GSEW - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSEW)
Rating:70Outperform
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Strong Top Holdings
Several of the largest positions, especially in technology and energy-related names, have shown strong year-to-date gains, helping support the fund’s overall performance.
Broad Sector Diversification
The ETF spreads its investments across many sectors, including technology, financials, industrials, and health care, which helps reduce the impact if any one industry struggles.
Low Expense Ratio
The fund charges a relatively low management fee, so less of your potential return is lost to ongoing costs.
Negative Factors
Heavy U.S. Concentration
Almost all of the ETF’s assets are invested in U.S. companies, offering very limited exposure to markets outside the United States.
Cyclical Sector Exposure
Meaningful weights in sectors like technology, consumer cyclical, and industrials can make the fund more sensitive to economic slowdowns and market swings.
Reliance on Recent Winners
The fund’s recent results lean on several very strong-performing holdings, which may increase risk if these specific stocks lose momentum.
GSEW vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM1.61B
RegionNorth America
Expense Ratio0.09%
Beta0.85
IssuerGoldman Sachs
Inception DateSep 12, 2017
Dividend Yield1.51%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedSolactive US Large Cap Equal Weight Index (GTR)
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume74,330
30 Day Avg. Volume99,358
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
103.82Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering503
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
GSEW Summary
GSEW is the Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF. It tracks the Solactive US Large Cap Equal Weight Index, which holds many of the biggest U.S. companies but gives each stock roughly the same importance instead of letting a few giants dominate. It owns well-known names like Intel and AMD, along with companies from technology, finance, health care, and more. Someone might invest in GSEW for broad, diversified exposure to large U.S. companies and the long-term growth of the U.S. economy. A key risk is that its value can go up or down with the overall stock market.
How much will it cost me?The expense ratio for the Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSEW) is 0.09%, meaning you’ll pay $0.90 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is lower than average because the fund is passively managed, following an equal-weight index strategy that typically has lower costs compared to actively managed funds.
What would affect this ETF?The Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSEW) could benefit from positive trends in the U.S. economy, such as technological innovation and growth in sectors like technology and healthcare, which have significant weight in the fund. However, it may face challenges from rising interest rates, which could impact financial and real estate sectors, or economic slowdowns that affect consumer spending and cyclical industries. Its equal-weight strategy helps reduce concentration risk but may underperform during periods when a few large companies dominate market gains.
GSEW Top 10 Holdings
GSEW’s story is less about one superstar and more about a deep bench of U.S. large caps quietly pulling in the same direction. Tech and industrial names like Lumentum, Vertiv, Ciena, Corning, and Applied Materials are doing much of the heavy lifting, with rising or steadily positive trends tied to data centers, networking, and chip equipment. Comfort Systems adds an industrial boost, while NRG Energy and Tapestry are more mixed, occasionally losing steam. With its equal-weight approach and all-U.S. lineup, the fund avoids the usual Big Tech concentration and spreads its bets widely across sectors.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Venture Global, Inc. Class A | 0.29% | $4.55M | $36.49B | 32.59% | 58 Neutral | |
| SanDisk Corp | 0.26% | $4.18M | $111.25B | 1237.99% | 55 Neutral | |
| Cloudflare | 0.25% | $4.02M | $79.36B | 91.77% | 61 Neutral | |
| Dow Inc | 0.24% | $3.89M | $27.04B | 1.34% | 49 Neutral | |
| Samsara | 0.24% | $3.86M | $19.21B | -15.42% | 69 Neutral | |
| Micron | 0.24% | $3.76M | $519.68B | 352.41% | 79 Outperform | |
| Western Digital | 0.24% | $3.74M | $103.37B | 579.06% | 77 Outperform | |
| Ciena | 0.23% | $3.69M | $54.48B | 484.61% | 70 Outperform | |
| Marvell | 0.23% | $3.68M | $76.61B | 25.51% | 76 Outperform | |
| Devon Energy | 0.23% | $3.67M | $29.86B | 33.59% | 79 Outperform |
GSEW Technical Analysis
Negative
―
Price Trends
87.98
Negative
86.25
Negative
84.31
Positive
Market Momentum
-0.68
Positive
37.73
Neutral
21.59
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For GSEW, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 87.89, equal to the 50-day MA of 87.98, and equal to the 200-day MA of 84.31, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of -0.68 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 37.73 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 21.59 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for GSEW.
GSEW Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
GSEW
Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF
85.40
9.83
13.01%
QQQI
NEOS Nasdaq 100 High Income ETF
―
―
―
MGC
Vanguard Mega Cap ETF
―
―
―
PRF
Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1000 ETF
―
―
―
QYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
―
―
―
SPYI
NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents