tiprankstipranks
Trending News
More News >
Advertisement

IWD - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

IWD

iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF (IWD)

Rating:72Outperform
Price Target:
IWD, the iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF, earns a solid overall rating because it holds many large, financially strong companies that are well positioned for long-term growth. Standout positions like Alphabet (both GOOGL and GOOG), JPMorgan Chase, Exxon Mobil, Johnson & Johnson, Walmart, and Micron support the fund with strong financial performance, positive earnings calls, and generally favorable technical trends. Some holdings such as Berkshire Hathaway, Amazon, and Procter & Gamble face issues like weaker technical momentum, premium valuations, or cash flow and market-share challenges, and the fund’s sizable exposure to a few mega-cap names and growth-oriented tech within a value strategy is a key risk to keep in mind.
Positive Factors
Broad Sector Diversification
The fund spreads its investments across many sectors, which helps reduce the impact if any one industry struggles.
Large, Established Top Holdings
Many of the biggest positions are well-known, financially strong companies that can provide stability to the portfolio.
Low Expense Ratio for a Large Fund
The ETF charges a relatively low fee for its size, so more of the fund’s returns stay in investors’ pockets.
Negative Factors
Heavy U.S. Concentration
Almost all of the fund’s assets are invested in U.S. companies, offering very limited international diversification.
Mixed Performance Among Top Holdings
Some of the largest positions have shown weak recent performance, which can drag on the fund even as others do well.
Significant Tilt Toward Financials
A large allocation to financial stocks means the fund can be more sensitive to problems in the banking and financial sector.

IWD vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

IWD Summary

IWD is the iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF, which follows the Russell 1000 Value Index. It focuses on large U.S. companies that are considered “value” stocks—shares that may be priced lower compared with their business fundamentals. The fund holds many well-known names such as Berkshire Hathaway and JPMorgan Chase, and it spreads your money across sectors like financials, health care, and technology. Someone might invest in IWD for broad diversification and potential long-term growth from established companies. A key risk is that value stocks can underperform the overall market and the ETF’s price can go up and down with market conditions.
How much will it cost me?The iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF (IWD) has an expense ratio of 0.18%, which means you’ll pay $1.80 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is lower than average because it’s a passively managed fund that tracks the Russell 1000 Value Index, keeping costs down compared to actively managed funds.
What would affect this ETF?The iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF could benefit from a stable U.S. economy and favorable conditions for large-cap value stocks, such as rising interest rates that may boost financial sector performance, which is the fund's largest sector exposure. However, economic slowdowns or regulatory changes affecting key holdings like Berkshire Hathaway, JPMorgan Chase, or Exxon Mobil could negatively impact the ETF's returns. Additionally, shifts in consumer behavior or technological disruptions could influence sectors like consumer cyclical and technology, which are significant parts of the portfolio.

IWD Top 10 Holdings

IWD leans heavily into classic U.S. value names, with financials, industrials, and old-guard tech setting the tone. Recently, Exxon Mobil, Johnson & Johnson, Walmart, Micron, and Procter & Gamble have been doing the heavy lifting, with energy strength, steady health care, and AI-linked chip demand giving the fund a solid backbone. Alphabet’s two share classes are more mixed, rising over the longer stretch but wobbling lately, while Amazon has been losing steam and Berkshire Hathaway looks subdued, keeping overall performance from really breaking away.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Berkshire Hathaway B2.98%$2.04B$1.08T0.68%
66
Neutral
JPMorgan Chase2.54%$1.74B$780.74B19.48%
72
Outperform
Exxon Mobil2.07%$1.42B$630.06B38.70%
74
Outperform
Alphabet Class A1.99%$1.36B$3.61T71.70%
85
Outperform
Johnson & Johnson1.87%$1.28B$579.34B44.22%
78
Outperform
Amazon1.82%$1.25B$2.29T7.01%
71
Outperform
Alphabet Class C1.62%$1.11B$3.61T69.73%
82
Outperform
Walmart1.57%$1.07B$986.71B34.98%
78
Outperform
Micron1.34%$916.92M$416.78B298.34%
79
Outperform
Procter & Gamble1.17%$799.70M$357.04B-12.68%
69
Neutral

IWD Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Negative
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
219.71
Negative
100DMA
212.59
Positive
200DMA
203.82
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
0.44
Positive
RSI
37.63
Neutral
STOCH
33.51
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For IWD, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 223.67, equal to the 50-day MA of 219.71, and equal to the 200-day MA of 203.82, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of 0.44 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 37.63 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 33.51 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for IWD.

IWD Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$69.55B0.18%
72
Outperform
$172.14B0.03%
72
Outperform
$49.77B0.18%
72
Outperform
$33.04B0.04%
72
Outperform
$16.87B0.06%
72
Outperform
$15.28B0.04%
72
Outperform
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
IWD
iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF
217.72
34.16
18.61%
VTV
Vanguard Value ETF
IVE
iShares S&P 500 Value ETF
SPYV
SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF
VONV
Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF
SCHV
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Disclaimer

This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement