Education
About Us
Working with TipRanks
Follow Us
GSEW - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSEW)
Rating:69Neutral
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Strong Year-to-Date Performance
The ETF has delivered solid returns so far this year, reflecting strong overall momentum.
Low Expense Ratio
With a very low expense ratio, this ETF minimizes costs, allowing investors to keep more of their returns.
Broad Sector Diversification
The ETF is spread across 11 sectors, reducing the risk of being overly dependent on any single industry.
Negative Factors
Limited Geographic Exposure
The ETF is heavily concentrated in U.S. companies, offering minimal exposure to international markets.
Small Weight in Top Holdings
Individual holdings have relatively small weights, which may dilute the impact of strong-performing stocks on overall returns.
Underperforming Holding
One of the top holdings, JB Hunt, has shown negative performance year-to-date, potentially dragging on the fund's overall results.
GSEW vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM1.49B
RegionNorth America
Expense Ratio0.09%
Beta0.85
IssuerGoldman Sachs
Inception DateSep 12, 2017
Dividend Yield1.53%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedSolactive US Large Cap Equal Weight Index (GTR)
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume70,538
30 Day Avg. Volume118,676
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
99.53Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering500
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
GSEW Summary
The Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSEW) is an investment fund that focuses on large U.S. companies across various industries, such as technology, healthcare, and finance. Unlike traditional funds that give more weight to bigger companies, GSEW uses an equal-weight strategy, meaning every company in the fund has the same influence on its performance. Some well-known companies in the fund include Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) and Micron Technology (MU). This ETF is a good option for investors seeking diversification and exposure to the U.S. economy’s growth potential. However, it’s important to know that the fund’s value can fluctuate with the overall stock market, so it carries the risk of market ups and downs.
How much will it cost me?The expense ratio for the Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSEW) is 0.09%, meaning you’ll pay $0.90 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is lower than average because the fund is passively managed, following an equal-weight index strategy that typically has lower costs compared to actively managed funds.
What would affect this ETF?The Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSEW) could benefit from positive trends in the U.S. economy, such as technological innovation and growth in sectors like technology and healthcare, which have significant weight in the fund. However, it may face challenges from rising interest rates, which could impact financial and real estate sectors, or economic slowdowns that affect consumer spending and cyclical industries. Its equal-weight strategy helps reduce concentration risk but may underperform during periods when a few large companies dominate market gains.
GSEW Top 10 Holdings
The Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSEW) showcases a balanced approach to large-cap U.S. equities, but recent performance has been a mixed bag. Eli Lilly is a standout, rising on strong revenue growth and pipeline advancements, while Regeneron and Biogen also contribute steady gains with robust earnings momentum. On the flip side, Corpay and Fair Isaac are dragging the fund, with bearish trends and valuation concerns weighing on their outlook. The ETF leans heavily into healthcare and technology, reflecting its focus on innovation-driven sectors, but remains diversified across industries to mitigate concentration risks.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Echostar | 0.28% | $4.20M | $30.91B | 360.02% | 57 Neutral | |
| ― | 0.28% | $4.19M | ― | ― | ― | |
| Rocket Lab USA | 0.28% | $4.12M | $32.85B | 151.80% | 51 Neutral | |
| AST SpaceMobile | 0.26% | $3.83M | $28.18B | 226.66% | 54 Neutral | |
| ― | 0.25% | $3.70M | ― | ― | ― | |
| Warner Bros | 0.24% | $3.58M | $74.30B | 148.38% | 68 Neutral | |
| Dollar General | 0.24% | $3.51M | $29.32B | 73.13% | 73 Outperform | |
| Southwest Airlines | 0.23% | $3.38M | $21.29B | 24.68% | 66 Neutral | |
| Dollar Tree | 0.23% | $3.38M | $25.83B | 85.29% | 61 Neutral | |
| Ciena | 0.23% | $3.34M | $30.81B | 143.47% | 70 Outperform |
GSEW Technical Analysis
Positive
―
Price Trends
84.57
Positive
84.07
Positive
80.61
Positive
Market Momentum
0.56
Negative
56.96
Neutral
67.81
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For GSEW, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 84.38, equal to the 50-day MA of 84.57, and equal to the 200-day MA of 80.61, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 0.56 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 56.96 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 67.81 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for GSEW.
GSEW Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
GSEW
Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF
85.83
6.89
8.73%
MGC
Vanguard Mega Cap ETF
―
―
―
PRF
Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1000 ETF
―
―
―
FTCS
First Trust Capital Strength ETF
―
―
―
QYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
―
―
―
JQUA
JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
Disclaimer
This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents