GFLW - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF (GFLW)
Rating:72Outperform
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Strong Recent Year-to-Date Results
The ETF has delivered strong gains so far this year, suggesting its strategy has been working well in the current market.
Leading Growth Companies in Top Holdings
Several of the largest positions, including well-known technology and industrial names, have shown strong performance, helping drive the fund’s returns.
Broad Sector Diversification
Holdings spread across technology, industrials, health care, consumer sectors, and more help reduce the impact if any one industry runs into trouble.
Negative Factors
Heavy Tilt Toward Technology
A large share of the portfolio is in technology stocks, which can make the fund more sensitive to swings in that sector.
Short-Term Pullback
The ETF has recently experienced a weak one-month stretch, which may signal near-term volatility even though longer-term performance has been stronger.
Higher Expense Ratio Than Some Core ETFs
The fund’s ongoing fee is not especially low, which means investors give up more of their returns to costs compared with many broad-market index ETFs.
GFLW vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM885.40M
RegionNorth America
Expense Ratio0.39%
Beta1.26
IssuerVictoryShares
Inception DateDec 03, 2024
Dividend YieldN/A
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedVictory Free Cash Flow Growth Index
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume120,647
30 Day Avg. Volume104,618
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
40.60Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusStrong Buy
Number of Analyst Covering100
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
GFLW Summary
VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF (GFLW) is a U.S. stock fund that follows the Victory Free Cash Flow Growth Index. It focuses on large companies that are growing their cash flow, which can be a sign of strong, healthy businesses. The fund is heavy in technology and industrial stocks and holds well-known names like Nvidia and Caterpillar. Someone might invest in GFLW to seek long-term growth from leading companies across many sectors in one simple investment. A key risk is that it leans toward growth and tech-related stocks, so its price can rise and fall more than the overall market.
How much will it cost me?The VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF (Ticker: GFLW) has an expense ratio of 0.39%, meaning you’ll pay $3.90 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is slightly higher than the average for passively managed ETFs because it focuses on a specialized strategy targeting companies with strong free cash flow growth.
What would affect this ETF?The VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF (GFLW), with its focus on U.S. large-cap companies and strong exposure to technology and consumer cyclical sectors, could benefit from continued innovation and growth in these industries, as well as favorable economic conditions like lower interest rates that support business expansion. However, it may face challenges from regulatory changes in the tech sector, economic slowdowns affecting consumer spending, or rising interest rates that could pressure growth-oriented companies. Monitoring sector trends and broader economic policies will be key for investors in this ETF.
GFLW Top 10 Holdings
GFLW is leaning hard into U.S. cash-generating growth stories, with a clear tech and semiconductor tilt. Dell has been the standout engine, rising steadily on AI momentum, while Nvidia and Broadcom add more AI firepower, though their recent moves have been a bit mixed. Applied Materials and Lam Research, key chip-equipment names, have lost some short-term steam but still support the fund’s longer-term theme. Outside tech, Caterpillar and GE Vernova provide industrial muscle, though their choppier performance has occasionally acted as a brake on overall returns.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nvidia | 3.68% | $32.61M | $5.01T | 11.18% | 76 Outperform | |
| Caterpillar | 3.35% | $29.67M | $409.38B | 101.71% | 76 Outperform | |
| Dell Technologies | 2.98% | $26.35M | $283.62B | 218.92% | 65 Neutral | |
| SanDisk Corp | 2.59% | $22.92M | $212.74B | 2951.40% | 55 Neutral | |
| Eli Lilly & Co | 2.43% | $21.50M | $1.13T | 48.19% | 72 Outperform | |
| Broadcom | 2.42% | $21.41M | $1.82T | 30.21% | 76 Outperform | |
| Applied Materials | 2.41% | $21.36M | $425.76B | 171.66% | 77 Outperform | |
| Lam Research | 2.25% | $19.95M | $381.69B | 195.69% | 77 Outperform | |
| GE Vernova Inc. | 2.20% | $19.48M | $270.26B | 53.87% | 69 Neutral | |
| Royalty Pharma | 2.11% | $18.70M | $33.88B | 58.47% | 79 Outperform |
GFLW Technical Analysis
Negative
―
Price Trends
32.33
Negative
30.30
Positive
29.27
Positive
Market Momentum
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For GFLW, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 32.74, equal to the 50-day MA of 32.33, and equal to the 200-day MA of 29.27, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of ― indicates undefined momentum. The RSI at ― is undefined, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of ― is undefined, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for GFLW.
GFLW Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
GFLW
VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF
31.70
4.74
17.58%
CNEQ
Alger Concentrated Equity ETF
―
―
―
QDVO
Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF
―
―
―
SFY
Sofi Select 500 Etf
―
―
―
FLCG
Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth ETF
―
―
―
GGUS
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Growth Equity ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents