Education
About Us
Working with TipRanks
Follow Us
GQQQ - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
Astoria US Quality Growth Kings ETF (GQQQ)
Rating:75Outperform
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Exposure to Leading Growth Companies
The ETF holds many well-known large U.S. growth names, which can benefit if major technology and internet companies continue to do well over time.
Broad Sector Diversification Beyond Tech
While technology is the largest slice, the fund also invests in communication services, consumer, health care, financials, and other sectors, helping spread risk across different parts of the economy.
Growing Asset Base
The fund has built over $100 million in assets, suggesting it has attracted a meaningful level of investor interest and may have decent trading liquidity.
Negative Factors
Heavy Concentration in Technology
With a large portion of the portfolio in technology stocks, the ETF is especially sensitive to swings in the tech sector.
Top Holdings Recently Weak
Several of the biggest positions, including major technology names, have shown weak year-to-date performance, which has held back the fund’s overall results.
Higher Expense Ratio Than Many Broad ETFs
The fund’s fee is noticeably higher than that of many low-cost index ETFs, which can eat into long-term returns.
GQQQ vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM110.09M
RegionNorth America
Expense Ratio0.35%
Beta1.13
IssuerAstoria
Inception DateOct 01, 2024
Dividend YieldN/A
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedNo Underlying Index
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume8,936
30 Day Avg. Volume13,381
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
37.27Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusStrong Buy
Number of Analyst Covering102
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
GQQQ Summary
Astoria US Quality Growth Kings ETF (GQQQ) is a U.S. stock fund that focuses on “quality growth” companies rather than tracking a specific index. It mainly invests in large, well-known businesses with strong earnings and solid finances, especially in technology and communication services. Top holdings include Nvidia and Apple, along with other major tech and internet names. Someone might invest in GQQQ to seek long-term growth by owning many leading U.S. companies in one fund. A key risk is that it is heavily tilted toward growth and tech stocks, so its price can rise and fall sharply with that part of the market.
How much will it cost me?The Astoria US Quality Growth Kings ETF (GQQQ) has an expense ratio of 0.35%, which means you’ll pay $3.50 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is slightly higher than average because it is actively managed, focusing on selecting high-quality growth companies rather than tracking a broad index. The higher cost reflects the effort to identify and invest in companies with strong growth potential.
What would affect this ETF?The GQQQ ETF, with its strong focus on U.S. growth-oriented sectors like technology and communication services, could benefit from continued innovation and demand for digital solutions, as well as economic recovery boosting consumer spending. However, it may face challenges from rising interest rates, which can negatively impact growth stocks, and regulatory scrutiny on major tech companies, which are among its top holdings. Broader economic slowdowns or geopolitical tensions could also affect its performance.
GQQQ Top 10 Holdings
GQQQ is riding a powerful U.S. tech and AI wave, with Nvidia and Micron acting as the main engines thanks to their rising momentum in chips and data-center demand. Apple has perked up recently, but its earlier softness means it’s more of a steady anchor than a rocket. On the flip side, Microsoft and Amazon have been losing a bit of altitude, quietly tugging on returns, while Tesla’s choppy performance adds extra bumpiness. Overall, the fund is heavily tilted toward U.S. mega-cap tech and communication giants, with little exposure beyond America’s borders.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nvidia | 8.52% | $9.38M | $4.57T | 41.20% | 76 Outperform | |
| Apple | 7.47% | $8.22M | $3.88T | 7.75% | 79 Outperform | |
| Microsoft | 5.35% | $5.89M | $2.97T | -2.69% | 79 Outperform | |
| Alphabet Class A | 3.69% | $4.06M | $3.67T | 75.32% | 85 Outperform | |
| Amazon | 3.63% | $3.99M | $2.20T | -2.99% | 71 Outperform | |
| Broadcom | 3.49% | $3.84M | $1.58T | 52.13% | 76 Outperform | |
| Meta Platforms | 3.13% | $3.44M | $1.63T | -4.08% | 76 Outperform | |
| Alphabet Class C | 2.79% | $3.07M | $3.67T | 73.42% | 82 Outperform | |
| Tesla | 2.75% | $3.03M | $1.54T | 21.91% | 73 Outperform | |
| Micron | 2.24% | $2.46M | $473.78B | 333.20% | 79 Outperform |
GQQQ Technical Analysis
Positive
―
Price Trends
30.41
Positive
30.09
Positive
28.57
Positive
Market Momentum
>-0.01
Positive
52.73
Neutral
61.21
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For GQQQ, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 30.63, equal to the 50-day MA of 30.41, and equal to the 200-day MA of 28.57, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of >-0.01 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 52.73 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 61.21 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for GQQQ.
GQQQ Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
GQQQ
Astoria US Quality Growth Kings ETF
30.69
5.02
19.56%
LSGR
Natixis Loomis Sayles Focused Growth ETF
―
―
―
BASG
Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth ETF
―
―
―
GQGU
GQG US Equity ETF
―
―
―
FDG
American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF
―
―
―
GSGO
Goldman Sachs Growth Opportunities ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
Disclaimer
This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents