factors

High Geographic Concentration

The ETF is heavily focused on Hong Kong and U.S. markets, limiting diversification across other global regions.

Mixed Performance in Top Holdings

Some major holdings, such as JD.com and Meituan, have underperformed year-to-date, which could weigh on overall returns.

Relatively High Expense Ratio

The ETF's expense ratio is higher than many other funds, which can reduce net returns for investors over time.

KWEB vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

AUM8.51B

RegionAsia-Pacific

Expense Ratio0.70%

Beta0.92

IssuerKraneShares

Inception DateJul 31, 2013

Dividend YieldN/A

Asset ClassEquity

Index TrackedCSI Overseas China Internet

Share Statistics

EPS (TTM)N/A

Shares OutstandingN/A

10 Day Avg. Volume16,854,967

30 Day Avg. Volume21,274,141

Financial Highlights & Ratios

PEG RatioN/A

Price to Book (P/B)N/A

Price to Sales (P/S)N/A

P/FCF RatioN/A

Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A

Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A

Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A

Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A

Forecast

1Y Price Target

46.62

Price Target Upside― Downside

Rating ConsensusStrong Buy

Number of Analyst Covering31

EPS Forecast (FY)N/A

Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A

KWEB Summary

The KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB) is an investment fund that focuses on China's fast-growing internet sector. It includes companies involved in e-commerce, social media, online entertainment, and cloud computing. Some well-known companies in the fund are Alibaba and Tencent. KWEB follows the CSI Overseas China Internet Index, giving investors exposure to the digital transformation happening in China, where over 1 billion people use the internet. This ETF could be a good choice for those looking to invest in growth and innovation within the global digital economy. However, it’s important to know that KWEB is heavily tied to the Chinese market, which can be volatile and influenced by government regulations.

How much will it cost me?The expense ratio for KWEB is 0.7%, which means you’ll pay $7 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average because KWEB is actively managed to focus on China's internet sector, requiring more research and specialized management.

What would affect this ETF?KWEB could benefit from China's growing internet user base and the rapid expansion of e-commerce, social media, and digital entertainment, which align with its focus on leading companies like Alibaba and Tencent. However, potential risks include regulatory changes in China's tech sector, geopolitical tensions affecting international investments, and economic slowdowns that could impact consumer spending in the region.

KWEB Top 10 Holdings

KWEB is heavily concentrated in China's internet sector, with major players like Tencent and Alibaba leading the charge. However, both stocks have been lagging recently, with bearish momentum weighing on their performance despite solid fundamentals. PDD Holdings is also struggling, facing competitive and regulatory pressures. On the brighter side, Meituan and Netease are showing signs of resilience, with steady growth in user engagement and successful product launches driving optimism. Overall, the fund's focus on e-commerce and digital services in China offers potential, but short-term headwinds are holding back some of its key names.

Name	Company Name	Weight %	Market Value	Market Cap	Yearly Gain	Overall Rating
0700	Tencent Holdings	10.30%	$893.43M	HK$5.56T	45.95%	75 Outperform
9988	Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.	8.84%	$766.62M	HK$2.77T	81.40%	70 Outperform
PDD	PDD Holdings	7.55%	$654.95M	$152.45B	10.05%	70 Outperform
3690	Meituan	7.22%	$626.28M	HK$627.66B	-35.17%	74 Outperform
9999	Netease Inc	6.05%	$525.01M	HK$658.27B	50.03%	80 Outperform
9961	Trip.com Group Ltd.	4.26%	$369.76M	HK$369.18B	0.90%	74 Outperform
BZ	Kanzhun Ltd Sponsored	4.03%	$349.82M	$10.85B	51.53%	78 Outperform
9618	JD.com, Inc. Class A	3.99%	$345.72M	HK$323.15B	-19.00%	74 Outperform
1024	Kuaishou Technology Class B	3.96%	$343.39M	HK$286.79B	55.09%	71 Outperform
TME	Tencent Music Entertainment Group	3.94%	$341.67M	$25.54B	48.87%	71 Outperform

KWEB Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment

Negative

Last Price―

Price Trends

50DMA

38.46

Negative

100DMA

38.81

Negative

200DMA

36.45

Positive

Market Momentum

MACD

-0.64

Positive

RSI

40.26

Neutral

STOCH

21.73

Neutral

Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For KWEB, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 37.04, equal to the 50-day MA of 38.46, and equal to the 200-day MA of 36.45, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of -0.64 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 40.26 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 21.73 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for KWEB.

KWEB Peer Comparison

Comparison Results

Name	Price	Price Target	AUM	Expense Ratio	Overall Rating
KWEB	―	―	$8.51B	0.70%	―
INCO	―	―	$279.49M	0.75%	―
CHIQ	―	―	$207.68M	0.65%	―
INQQ	―	―	$56.33M	0.86%	―
DGIN	―	―	$19.02M	0.74%	―
IOPP	―	―	$8.63M	0.73%	―

Performance Comparison

KWEB

Kraneshares Csi China Internet Etf

36.50

6.42

21.34%

INCO

Columbia India Consumer ETF

―

CHIQ

Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF

―

INQQ

India Internet & Ecommerce ETF

―

DGIN

VanEck Digital India ETF

―

IOPP

Simplify Tara India Opportunities ETF

―

Glossary

BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Disclaimer

This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―

Table of Contents