GPIQ - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
Goldman Sachs Nasdaq 100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ)
Rating:76Outperform
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Strong Recent Performance
The ETF has shown positive returns so far this year and over the last month, indicating solid recent momentum.
Leading Growth Companies in Top Holdings
Many of the largest positions, including major technology and consumer names, have delivered strong gains, helping support the fund’s results.
Broad Sector Diversification Within U.S. Stocks
Holdings spread across technology, communication services, consumer sectors, health care, and more help reduce the impact of weakness in any single industry.
Negative Factors
Heavy Concentration in a Few Mega-Cap Stocks
A small group of large technology and growth companies makes up a big share of the portfolio, increasing the fund’s sensitivity to those individual names.
Mixed Performance Among Top Holdings
Some major positions, including well-known technology stocks, have shown weak or negative performance this year, which can drag on overall returns.
Very High U.S. Market Exposure
The ETF is almost entirely invested in U.S. companies, offering little geographic diversification if the U.S. market faces a downturn.
GPIQ vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM4.27B
RegionNorth America
Expense Ratio0.29%
Beta1.11
IssuerGoldman Sachs
Inception DateOct 24, 2023
Dividend Yield9.43%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedNo Underlying Index
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume1,417,559
30 Day Avg. Volume1,125,206
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
65.40Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusStrong Buy
Number of Analyst Covering102
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
GPIQ Summary
The Goldman Sachs Nasdaq 100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ) invests mainly in large U.S. companies that are part of the Nasdaq 100 theme, with a strong focus on technology and other major growth sectors. It holds many well-known names such as Apple, Nvidia, Microsoft, Amazon, and Meta. This fund aims to give investors a mix of potential growth from leading companies and extra income through its premium income strategy, while offering broad diversification across industries. A key risk is that it is heavily tilted toward tech and growth stocks, so its price can rise and fall sharply with the Nasdaq market.
How much will it cost me?The Goldman Sachs Nasdaq 100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ) has an expense ratio of 0.29%, which means you’ll pay $2.90 per year for every $1,000 invested. This cost is slightly higher than average for ETFs because it uses an active management strategy to generate premium income and optimize returns. It’s a reasonable fee for the added expertise and strategy involved.
What would affect this ETF?The GPIQ ETF, heavily focused on large-cap technology and communication services companies like Nvidia, Apple, and Microsoft, could benefit from continued innovation and growth in these sectors, especially if consumer demand for tech products and services remains strong. However, rising interest rates or regulatory scrutiny on major tech firms could negatively impact the ETF's performance, as these factors often weigh on growth-oriented stocks. Additionally, broader economic conditions in the U.S., where the ETF is primarily focused, will play a significant role in its future trajectory.
GPIQ Top 10 Holdings
This ETF leans heavily on U.S. Big Tech, with Nvidia and Broadcom powering returns as AI-focused chip demand keeps them firmly in the “rising star” camp. Amazon and Alphabet are also pulling their weight, adding steady growth from cloud and digital ads. Apple looks more mixed, regaining some momentum recently but still feeling a bit tired year-to-date, while Microsoft’s earlier stumble has kept it from fully flexing its muscle. Tesla has been dragging the fund, and Walmart plays a steadier, defensive role amid all the tech fireworks.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nvidia | 8.93% | $376.69M | $5.48T | 66.41% | 76 Outperform | |
| Apple | 7.22% | $304.65M | $4.41T | 42.11% | 79 Outperform | |
| Amazon | 4.84% | $204.36M | $2.84T | 28.48% | 71 Outperform | |
| Microsoft | 4.67% | $197.20M | $3.13T | -7.12% | 79 Outperform | |
| Micron | 3.96% | $166.98M | $817.22B | 639.45% | 79 Outperform | |
| Alphabet Class A | 3.91% | $165.04M | $4.79T | 138.75% | 85 Outperform | |
| Tesla | 3.66% | $154.43M | $1.59T | 20.65% | 73 Outperform | |
| Alphabet Class C | 3.37% | $142.22M | $4.79T | 134.92% | 82 Outperform | |
| Advanced Micro Devices | 3.36% | $141.77M | $691.54B | 261.95% | 73 Outperform | |
| Broadcom | 3.29% | $138.78M | $2.01T | 85.99% | 76 Outperform |
GPIQ Technical Analysis
Positive
―
Price Trends
52.33
Positive
51.62
Positive
50.23
Positive
Market Momentum
1.63
Negative
72.34
Negative
88.79
Negative
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For GPIQ, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 55.62, equal to the 50-day MA of 52.33, and equal to the 200-day MA of 50.23, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 1.63 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 72.34 is Negative, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 88.79 is Negative, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for GPIQ.
GPIQ Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
GPIQ
Goldman Sachs Nasdaq 100 Core Premium Income ETF
57.55
14.46
33.56%
SPYI
NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF
―
―
―
FELC
Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Core ETF
―
―
―
TCAF
T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF
―
―
―
DIVO
Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF
―
―
―
GRNY
Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents