tiprankstipranks
Trending News
More News >
Advertisement

GVIP - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

GVIP

Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF (GVIP)

Rating:68Neutral
Price Target:
The Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF (GVIP) has a solid overall rating, reflecting its exposure to high-performing companies like Alphabet (GOOGL) and Broadcom (AVGO). Alphabet contributes positively with its strong financial performance and strategic investments in AI and cloud services, while Broadcom benefits from its leadership in AI semiconductors and infrastructure software. However, weaker holdings like Echostar (SATS), which struggles with financial losses and high leverage, and Insmed (INSM), impacted by negative profitability and valuation concerns, weigh on the fund's overall score. A key risk factor is the potential overvaluation of several top holdings, which could affect future performance.
Positive Factors
Strong Top Holdings
Several of the ETF's largest positions, such as Merus and Alibaba, have delivered strong year-to-date gains, supporting overall performance.
Sector Diversification
The ETF is spread across multiple sectors, including Technology, Consumer Cyclical, and Financials, reducing reliance on any single industry.
Reasonable Expense Ratio
The fund's expense ratio of 0.45% is competitive compared to actively managed ETFs, helping investors retain more of their returns.
Negative Factors
High Geographic Concentration
With over 96% exposure to U.S. companies, the ETF lacks significant international diversification, increasing sensitivity to domestic market conditions.
Mixed Performance in Top Holdings
Some key holdings, like UnitedHealth, have underperformed year-to-date, which could drag on the fund's overall returns.
Sector Overweight in Technology
The ETF has a heavy allocation to Technology, making it more vulnerable to volatility in this high-growth sector.

GVIP vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

GVIP Summary

The Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF (GVIP) is a fund that lets you invest in the top stock picks of leading hedge fund managers. It follows the Goldman Sachs Hedge Fund VIP Index, which tracks the most commonly held U.S. stocks by these experts. Some well-known companies in the fund include Tesla and Alphabet (Google). This ETF is a great option for those looking to diversify their portfolio and benefit from the strategies of successful hedge funds. However, it’s important to know that the fund’s performance can go up and down with the market, and it is heavily influenced by sectors like technology and consumer cyclical.
How much will it cost me?The Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF (GVIP) has an expense ratio of 0.45%, meaning you’ll pay $4.50 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average for ETFs because it is actively managed, aiming to replicate the strategies of top hedge fund managers.
What would affect this ETF?GVIP's focus on U.S. stocks and its significant exposure to sectors like Technology and Consumer Cyclical could benefit from innovation trends and strong consumer spending, especially if economic conditions remain favorable. However, the ETF may face challenges from rising interest rates or regulatory changes that impact hedge fund strategies or key holdings like Tesla and Alphabet. Additionally, sector-specific risks, such as volatility in tech or healthcare, could negatively affect performance.

GVIP Top 10 Holdings

The Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF (GVIP) leans heavily into U.S. equities, with a notable tilt toward technology and consumer cyclical sectors. Alphabet is rising steadily, buoyed by its AI and cloud investments, while Eli Lilly’s robust pipeline advancements keep it in the spotlight despite valuation concerns. On the flip side, UnitedHealth is lagging, weighed down by high medical costs and membership declines. Alibaba’s mixed performance reflects global uncertainties, while Western Digital’s strategic positioning in AI markets adds a spark to the fund’s tech-heavy lineup. Overall, GVIP’s focus on hedge fund favorites creates a dynamic but concentrated portfolio.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Carvana Co2.44%$10.39M$86.77B55.96%
66
Neutral
AppLovin2.39%$10.17M$231.09B80.38%
74
Outperform
Natera2.31%$9.83M$33.41B43.21%
68
Neutral
Alphabet Class A2.24%$9.53M$3.84T83.98%
80
Outperform
Teva Pharmaceutical2.18%$9.27M$32.38B59.43%
63
Neutral
Broadcom2.17%$9.23M$1.80T123.52%
76
Outperform
Echostar2.16%$9.17M$21.45B211.26%
44
Neutral
CRH plc2.15%$9.16M£60.86B11.32%
76
Outperform
Capital One Financial2.12%$9.02M$146.03B23.79%
65
Neutral
Meta Platforms2.12%$9.00M$1.67T8.64%
78
Outperform

GVIP Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Positive
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
152.59
Positive
100DMA
148.15
Positive
200DMA
136.96
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
0.08
Negative
RSI
54.81
Neutral
STOCH
89.80
Negative
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For GVIP, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 151.28, equal to the 50-day MA of 152.59, and equal to the 200-day MA of 136.96, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 0.08 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 54.81 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 89.80 is Negative, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for GVIP.

GVIP Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$423.63M0.45%
$873.27M0.59%
$860.33M0.60%
$784.82M0.49%
$743.14M0.52%
$739.46M0.27%
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
GVIP
Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF
153.44
24.14
18.67%
SYLD
Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF
PLDR
Putnam Sustainable Leaders ETF
ABFL
Fcf Us Quality Etf
PFM
Invesco Dividend Achievers ETF
AUSF
Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Disclaimer

This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement