tiprankstipranks
Advertisement

GSIB - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

GSIB

Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF (GSIB)

Rating:71Outperform
Price Target:
GSIB, the Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF, earns a solid overall rating because it holds many large, profitable global banks with positive earnings trends and generally favorable technical signals. Strong contributors like Wells Fargo, Bank of China, and Bank of New York Mellon support the fund’s quality through robust financial performance, attractive valuations, and strategic initiatives in areas like AI and digital assets, while some holdings such as Citigroup and Goldman Sachs face issues like overbought technical conditions and financial challenges that slightly weigh on the rating. The main risk factor is the fund’s concentration in major global banks, which makes it sensitive to sector-specific issues such as credit costs, leverage, and real estate or macroeconomic stresses.
Positive Factors
Strong Recent Performance
The ETF has shown solid gains over the past three months, indicating positive recent momentum.
Generally Strong Top Holdings
Most of the largest bank holdings have delivered strong year-to-date results, helping support the fund’s overall performance.
Moderate Expense Ratio
The fund’s fee is reasonable for a specialized financial-sector ETF, allowing investors to keep more of their returns compared with many niche products.
Negative Factors
Heavy Sector Concentration
With almost all assets in financial stocks, the ETF is highly exposed to downturns in the banking and financial sector.
Limited Geographic Diversification
The portfolio is dominated by U.S. banks with additional exposure concentrated in just a few other countries, reducing the benefits of broader global diversification.
Small Asset Base
The relatively low assets under management may lead to lower trading liquidity and potentially wider bid-ask spreads for investors.

GSIB vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

GSIB Summary

The Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF (GSIB) focuses on some of the world’s largest and most important banks, mainly in the financial sector. It does not track a traditional index, but instead targets “too big to fail” style banks that are central to the global financial system. Well-known holdings include Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley. Someone might invest in this ETF to get diversified exposure to major global banks that could benefit from long-term economic growth. A key risk is that it is heavily concentrated in financial stocks, so its price can rise or fall sharply with the banking sector.
How much will it cost me?The Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF (GSIB) has an expense ratio of 0.35%, meaning you’ll pay $3.50 per year for every $1,000 invested. This cost is slightly higher than average for ETFs because it is actively managed, focusing on a niche sector of global systemically important banks.
What would affect this ETF?The GSIB ETF could benefit from global economic growth and increased financial activity, as well as regulatory measures that enhance the stability of systemically important banks. However, it may face challenges from rising interest rates, economic slowdowns, or geopolitical tensions that could disrupt global banking operations and profitability.

GSIB Top 10 Holdings

GSIB is essentially a who’s who of global megabanks, with Chinese giants like Industrial & Commercial Bank of China and China Construction Bank doing much of the heavy lifting thanks to steady, upward-trending share prices and attractive valuations. Bank of China and Bank of Communications are also pulling their weight, though real estate and margin pressures keep a lid on enthusiasm. On the weaker side, Japanese leaders such as Mitsubishi UFJ and Sumitomo Mitsui, along with HSBC and Toronto-Dominion, have been lagging lately. Overall, it’s a tightly focused, globally diversified bet on systemically important banks.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
State Street3.69%$1.04M$36.57B74.18%
75
Outperform
Wells Fargo3.68%$1.04M$252.25B31.68%
80
Outperform
Morgan Stanley3.67%$1.04M$267.44B67.91%
76
Outperform
Bank of China3.65%$1.03MHK$1.96T14.15%
77
Outperform
Bank of America3.65%$1.03M$360.84B43.53%
72
Outperform
Citigroup3.64%$1.03M$204.90B99.30%
68
Neutral
JPMorgan Chase3.63%$1.03M$802.10B37.13%
72
Outperform
Goldman Sachs Group3.62%$1.02M$256.44B86.96%
73
Outperform
Bank of New York Mellon3.60%$1.02M$85.60B69.55%
75
Outperform
Agricultural Bank of China3.59%$1.02MHK$2.61T34.62%
76
Outperform

GSIB Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Positive
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
52.48
Negative
100DMA
51.80
Positive
200DMA
48.55
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
-0.28
Negative
RSI
56.00
Neutral
STOCH
94.79
Negative
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For GSIB, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 50.00, equal to the 50-day MA of 52.48, and equal to the 200-day MA of 48.55, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of -0.28 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 56.00 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 94.79 is Negative, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for GSIB.

GSIB Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$27.84M0.35%
71
Outperform
$95.78M0.50%
72
Outperform
$95.74M0.65%
68
Neutral
$90.12M1.00%
68
Neutral
$89.01M0.50%
57
Neutral
$45.65M0.80%
71
Outperform
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
GSIB
Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF
52.11
18.80
56.44%
FDCF
Fidelity Disruptive Communications ETF
TCAI
Tortoise AI Infrastructure ETF
FFND
Future Fund Active ETF
CSNR
Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF
BCFN
Baron Financials ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement