IGM - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM)
Rating:75Outperform
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Strong Overall Year-to-Date Performance
The ETF has delivered strong gains so far this year, suggesting its tech-focused strategy has recently worked well for investors.
Leading Semiconductor and AI Exposure
Several major chip and AI-related holdings, such as Micron, AMD, and Nvidia, have shown strong performance, helping drive the fund’s returns.
High Concentration in Established Tech Leaders
Large positions in well-known companies like Apple, Microsoft, Alphabet, and Meta give investors exposure to many of the biggest names in the technology sector.
Negative Factors
Heavy Concentration in a Single Sector
With most of its assets in technology and related industries, the fund is highly sensitive to downturns in the tech sector.
Limited Geographic Diversification
Almost all of the ETF’s holdings are in U.S. companies, which means it offers little protection if the U.S. market struggles.
Mixed Performance Among Top Holdings
Some large positions, including Microsoft and Meta, have shown weak recent performance, which can offset gains from stronger holdings.
IGM vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM10.67B
RegionNorth America
Expense Ratio0.37%
Beta1.48
IssueriShares
Inception DateMar 13, 2001
Dividend Yield0.14%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedS&P North American Expanded Technology Sector Index
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume394,690
30 Day Avg. Volume514,460
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
189.39Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusStrong Buy
Number of Analyst Covering294
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
IGM Summary
The iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM) is a fund that tracks the S&P North American Expanded Technology Sector Index, giving you broad exposure to U.S. and Canadian technology companies. It holds many well-known names like Apple and Microsoft, along with chip makers such as Nvidia, aiming to capture the growth of software, semiconductors, and internet businesses. Someone might invest in IGM to seek long-term growth and to easily diversify across many leading tech firms in a single investment. A key risk is that it is heavily focused on technology, so its price can rise and fall sharply with the tech sector.
How much will it cost me?The iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM) has an expense ratio of 0.39%, meaning you’ll pay $3.90 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is slightly higher than average because it is a sector-focused ETF, which often requires more active management compared to broad-market index funds.
What would affect this ETF?The iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM) could benefit from continued innovation and growth in the technology sector, driven by advancements in artificial intelligence, cloud computing, and semiconductor development, particularly from top holdings like Apple, Microsoft, and Nvidia. However, it may face challenges from rising interest rates, which can negatively impact tech valuations, and regulatory scrutiny targeting major tech companies in North America. Global economic uncertainty could also influence the performance of its heavily concentrated tech and communication services exposure.
IGM Top 10 Holdings
IGM is riding a powerful North American tech wave, with Apple setting the pace as a clear leader and Nvidia and Broadcom adding extra fuel from the semiconductor side, even if their recent moves have been a bit mixed. Microsoft and Meta, on the other hand, have been losing some steam lately, acting as mild brakes on the fund’s momentum. Micron and AMD are surging and help offset those laggards, underscoring how heavily this ETF leans on Big Tech and chipmakers, with performance largely tied to the fortunes of a concentrated U.S.-centric tech universe.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Microsoft | 10.05% | $1.09B | $3.45T | -4.22% | 79 Outperform | |
| Nvidia | 8.93% | $964.63M | $4.86T | 22.58% | 76 Outperform | |
| Broadcom | 8.62% | $931.24M | $1.85T | 40.26% | 76 Outperform | |
| Apple | 8.58% | $927.63M | $4.54T | 36.62% | 79 Outperform | |
| Alphabet Class A | 4.41% | $477.01M | $4.36T | 75.90% | 85 Outperform | |
| Meta Platforms | 4.39% | $473.91M | $1.42T | -23.03% | 76 Outperform | |
| Micron | 4.16% | $449.68M | $929.52B | 638.14% | 79 Outperform | |
| Alphabet Class C | 3.55% | $383.59M | $4.36T | 74.91% | 82 Outperform | |
| Advanced Micro Devices | 3.44% | $371.73M | $776.41B | 179.79% | 73 Outperform | |
| Intel | 2.10% | $226.50M | $454.97B | 409.52% | 64 Neutral |
IGM Technical Analysis
Positive
―
Price Trends
159.06
Positive
148.42
Positive
138.42
Positive
Market Momentum
0.88
Negative
59.72
Neutral
86.56
Negative
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For IGM, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 156.09, equal to the 50-day MA of 159.06, and equal to the 200-day MA of 138.42, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 0.88 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 59.72 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 86.56 is Negative, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for IGM.
IGM Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
IGM
iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF
163.72
46.88
40.12%
IGV
iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF
―
―
―
EMLP
First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund
―
―
―
NANR
SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF
―
―
―
IGE
iShares North American Natural Resources ETF
―
―
―
FTWO
Strive FAANG 2.0 ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents