Education
About Us
Working with TipRanks
Follow Us
HAP - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
VanEck Natural Resources ETF (HAP)
Rating:57Neutral
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Broad Natural Resources Mix
Holdings span materials, energy, and industrial names, giving investors exposure to multiple resource-related industries.
Strong Recent Momentum
The ETF’s one-month, three-month, and year-to-date returns have been strong, signaling solid near-term performance.
Leading Blue-Chip Holdings
Top positions like Exxon Mobil, Chevron, Deere, and BHP have delivered strong gains, supporting the fund’s results.
Negative Factors
Heavy U.S. Concentration
More than two-thirds of assets sit in U.S. companies, limiting diversification across other regions.
Sector Concentration Risk
Materials and energy dominate the portfolio, so a downturn in commodity markets could hit the fund hard.
Moderate Expense Ratio
The 0.42% fee is higher than many broad-market ETFs, which can eat into returns over time.
HAP vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM289.10M
RegionGlobal
Expense Ratio0.42%
Beta0.61
IssuerVanEck
Inception DateAug 29, 2008
Dividend Yield1.84%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedMarketVector Global Natural Resources Index
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume26,057
30 Day Avg. Volume27,736
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
73.11Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering111
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
HAP Summary
The VanEck Natural Resources ETF (HAP) tracks the MarketVector Global Natural Resources Index and focuses on companies tied to energy, metals, agriculture, and timber. It holds well-known names like Exxon Mobil and Chevron, as well as firms involved in farming and mining, giving you a simple way to invest in the global demand for raw materials. Someone might consider HAP for diversification and potential growth if commodity prices rise over time. However, this ETF can be volatile because it is heavily linked to natural resource and commodity price swings, which can go up and down sharply.
How much will it cost me?This ETF has an expense ratio of 0.42%, which means you’ll pay about $4.20 per year for every $1,000 invested. That’s higher than the cost of a typical broad, passively managed index ETF because this is a more specialized, sector-focused fund that requires more research and management.
What would affect this ETF?HAP could benefit if global growth and infrastructure spending increase demand for energy, metals, and agriculture, supporting companies like Exxon Mobil, Chevron, Deere, and BHP, and if clean-energy policies help utilities such as NextEra and Iberdrola. On the other hand, weaker economic conditions, falling commodity prices, stricter environmental rules, or rapid shifts away from fossil fuels could hurt its energy and materials holdings and weigh on overall performance.
HAP Top 10 Holdings
HAP is leaning heavily on old-school resource giants, with Exxon, Chevron, and Shell acting as the main engines of performance as energy stocks keep climbing on solid earnings and cash flows. Deere and Corteva add an agriculture twist, rising but facing some bumps from softer farm equipment demand and competitive pressures. BHP and Nutrien bring in the metals and fertilizer angle, also trending higher and giving the fund a broad commodity backbone. With a global mix of holdings and a clear tilt toward energy, materials, and agriculture, this ETF lives and dies by the natural resources cycle.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deere | 5.80% | $16.51M | $160.82B | 35.21% | 66 Neutral | |
| Exxon Mobil | 5.19% | $14.77M | $635.44B | 32.36% | 74 Outperform | |
| Chevron | 5.02% | $14.27M | $370.23B | 17.11% | 71 Outperform | |
| NextEra Energy | 3.75% | $10.67M | $190.06B | 30.20% | 71 Outperform | |
| Bayer | 3.47% | $9.88M | €45.00B | 95.45% | 54 Neutral | |
| Iberdrola | 3.46% | $9.86M | €133.92B | 48.12% | 67 Neutral | |
| Corteva | 2.83% | $8.04M | $51.51B | 21.59% | 75 Outperform | |
| BHP Group | 2.69% | $7.65M | $186.65B | 52.69% | 73 Outperform | |
| Nutrien | 2.35% | $6.69M | $33.99B | 36.40% | ― | |
| Agnico Eagle | 2.14% | $6.09M | $110.59B | 146.68% | ― |
HAP Technical Analysis
Positive
―
Price Trends
66.27
Positive
61.63
Positive
56.93
Positive
Market Momentum
2.09
Positive
72.58
Negative
89.89
Negative
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For HAP, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 71.06, equal to the 50-day MA of 66.27, and equal to the 200-day MA of 56.93, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 2.09 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 72.58 is Negative, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 89.89 is Negative, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for HAP.
HAP Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
HAP
VanEck Natural Resources ETF
74.15
27.63
59.39%
IVES
Dan IVES Wedbush AI Revolution ETF
―
―
―
NUKZ
Range Nuclear Renaissance Index ETF
―
―
―
MGNR
American Beacon GLG Natural Resources ETF
―
―
―
CCNR
CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF
―
―
―
FTRI
First Trust Indxx Global Natural Resources Income ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
Disclaimer
This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents