tiprankstipranks
Advertisement

GSEW - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

GSEW

Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSEW)

Rating:70Outperform
Price Target:
GSEW, the Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF, has an overall rating that suggests it is a generally solid fund with a mix of strengths and some notable risks. Strong contributors like Incyte and GE Healthcare support the rating through solid financial performance, positive earnings commentary, and reasonable or fair valuations that back their growth potential. However, holdings such as Carvana and Blackstone introduce risks related to high valuations, leverage, and overbought or cautious technical signals, while the fund’s exposure to several financially strong but sometimes expensive or technically weak names means investors should be aware of valuation and technical risk across multiple holdings.
Positive Factors
Broad Sector Diversification
The fund spreads its investments across many sectors, which can help reduce the impact if any one industry struggles.
Equal-Weight Approach
By giving similar weight to many large U.S. companies, the ETF avoids relying too heavily on a few mega-cap stocks for returns.
Low Expense Ratio
The fund’s relatively low annual fee means more of the investment returns stay in investors’ pockets over time.
Negative Factors
Heavy U.S. Concentration
With almost all assets in U.S. stocks, the ETF offers little geographic diversification and is highly tied to the U.S. market’s fortunes.
Tech and Growth Tilt
Significant exposure to technology and fast-growing companies can make the fund more sensitive to swings in growth and tech stocks.
Volatile Top Holdings
Several of the largest positions, including some with very strong and some with weak recent performance, may lead to bumpier short-term returns.

GSEW vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

GSEW Summary

GSEW is the Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF, which follows the Solactive US Large Cap Equal Weight Index. Instead of putting more money into the biggest companies, it spreads investments evenly across many large U.S. stocks in sectors like technology, finance, and health care. Well-known holdings include Intel and Marvell. Someone might invest in GSEW to get broad, diversified exposure to many leading U.S. companies, without being overly tied to just a few giants. A key risk is that the value of the ETF can go up and down with the overall U.S. stock market.
How much will it cost me?The expense ratio for the Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSEW) is 0.09%, meaning you’ll pay $0.90 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is lower than average because the fund is passively managed, following an equal-weight index strategy that typically has lower costs compared to actively managed funds.
What would affect this ETF?The Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSEW) could benefit from positive trends in the U.S. economy, such as technological innovation and growth in sectors like technology and healthcare, which have significant weight in the fund. However, it may face challenges from rising interest rates, which could impact financial and real estate sectors, or economic slowdowns that affect consumer spending and cyclical industries. Its equal-weight strategy helps reduce concentration risk but may underperform during periods when a few large companies dominate market gains.

GSEW Top 10 Holdings

GSEW’s story is less about one superstar and more about a deep U.S. bench, but a few names still stand out. On the upside, high-flying tech and cybersecurity plays like Datadog, Micron, CrowdStrike, and Palo Alto Networks are doing the heavy lifting, riding strong demand for cloud, AI, and digital security. Rocket Lab has also been rocketing higher, adding a speculative spark. On the flip side, MongoDB has been losing steam, and Devon Energy’s more mixed path shows that energy isn’t the main engine here. Overall, the fund leans into U.S. large-cap tech and industrial strength while staying broadly diversified across sectors.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
KLA0.24%$4.33M$31.50B193.36%
77
Outperform
DraftKings0.23%$4.16M$26.69B-20.55%
59
Neutral
Carpenter Technology0.23%$4.11M$27.95B125.75%
75
Outperform
Casey's General0.23%$4.10M$33.86B76.85%
68
Neutral
Humana0.23%$4.06M$44.27B61.19%
69
Neutral
Applied Materials0.23%$4.04M$438.77B232.52%
77
Outperform
Cardinal Health0.23%$4.04M$51.80B38.68%
66
Neutral
Blackstone Group0.22%$4.00M$147.66B-9.98%
72
Outperform
Ralph Lauren0.22%$4.00M$23.42B55.25%
78
Outperform
Robinhood0.22%$3.99M$83.13B28.36%
68
Neutral

GSEW Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Positive
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
90.67
Positive
100DMA
88.83
Positive
200DMA
86.66
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
0.90
Negative
RSI
64.56
Neutral
STOCH
85.35
Negative
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For GSEW, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 92.45, equal to the 50-day MA of 90.67, and equal to the 200-day MA of 86.66, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 0.90 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 64.56 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 85.35 is Negative, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for GSEW.

GSEW Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$1.78B0.09%
70
Outperform
$9.85B0.68%
74
Outperform
$9.74B0.05%
75
Outperform
$9.44B0.34%
72
Outperform
$9.04B0.39%
71
Outperform
$8.15B0.60%
76
Outperform
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
GSEW
Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF
94.63
16.43
21.01%
SPYI
NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF
MGC
Vanguard Mega Cap ETF
PRF
Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1000 ETF
RWL
Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF
QYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement