GVIP - ETF AI Analysis

Top Page

Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF (GVIP)

Rating:70Neutral

Price Target:―

The Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF (GVIP) has a solid overall rating, reflecting a mix of strong performers and some weaker holdings. Micron (MU) stands out as a key driver of the fund's rating due to its robust financial performance, strategic positioning in AI markets, and positive earnings momentum. On the other hand, Echostar (SATS) has weighed on the ETF's score due to its poor financial performance and unattractive valuation. A notable risk for the fund is its exposure to holdings with valuation concerns, which could impact future growth potential.

Positive Factors

Strong Top Holdings

Several of the ETF's largest positions, such as Merus and Alibaba, have delivered strong year-to-date gains, supporting overall performance.

Sector Diversification

The ETF is spread across multiple sectors, including Technology, Consumer Cyclical, and Financials, reducing reliance on any single industry.

Reasonable Expense Ratio

The fund's expense ratio of 0.45% is competitive compared to actively managed ETFs, helping investors retain more of their returns.

Negative Factors

High Geographic Concentration

With over 96% exposure to U.S. companies, the ETF lacks significant international diversification, increasing sensitivity to domestic market conditions.

Mixed Performance in Top Holdings

Some key holdings, like UnitedHealth, have underperformed year-to-date, which could drag on the fund's overall returns.

Sector Overweight in Technology

The ETF has a heavy allocation to Technology, making it more vulnerable to volatility in this high-growth sector.

GVIP vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

AUM440.47M

RegionNorth America

Expense Ratio0.45%

Beta1.18

IssuerGoldman Sachs

Inception DateNov 01, 2016

Dividend Yield0.33%

Asset ClassEquity

Index TrackedGoldman Sachs Hedge Fund VIP Index

Share Statistics

EPS (TTM)N/A

Shares OutstandingN/A

10 Day Avg. Volume10,198

30 Day Avg. Volume9,427

Financial Highlights & Ratios

PEG RatioN/A

Price to Book (P/B)N/A

Price to Sales (P/S)N/A

P/FCF RatioN/A

Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A

Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A

Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A

Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A

Forecast

1Y Price Target

181.65

Price Target Upside― Downside

Rating ConsensusStrong Buy

Number of Analyst Covering49

EPS Forecast (FY)N/A

Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A

GVIP Summary

The Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF (GVIP) is a fund that lets you invest in the top stock picks of leading hedge fund managers. It follows the Goldman Sachs Hedge Fund VIP Index, which tracks the most commonly held U.S. stocks by these experts. Some well-known companies in the fund include Tesla and Alphabet (Google). This ETF is a great option for those looking to diversify their portfolio and benefit from the strategies of successful hedge funds. However, it’s important to know that the fund’s performance can go up and down with the market, and it is heavily influenced by sectors like technology and consumer cyclical.

How much will it cost me?The Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF (GVIP) has an expense ratio of 0.45%, meaning you’ll pay $4.50 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average for ETFs because it is actively managed, aiming to replicate the strategies of top hedge fund managers.

What would affect this ETF?GVIP's focus on U.S. stocks and its significant exposure to sectors like Technology and Consumer Cyclical could benefit from innovation trends and strong consumer spending, especially if economic conditions remain favorable. However, the ETF may face challenges from rising interest rates or regulatory changes that impact hedge fund strategies or key holdings like Tesla and Alphabet. Additionally, sector-specific risks, such as volatility in tech or healthcare, could negatively affect performance.

GVIP Top 10 Holdings

The Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF (GVIP) leans heavily into U.S. equities, with a clear tilt toward technology and communication services, which together make up nearly 40% of the fund. Alphabet is steady but not surging, as its AI and cloud investments show promise but face cost pressures. Meanwhile, Warner Bros. Discovery is rising on streaming and box office momentum, though revenue growth remains a hurdle. On the lagging side, Teva Pharmaceutical struggles with financial challenges despite technical momentum. Overall, the fund’s thematic concentration in innovation and consumer-driven sectors shapes its performance story.

Name	Company Name	Weight %	Market Value	Market Cap	Yearly Gain	Overall Rating
SATS	Echostar	3.13%	$13.91M	$30.79B	363.59%	57 Neutral
CVNA	Carvana Co	2.74%	$12.16M	$96.06B	97.08%	66 Neutral
ABVX	Abivax SA Sponsored ADR	2.60%	$11.54M	$11.21B	1797.00%	60 Neutral
APP	AppLovin	2.57%	$11.43M	$245.86B	109.82%	74 Outperform
WBD	Warner Bros	2.50%	$11.12M	$72.44B	175.24%	68 Neutral
TEVA	Teva Pharmaceutical	2.46%	$10.95M	$36.22B	40.32%	63 Neutral
COF	Capital One Financial	2.32%	$10.30M	$157.83B	36.14%	71 Outperform
CRH	CRH plc	2.30%	$10.20M	£63.16B	24.04%	76 Outperform
MU	Micron	2.29%	$10.18M	$322.66B	219.17%	79 Outperform
NTRA	Natera	2.27%	$10.10M	$32.58B	47.54%	73 Outperform

GVIP Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment

Positive

Last Price―

Price Trends

50DMA

152.50

Positive

100DMA

149.68

Positive

200DMA

138.56

Positive

Market Momentum

MACD

0.87

Negative

RSI

59.70

Neutral

STOCH

49.91

Neutral

Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For GVIP, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 153.72, equal to the 50-day MA of 152.50, and equal to the 200-day MA of 138.56, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 0.87 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 59.70 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 49.91 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for GVIP.

GVIP Peer Comparison

Comparison Results

Name	Price	Price Target	AUM	Expense Ratio	Overall Rating
GVIP	―	―	$440.47M	0.45%	―
PLDR	―	―	$880.66M	0.60%	―
SYLD	―	―	$866.72M	0.59%	―
ABFL	―	―	$776.39M	0.49%	―
PFM	―	―	$755.12M	0.52%	―
AUSF	―	―	$755.00M	0.27%	―

Performance Comparison

GVIP

Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF

156.58

31.43

25.11%

PLDR

Putnam Sustainable Leaders ETF

―

SYLD

Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF

―

ABFL

Fcf Us Quality Etf

―

PFM

Invesco Dividend Achievers ETF

―

AUSF

Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF

―

Glossary

BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Disclaimer

This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―

Table of Contents