tiprankstipranks
Advertisement

CCNR - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

CCNR

CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF (CCNR)

Rating:58Neutral
Price Target:
CCNR’s rating suggests it is a solid but not top-tier natural resources ETF, with its quality supported by strong holdings like INPEX, which combines robust financial performance, attractive valuation, and strong momentum, and Kubota, which benefits from bullish technical trends and stable fundamentals. Additional support comes from companies such as BHP and Boliden, which show strong profitability and reasonable valuations, though some face short-term bearish or overbought technical signals that add risk. The main risk factor is the fund’s focus on commodity-related and energy names, where technical weakness or overbought conditions in several holdings could lead to higher short-term volatility.
Positive Factors
Strong Recent Performance
The ETF has shown strong gains so far this year and in recent months, indicating positive momentum in its natural resources holdings.
Broad Global Diversification
Holdings spread across the U.S., Canada, Australia, Japan, and several European markets help reduce reliance on any single country’s economy.
Multiple Commodity-Linked Sectors
Exposure to energy, materials, and related sectors provides diversified access to different parts of the natural resources market rather than relying on just one industry.
Negative Factors
Heavy Energy and Materials Exposure
A large portion of the portfolio is concentrated in energy and materials stocks, which can make the fund more sensitive to swings in commodity prices.
Moderate Expense Ratio
The fund’s expense ratio is not especially low, so fees may take a noticeable bite out of returns compared with the cheapest ETFs.
Sector-Specific Risk
Because the ETF focuses on natural resources rather than the broader stock market, its performance can lag when commodity-related sectors fall out of favor.

CCNR vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

CCNR Summary

The CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF (CCNR) is a fund that focuses on the theme of natural resources instead of tracking a traditional stock index. It holds companies involved in energy, metals, and agriculture from around the world, giving you exposure to the materials that power the global economy. Well-known names in the fund include BHP Group and Nutrien. An investor might consider CCNR to diversify a stock portfolio and as a potential hedge against inflation, since resource prices can rise with costs. A key risk is that natural resource prices are cyclical, so the ETF’s value can swing up and down sharply over time.
How much will it cost me?The CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF (CCNR) has an expense ratio of 0.39%, which means you’ll pay $3.90 per year for every $1,000 invested. This expense ratio is slightly higher than average because the fund is actively managed to provide specialized exposure to the natural resources sector. Active management often involves higher costs due to the research and strategy required.
What would affect this ETF?The CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF (CCNR) could benefit from rising global demand for materials and energy as economies grow and infrastructure projects expand, especially in emerging markets. However, it may face challenges from fluctuating commodity prices, regulatory changes in mining and energy sectors, or a slowdown in global economic growth, which could reduce demand for natural resources. Additionally, shifts in energy policies toward renewables might impact traditional energy holdings within the ETF.

CCNR Top 10 Holdings

CCNR is leaning hard into global natural resources, with a clear tilt toward energy and materials names that set the tone for performance. BHP and ENI have been doing the heavy lifting, rising steadily and giving the fund a solid backbone, while SM Energy has been more of a high-octane engine, powering recent gains. On the flip side, INPEX and Nutrien have been lagging, taking some shine off the portfolio. With holdings spread across North America, Europe, and Asia, this ETF is a globally diversified bet on the commodities cycle.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Boliden AB1.53%$5.83Mkr155.02B76.97%
72
Outperform
First Solar1.40%$5.34M$29.98B71.95%
75
Outperform
INPEX1.26%$4.79M¥4.41T70.63%
79
Outperform
Nutrien1.22%$4.65M$32.30B12.47%
BHP Group Ltd1.20%$4.58MAU$311.14B79.84%
68
Neutral
Enphase Energy1.18%$4.49M$7.39B31.48%
61
Neutral
Kubota1.17%$4.47M¥3.28T81.82%
76
Outperform
1.16%$4.43M
1.14%$4.36M
SM Energy1.10%$4.19M$7.72B29.25%
72
Outperform

CCNR Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Negative
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
40.82
Negative
100DMA
39.74
Negative
200DMA
35.21
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
-0.19
Positive
RSI
34.97
Neutral
STOCH
9.72
Positive
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For CCNR, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 41.21, equal to the 50-day MA of 40.82, and equal to the 200-day MA of 35.21, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of -0.19 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 34.97 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 9.72 is Positive, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for CCNR.

CCNR Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$381.47M0.39%
58
Neutral
$893.83M0.75%
57
Neutral
$477.30M0.85%
56
Neutral
$456.79M0.58%
65
Neutral
$120.72M0.44%
60
Neutral
$111.28M0.50%
59
Neutral
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
CCNR
CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF
39.22
13.96
55.27%
MGNR
American Beacon GLG Natural Resources ETF
BITQ
Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF
ALAI
Alger AI Enablers & Adopters ETF
TURF
T. Rowe Price Natural Resource ETF
CSNR
Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement