GSIB - ETF AI Analysis

Top Page

Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF (GSIB)

Rating:70Outperform

Price Target:―

The Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF (GSIB) has a solid overall rating, driven by strong holdings like China Construction Bank (HK:0939), which benefits from robust financial performance, strategic growth in green and digital finance, and attractive valuation metrics. However, some holdings, such as Societe Generale (FR:GLE), face challenges in cash flow management and neutral technical trends, which may slightly weigh on the ETF's rating. A potential risk to consider is the concentration in the banking sector, which could expose the fund to industry-specific challenges like narrowing net interest margins and real estate market risks.

Positive Factors

Strong Year-to-Date Performance

The ETF has delivered solid gains so far this year, indicating strong overall momentum.

Global Exposure

The fund includes holdings from multiple countries, providing diversification beyond the U.S. market.

Reasonable Expense Ratio

The ETF charges a relatively low fee, making it cost-effective compared to many actively managed funds.

Negative Factors

Sector Concentration

With over 96% exposure to financials, the ETF is highly sensitive to risks in the banking sector.

Weak Recent Performance

The fund has declined over the past month, which may signal short-term volatility or challenges in the financial sector.

Overweight U.S. Exposure

Nearly 74% of the fund is invested in U.S. companies, limiting diversification across global markets.

GSIB vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

AUM23.68M

RegionGlobal

Expense Ratio0.35%

Beta0.86

IssuerThemes

Inception DateDec 15, 2023

Dividend YieldN/A

Asset ClassEquity

Index TrackedNo Underlying Index

Share Statistics

EPS (TTM)N/A

Shares OutstandingN/A

10 Day Avg. Volume7,797

30 Day Avg. Volume8,998

Financial Highlights & Ratios

PEG RatioN/A

Price to Book (P/B)N/A

Price to Sales (P/S)N/A

P/FCF RatioN/A

Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A

Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A

Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A

Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A

Forecast

1Y Price Target

63.13

Price Target Upside― Downside

Rating ConsensusModerate Buy

Number of Analyst Covering28

EPS Forecast (FY)N/A

Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A

GSIB Summary

The Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF (GSIB) focuses on investing in major global banks that are essential to the financial system. These banks, such as Morgan Stanley and Wells Fargo, are large, interconnected institutions that play a critical role in the global economy. The ETF provides exposure to the financial sector, with a strong emphasis on stability and growth potential, making it a good option for investors seeking diversification and a stake in the backbone of global finance. However, new investors should be aware that the ETF is heavily concentrated in the financial sector, meaning its performance can be significantly impacted by changes in the banking industry or economic conditions.

How much will it cost me?The Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF (GSIB) has an expense ratio of 0.35%, meaning you’ll pay $3.50 per year for every $1,000 invested. This cost is slightly higher than average for ETFs because it is actively managed, focusing on a niche sector of global systemically important banks.

What would affect this ETF?The GSIB ETF could benefit from global economic growth and increased financial activity, as well as regulatory measures that enhance the stability of systemically important banks. However, it may face challenges from rising interest rates, economic slowdowns, or geopolitical tensions that could disrupt global banking operations and profitability.

GSIB Top 10 Holdings

The GSIB ETF is heavily concentrated in the financial sector, with a global mix of systemically important banks driving its performance. Chinese banks like Industrial & Commercial Bank of China and Bank of China are steady performers, benefiting from robust revenue growth and attractive valuations, though challenges in the real estate sector remain a headwind. Meanwhile, Toronto Dominion Bank and Barclays are rising stars, supported by strong earnings and strategic digital investments. Societe Generale’s mixed performance, with impressive revenue growth but cash flow concerns, adds a touch of volatility to the fund’s otherwise stable positioning.

Name	Company Name	Weight %	Market Value	Market Cap	Yearly Gain	Overall Rating
BCS	Barclays	3.82%	$898.51K	$82.37B	78.05%	77 Outperform
TD	Toronto Dominion Bank	3.77%	$887.51K	$154.26B	73.33%	75 Outperform
RY	Royal Bank Of Canada	3.68%	$867.12K	$232.00B	34.30%	75 Outperform
SMFG	Sumitomo Mitsui	3.67%	$865.23K	$123.56B	33.90%	76 Outperform
GS	Goldman Sachs Group	3.67%	$864.87K	$266.32B	51.72%	73 Outperform
MS	Morgan Stanley	3.66%	$861.19K	$283.55B	37.79%	76 Outperform
GLE	Societe Generale	3.65%	$859.07K	€42.13B	134.74%	72 Outperform
STT	State Street	3.64%	$856.54K	$35.66B	27.95%	75 Outperform
SAN	Banco Santander SA	3.62%	$851.49K	$168.32B	137.70%	72 Outperform
WFC	Wells Fargo	3.58%	$843.37K	$291.18B	29.06%	80 Outperform

GSIB Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment

Positive

Last Price―

Price Trends

50DMA

48.82

Positive

100DMA

47.79

Positive

200DMA

43.83

Positive

Market Momentum

MACD

1.03

Negative

RSI

72.45

Negative

STOCH

86.82

Negative

Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For GSIB, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 50.25, equal to the 50-day MA of 48.82, and equal to the 200-day MA of 43.83, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 1.03 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 72.45 is Negative, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 86.82 is Negative, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for GSIB.

GSIB Peer Comparison

Comparison Results

Name	Price	Price Target	AUM	Expense Ratio	Overall Rating
GSIB	―	―	$23.68M	0.35%	―
FFND	―	―	$94.57M	1.00%	―
AIFD	―	―	$87.46M	0.75%	―
HECO	―	―	$72.47M	0.90%	―
FMED	―	―	$64.46M	0.50%	―
IQM	―	―	$64.06M	0.50%	―

Performance Comparison

GSIB

Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF

52.59

19.48

58.83%

FFND

Future Fund Active ETF

―

AIFD

TCW Artificial Intelligence ETF

―

HECO

SPDR Galaxy Hedged Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF

―

FMED

Fidelity Disruptive Medicine ETF

―

IQM

Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF

―

Glossary

BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Disclaimer

This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―

Table of Contents