tiprankstipranks
Trending News
More News >
Advertisement

TMAT - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

TMAT

Main Thematic Innovation ETF (TMAT)

Rating:64Neutral
Price Target:
TMAT, the Main Thematic Innovation ETF, earns a solid rating mainly because several of its largest positions—like Nvidia, Micron, Broadcom, Oracle, and CrowdStrike—show strong financial performance and are well positioned in fast-growing areas such as AI, semiconductors, and cloud software. However, weaker holdings like Nebius Group, Rubrik, AeroVironment, and Snowflake face profitability, cash flow, or valuation challenges that drag on the fund’s overall appeal, and the ETF’s focus on innovative tech and AI-related names means investors are exposed to sector-specific and high-valuation risk.
Positive Factors
Innovation-Focused Tech Exposure
More than half of the fund is invested in technology and related innovative companies, giving investors targeted exposure to growth-oriented themes.
Multiple Growth Drivers in Top Holdings
Several of the largest positions, such as Micron, Nebius Group, and Coherent, have shown strong recent performance, helping support the fund’s return potential.
Meaningful Size for a Thematic Fund
With over $200 million in assets, the ETF is large enough to offer reasonable trading liquidity for most everyday investors.
Negative Factors
High Expense Ratio
The fund’s relatively high fee means more of the investment return goes to costs instead of staying in investors’ pockets.
Recent Weak Performance
The ETF has shown weak returns over the past one and three months, indicating recent pressure on its strategy and holdings.
Heavy U.S. and Tech Concentration
The portfolio is heavily concentrated in U.S. technology stocks, which increases sensitivity to downturns in that sector and region.

TMAT vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

TMAT Summary

TMAT (Main Thematic Innovation ETF) is an actively managed fund that invests in companies tied to big future themes rather than tracking a traditional index. It focuses on areas like artificial intelligence, robotics, renewable energy, and biotechnology, with a heavy tilt toward U.S. technology and health care stocks. Well-known holdings include Nvidia and Oracle. Someone might invest in TMAT to seek long-term growth from innovative companies and to get broad exposure to several cutting-edge trends in one fund. A key risk is that it is heavily focused on fast-changing tech-related sectors, so its price can be very volatile and may drop sharply at times.
How much will it cost me?The Main Thematic Innovation ETF (TMAT) has an expense ratio of 0.85%, which means you’ll pay $8.50 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average because TMAT is actively managed, focusing on identifying and investing in innovative and transformative companies across various sectors. Active management typically involves higher costs due to the research and expertise required.
What would affect this ETF?The TMAT ETF, with its focus on innovative sectors like technology, healthcare, and renewable energy, could benefit from continued advancements in artificial intelligence, robotics, and biotechnology, as well as increased global demand for sustainable solutions. However, it may face challenges from rising interest rates, which can impact growth-focused companies, and potential regulatory changes in technology and healthcare industries that could affect its top holdings like Nvidia and Oracle. Global economic uncertainty could also influence the performance of the ETF’s diverse portfolio.

TMAT Top 10 Holdings

TMAT is leaning hard into innovation, with a tech-heavy lineup led by chip names like Micron and Coherent, which have been rising and helping to pull the fund forward. Nvidia, while a long-term AI powerhouse, has been more mixed lately, acting more like a steady anchor than a speedboat. On the other side, software and cloud players such as Cloudflare, Rubrik, and Snowflake have been lagging, putting a drag on returns. Overall, it’s a globally focused, innovation-first portfolio with meaningful concentration in semiconductors and cloud infrastructure.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Micron2.50%$4.90M$489.91B371.12%
79
Outperform
Fair Isaac2.41%$4.73M$36.26B-19.54%
69
Neutral
Clear Secure2.13%$4.18M$4.46B40.26%
77
Outperform
Sportradar Group AG1.92%$3.77M$5.78B-13.36%
67
Neutral
Autodesk1.85%$3.63M$56.89B-17.51%
74
Outperform
Insulet1.84%$3.61M$18.16B-8.90%
70
Outperform
Mercadolibre1.78%$3.49M$115.01B13.91%
77
Outperform
Uber Technologies1.77%$3.48M$165.77B22.69%
74
Outperform
CrowdStrike Holdings1.62%$3.18M$118.28B12.03%
67
Neutral
Aaon1.61%$3.16M$7.45B-19.97%
62
Neutral

TMAT Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Negative
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
25.48
Negative
100DMA
26.45
Negative
200DMA
24.38
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
-0.18
Positive
RSI
39.65
Neutral
STOCH
31.53
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For TMAT, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 25.51, equal to the 50-day MA of 25.48, and equal to the 200-day MA of 24.38, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of -0.18 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 39.65 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 31.53 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for TMAT.

TMAT Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$199.14M0.85%
$534.83M0.55%
$384.92M0.39%
$230.11M0.75%
$158.97M0.75%
$129.30M0.85%
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
TMAT
Main Thematic Innovation ETF
24.86
3.12
14.35%
BKGI
BNY Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF
CCNR
CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF
ILDR
First Trust Innovation Leaders ETF
SPRX
Spear Alpha ETF
TPZ
Tortoise Essential Energy Fund
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Disclaimer

This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement