tiprankstipranks
Advertisement

GINN - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

GINN

Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN)

Rating:69Neutral
Price Target:
GINN, the Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF, earns a solid overall rating thanks to its focus on major innovative leaders like Alphabet, Microsoft, Apple, Nvidia, and Amazon, which all benefit from strong financial performance and growth in areas such as cloud computing, AI, and services. This strength is partly offset by holdings like Intel and Eli Lilly, where valuation and profitability or cash flow challenges introduce some drag, and the fund’s heavy tilt toward large tech and AI-driven companies means investors face sector concentration risk if sentiment toward technology weakens.
Positive Factors
Solid Recent Performance
The ETF has shown strong year-to-date and multi-month gains, indicating positive momentum in its current strategy.
Global and Sector Diversification
Holdings spread across many countries and a wide mix of sectors help reduce the impact of problems in any single region or industry.
Strong Innovative Leaders in Top Holdings
Several major positions in well-known technology and healthcare innovators have delivered strong gains, supporting the fund’s overall performance.
Negative Factors
Moderate Expense Ratio
The fund’s fees are not extremely high but are above the cheapest index ETFs, which slightly reduces the net return to investors.
Heavy U.S. Concentration
A large majority of assets are invested in U.S. companies, which limits diversification benefits from other global markets.
Exposure to Volatile Growth Stocks
Several top holdings in technology and consumer names can be very sensitive to market swings, increasing the fund’s overall risk during downturns.

GINN vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

GINN Summary

GINN is the Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF, which follows the Solactive Innovative Global Equity Index and focuses on companies driving new technologies and ideas around the world. It mainly holds U.S. stocks in areas like technology and healthcare, with big names such as Apple and Nvidia among its top holdings. Investors might consider GINN if they want long-term growth by investing in innovative businesses across many sectors and countries, rather than picking individual stocks. A key risk is that these innovation-focused companies can be more volatile, so the ETF’s price can rise and fall sharply with changes in the stock market and tech-related news.
How much will it cost me?The Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN) has an expense ratio of 0.50%, which means you’ll pay $5 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is slightly higher than average for ETFs because it is actively managed to focus on innovative companies across multiple sectors. The higher cost reflects the specialized strategy and research involved in selecting these forward-thinking investments.
What would affect this ETF?The Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN) could benefit from continued advancements in technology, healthcare, and renewable energy, as these sectors are key drivers of global innovation and are heavily represented in its portfolio. However, the ETF may face challenges from rising interest rates, which can negatively impact growth-oriented companies, and regulatory changes in major markets like the U.S. and China, where many of its top holdings operate. Global economic conditions and geopolitical tensions could also influence the performance of this ETF, given its broad geographic exposure.

GINN Top 10 Holdings

GINN leans heavily into global innovation, with Big Tech doing much of the heavy lifting. Apple is rising and helping anchor returns, while Nvidia’s gains have cooled recently but its AI story still keeps it in the spotlight. Microsoft and Amazon look a bit tired, with more mixed or lagging moves that can occasionally tap the brakes on performance. Alphabet is steady but not shooting the lights out, and Tencent’s slump has been a noticeable drag from the China side. Overall, it’s a tech-tilted, globally diversified ride on innovation themes.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Microsoft2.27%$4.86M$3.71T-3.01%
79
Outperform
Apple2.05%$4.38M$4.57T35.69%
79
Outperform
Nvidia2.04%$4.37M$5.42T19.49%
76
Outperform
Amazon1.93%$4.13M$2.96T25.66%
71
Outperform
Alphabet Class A1.73%$3.69M$4.33T77.87%
85
Outperform
Meta Platforms1.49%$3.18M$1.51T-22.32%
76
Outperform
Tencent Holdings 1.19%$2.54MHK$4.31T-13.53%
75
Outperform
Intel1.16%$2.48M$512.72B372.25%
64
Neutral
Eli Lilly & Co1.10%$2.36M$1.12T93.94%
72
Outperform
Johnson & Johnson0.87%$1.86M$624.74B50.62%
78
Outperform

GINN Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Positive
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
78.81
Positive
100DMA
76.60
Positive
200DMA
74.89
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
1.17
Negative
RSI
66.43
Neutral
STOCH
94.40
Negative
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For GINN, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 79.76, equal to the 50-day MA of 78.81, and equal to the 200-day MA of 74.89, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 1.17 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 66.43 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 94.40 is Negative, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for GINN.

GINN Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$215.83M0.50%
69
Neutral
$311.02M0.75%
68
Neutral
$255.24M0.82%
69
Neutral
$227.48M0.75%
67
Neutral
$188.77M0.40%
67
Neutral
$188.77M0.75%
71
Outperform
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
GINN
Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF
82.50
13.14
18.94%
ILDR
First Trust Innovation Leaders ETF
TMAT
Main Thematic Innovation ETF
SPRX
Spear Alpha ETF
NBDS
Neuberger Berman Disrupters ETF
YNOT
Horizon Digital Frontier ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement