tiprankstipranks
Trending News
More News >
Advertisement

GSEW - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

GSEW

Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSEW)

Rating:70Outperform
Price Target:
GSEW, the Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF, has an overall rating that suggests it offers a generally solid but not outstanding mix of holdings. Strong contributors like Western Digital, Texas Pacific Land, AMD, and Southern Copper support the fund’s quality through solid financial performance, positive earnings calls, and growth opportunities. However, weaker names such as AST SpaceMobile and FTAI, which face financial instability, cash flow issues, and valuation concerns, along with several holdings carrying high leverage or overvaluation risks, temper the overall rating and highlight the risk of exposure to companies with financial and technical pressures.
Positive Factors
Strong Top Holdings
Several of the largest positions, especially in technology and energy-related names, have shown strong year-to-date gains, helping support the fund’s overall performance.
Broad Sector Diversification
The ETF spreads its investments across many sectors, including technology, financials, industrials, and health care, which helps reduce the impact if any one industry struggles.
Low Expense Ratio
The fund charges a relatively low management fee, so less of your potential return is lost to ongoing costs.
Negative Factors
Heavy U.S. Concentration
Almost all of the ETF’s assets are invested in U.S. companies, offering very limited exposure to markets outside the United States.
Cyclical Sector Exposure
Meaningful weights in sectors like technology, consumer cyclical, and industrials can make the fund more sensitive to economic slowdowns and market swings.
Reliance on Recent Winners
The fund’s recent results lean on several very strong-performing holdings, which may increase risk if these specific stocks lose momentum.

GSEW vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

GSEW Summary

GSEW is the Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF. It tracks the Solactive US Large Cap Equal Weight Index, which holds many of the biggest U.S. companies but gives each stock roughly the same importance instead of letting a few giants dominate. It owns well-known names like Intel and AMD, along with companies from technology, finance, health care, and more. Someone might invest in GSEW for broad, diversified exposure to large U.S. companies and the long-term growth of the U.S. economy. A key risk is that its value can go up or down with the overall stock market.
How much will it cost me?The expense ratio for the Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSEW) is 0.09%, meaning you’ll pay $0.90 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is lower than average because the fund is passively managed, following an equal-weight index strategy that typically has lower costs compared to actively managed funds.
What would affect this ETF?The Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSEW) could benefit from positive trends in the U.S. economy, such as technological innovation and growth in sectors like technology and healthcare, which have significant weight in the fund. However, it may face challenges from rising interest rates, which could impact financial and real estate sectors, or economic slowdowns that affect consumer spending and cyclical industries. Its equal-weight strategy helps reduce concentration risk but may underperform during periods when a few large companies dominate market gains.

GSEW Top 10 Holdings

GSEW’s story is less about one superstar and more about a deep U.S. bench, but a few names still stand out. On the tech side, Intel and Western Digital have been rising, helped by improving sentiment around chips and data storage, while AMD looks steadier after a strong run, no longer sprinting ahead. SanDisk and CoreWeave show more mixed signals, with recent momentum cooling and holding back some of the fund’s tech punch. With all holdings U.S.-based and spread across sectors, no single name drives the bus, but semis and data-focused tech are clear tone-setters.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Lumentum Holdings0.28%$4.57M$42.43B732.64%
61
Neutral
Texas Pacific Land0.28%$4.47M$30.38B2.00%
76
Outperform
Vertiv Holdings0.27%$4.37M$93.05B131.86%
77
Outperform
Ubiquiti Networks0.26%$4.13M$42.80B113.03%
60
Neutral
Applied Materials0.25%$4.01M$293.12B110.12%
77
Outperform
Comfort Systems0.25%$3.96M$46.54B259.44%
80
Outperform
Ciena0.24%$3.93M$43.99B268.32%
70
Outperform
NRG Energy0.24%$3.88M$32.78B57.57%
69
Neutral
Vistra Corp0.24%$3.86M$57.79B5.71%
65
Neutral
Tapestry0.24%$3.83M$31.38B76.03%
69
Neutral

GSEW Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Positive
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
87.14
Positive
100DMA
85.63
Positive
200DMA
83.30
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
0.46
Negative
RSI
57.15
Neutral
STOCH
72.24
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For GSEW, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 88.16, equal to the 50-day MA of 87.14, and equal to the 200-day MA of 83.30, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 0.46 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 57.15 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 72.24 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for GSEW.

GSEW Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$1.62B0.09%
$9.34B0.05%
$9.02B0.34%
$8.76B0.68%
$8.34B0.52%
$8.18B0.61%
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
GSEW
Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF
88.96
10.84
13.88%
MGC
Vanguard Mega Cap ETF
PRF
Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1000 ETF
QQQI
NEOS Nasdaq 100 High Income ETF
FTCS
First Trust Capital Strength ETF
QYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Disclaimer

This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement