Education
About Us
Working with TipRanks
Follow Us
GFLW - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF (GFLW)
Rating:73Outperform
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Strong Top Holdings
Several top positions, including Nvidia, Broadcom, and Palantir, have shown strong year-to-date performance, driving the fund’s returns.
Sector Diversification
The ETF spreads its investments across six sectors, with significant exposure to Technology, Consumer Cyclical, and Industrials, reducing reliance on a single industry.
Reasonable Expense Ratio
The fund’s expense ratio of 0.39% is competitive, allowing investors to keep more of their returns compared to higher-cost ETFs.
Negative Factors
High Technology Concentration
With over 44% of the portfolio in Technology, the fund is heavily exposed to potential volatility in this sector.
Limited Geographic Exposure
The ETF is almost entirely focused on U.S. companies, offering little diversification across global markets.
Mixed Short-Term Performance
The fund’s one-month performance has been slightly negative, which may concern investors looking for consistent short-term gains.
GFLW vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM644.45M
RegionNorth America
Expense Ratio0.39%
Beta1.26
IssuerVictoryShares
Inception DateDec 03, 2024
Dividend YieldN/A
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedVictory Free Cash Flow Growth Index
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume54,011
30 Day Avg. Volume112,436
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
33.94Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering100
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
GFLW Summary
The VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF (Ticker: GFLW) is an investment fund that focuses on large companies in the U.S. with strong free cash flow growth, which is a sign of financial health and efficiency. It includes well-known companies like Alphabet (Google) and Nvidia, and it primarily invests in industries such as technology, consumer goods, and healthcare. This ETF could be a good choice for investors looking for growth opportunities and exposure to market-leading firms. However, since it is heavily invested in technology stocks, its performance can be affected by changes in the tech industry or broader market trends.
How much will it cost me?The VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF (Ticker: GFLW) has an expense ratio of 0.39%, meaning you’ll pay $3.90 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is slightly higher than the average for passively managed ETFs because it focuses on a specialized strategy targeting companies with strong free cash flow growth.
What would affect this ETF?The VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF (GFLW), with its focus on U.S. large-cap companies and strong exposure to technology and consumer cyclical sectors, could benefit from continued innovation and growth in these industries, as well as favorable economic conditions like lower interest rates that support business expansion. However, it may face challenges from regulatory changes in the tech sector, economic slowdowns affecting consumer spending, or rising interest rates that could pressure growth-oriented companies. Monitoring sector trends and broader economic policies will be key for investors in this ETF.
GFLW Top 10 Holdings
The VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF leans heavily on technology, with nearly half of its portfolio tied to sector giants like Nvidia and Broadcom. While Nvidia’s recent performance has been mixed, Broadcom’s steady growth in AI semiconductors has helped buoy the fund. Lam Research and KLA are rising stars, benefiting from bullish momentum in advanced tech. On the flip side, Uber’s lagging performance has been a drag, as profitability challenges weigh on its outlook. With a strong U.S. focus and a tech-heavy tilt, this ETF is riding the wave of innovation but faces risks from underperformers like Uber.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nvidia | 3.14% | $20.38M | $4.46T | 34.94% | 76 Outperform | |
| Broadcom | 3.08% | $19.98M | $1.62T | 42.46% | 76 Outperform | |
| Uber Technologies | 2.89% | $18.78M | $168.84B | 31.68% | 74 Outperform | |
| Lam Research | 2.88% | $18.73M | $220.13B | 137.25% | 77 Outperform | |
| Royalty Pharma | 2.73% | $17.72M | $22.43B | 53.90% | 79 Outperform | |
| Cardinal Health | 2.68% | $17.38M | $48.75B | 74.51% | 66 Neutral | |
| GE Vernova Inc. | 2.61% | $16.94M | $179.56B | 90.56% | 69 Neutral | |
| KLA | 2.58% | $16.77M | $166.30B | 95.03% | 77 Outperform | |
| McKesson | 2.54% | $16.52M | $101.01B | 42.58% | 62 Neutral | |
| Amphenol | 2.52% | $16.38M | $165.42B | 91.35% | 78 Outperform |
GFLW Technical Analysis
Positive
―
Price Trends
28.38
Positive
28.12
Positive
26.13
Positive
Market Momentum
0.04
Negative
54.26
Neutral
68.38
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For GFLW, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 28.41, equal to the 50-day MA of 28.38, and equal to the 200-day MA of 26.13, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 0.04 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 54.26 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 68.38 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for GFLW.
GFLW Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
GFLW
VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF
28.64
4.02
16.33%
TGRT
T. Rowe Price Growth ETF
―
―
―
IWLG
IQ Winslow Large Cap Growth ETF
―
―
―
SFY
Sofi Select 500 Etf
―
―
―
QDVO
Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF
―
―
―
LRGE
ClearBridge Large Cap Growth ESG ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
Disclaimer
This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents