tiprankstipranks
Advertisement

GK - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

GK

AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF (GK)

Rating:71Outperform
Price Target:
GK’s rating reflects a generally strong, growth-focused portfolio led by large technology names like Alphabet, Microsoft, Apple, Nvidia, and Micron, all benefiting from solid financial performance and major exposure to AI and cloud trends. These leaders help support the fund’s quality, but several holdings, including Nvidia, Broadcom, Trane Technologies, and GE Vernova, face risks from high valuations, bearish or mixed technical signals, and cash flow or segment challenges. The main risk factor is the fund’s heavy concentration in tech and AI-related companies, which can increase volatility if sentiment toward these areas weakens.
Positive Factors
Strong Recent Performance
The fund has shown solid gains so far this year and over the past month, indicating positive recent momentum.
Leading Growth Companies in Top Holdings
Several of the largest positions, including major technology and industrial names, have delivered strong performance, helping drive the ETF’s returns.
Sector Diversification Across Growth Areas
Holdings spread across technology, industrials, communication services, and health care provide exposure to multiple growth-focused sectors rather than relying on just one industry.
Negative Factors
High Expense Ratio
The fund’s management fee is relatively high for an ETF, which can eat into long-term returns compared with lower-cost alternatives.
Concentration in a Few Large Positions
A small number of stocks make up a significant share of the portfolio, increasing the impact that any one company’s performance can have on the fund.
Mixed Performance Among Top Holdings
While several major positions have done well, some large holdings have shown weak or negative performance this year, which can drag on overall results.

GK vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

GK Summary

The AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF (GK) is an actively managed fund that invests in companies tied to big global themes like digital transformation, clean energy, and changing consumer habits. It doesn’t track a set index, but instead picks a mix of innovative businesses, mainly in the U.S., with a strong tilt toward technology and industrials. Well-known holdings include Alphabet (Google), Nvidia, and Microsoft. Someone might invest in GK for long-term growth and diversified exposure to forward-looking trends. However, it is heavily exposed to tech and growth stocks, so its price can swing up and down more than the overall market.
How much will it cost me?The AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF (Ticker: GK) has an expense ratio of 0.76%, meaning you’ll pay $7.60 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average because the fund is actively managed, which typically involves more research and trading compared to passively managed ETFs that track an index.
What would affect this ETF?The GK ETF, with its focus on innovative sectors like technology and sustainability, could benefit from continued advancements in AI, renewable energy, and digital transformation, as well as demographic shifts driving consumer trends. However, it may face challenges from rising interest rates, regulatory changes in tech and finance, or economic slowdowns that could impact high-growth companies. Its heavy exposure to U.S.-based firms also ties its performance closely to the health of the domestic economy.

GK Top 10 Holdings

GK is leaning heavily into U.S. tech and industrial innovators, with Micron, Nvidia, and Alphabet doing most of the heavy lifting as AI and cloud demand keep those names rising. Apple is also pulling its weight, adding a steady Big Tech backbone to the fund. On the industrial side, Quanta Services and GE Vernova are powering ahead, but Trane looks a bit winded and Netflix has been lagging, occasionally tripping up returns. Overall, this is a U.S.-centric bet on AI, digital platforms, and infrastructure upgrades rather than a broad global mix.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Micron10.01%$3.07M$846.93B704.33%
79
Outperform
Alphabet Class C9.25%$2.83M$4.62T123.70%
82
Outperform
Nvidia8.11%$2.48M$5.21T64.01%
76
Outperform
Broadcom6.81%$2.09M$1.96T81.07%
76
Outperform
Eli Lilly & Co6.14%$1.88M$1.00T49.22%
72
Outperform
GE Vernova Inc.5.43%$1.66M$279.13B123.68%
69
Neutral
Quanta Services4.50%$1.38M$108.56B115.72%
78
Outperform
Trane Technologies4.46%$1.36M$99.70B6.55%
70
Outperform
Apple4.24%$1.30M$4.54T58.15%
79
Outperform
Netflix3.89%$1.19M$373.08B-25.26%
73
Outperform

GK Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Positive
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
26.17
Positive
100DMA
25.91
Positive
200DMA
25.84
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
0.67
Positive
RSI
61.98
Neutral
STOCH
38.52
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For GK, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 28.11, equal to the 50-day MA of 26.17, and equal to the 200-day MA of 25.84, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 0.67 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 61.98 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 38.52 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for GK.

GK Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$30.62M0.77%
71
Outperform
$45.97M0.35%
68
Neutral
$38.27M0.65%
77
Outperform
$35.09M0.69%
68
Neutral
$26.46M0.57%
63
Neutral
$7.27M0.99%
69
Neutral
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
GK
AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF
28.59
6.59
29.95%
CCSO
Carbon Collective Climate Solutions U.S. Equity ETF
XPND
First Trust Expanded Technology ETF
LRNZ
TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF
JXX
Janus Henderson Transformational Growth ETF
VICE
AdvisorShares Vice ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement