tiprankstipranks
Advertisement

GENZ - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

GENZ

Vaneck Digital Native Economy Etf (GENZ)

Rating:71Outperform
Price Target:
GENZ, the Vaneck Digital Native Economy ETF, has a solid overall rating that reflects a mix of strong digital-focused leaders and a few more challenging holdings. High-quality names like NetEase, Shopify, and DoorDash support the fund with robust financial performance, growth initiatives, and generally positive outlooks, while weaker positions such as Roblox and Take-Two, which face profitability, leverage, and valuation concerns, weigh on the rating. The main risk for investors is that many holdings operate in high-growth, tech-driven businesses where valuations can be elevated and technical signals sometimes point to caution, making the fund sensitive to shifts in market sentiment toward digital and growth stocks.
Positive Factors
Focused Exposure to the Digital Economy
The ETF targets companies tied to online platforms, digital services, and new-economy business models, which could benefit if digital adoption continues to grow over time.
Sector Diversification Within Growth Areas
Holdings spread across financials, communication services, technology, and consumer cyclical sectors help avoid relying on just one industry within the digital theme.
Recent Short-Term Rebound
The fund has shown a strong gain over the past month, suggesting some recovery momentum after earlier weakness this year.
Negative Factors
Weak Year-to-Date Performance
The ETF’s overall return so far this year has been negative, reflecting broad weakness in its digital-focused holdings.
Top Holdings Mostly Lagging
Most of the largest positions, including well-known names like Shopify, Uber, and Roblox, have delivered weak performance this year, which has weighed on the fund.
High Fee for a Thematic ETF
The expense ratio is relatively high compared with many broad-market ETFs, meaning more of the fund’s returns are eaten up by costs.

GENZ vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

GENZ Summary

GENZ is the VanEck Digital Native Economy ETF, which follows the MarketVector Digital Native Economy Index. It focuses on companies that power the online and app-based world, including e-commerce, ride-sharing, online gaming, and digital finance. Well-known holdings include Shopify and Uber, along with other digital platforms like Airbnb and Roblox. Someone might invest in this ETF to tap into the long-term growth of the digital economy while spreading their money across many companies instead of picking single stocks. A key risk is that these tech-focused and online businesses can be very volatile and may rise or fall sharply with market sentiment.
How much will it cost me?The VanEck Gaming ETF (Ticker: BJK) has an expense ratio of 0.67%, meaning you’ll pay $6.70 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average because it is actively managed to focus on a specialized niche within the gaming and leisure industry.
What would affect this ETF?The VanEck Gaming ETF could benefit from growing consumer demand for entertainment and leisure activities, particularly in casinos, online gaming, and sports betting, as well as advancements in gaming technology. However, it may face challenges from regulatory changes in key markets, economic downturns that reduce discretionary spending, or rising interest rates that could impact companies in the consumer cyclical and real estate sectors. Its global exposure and focus on industry leaders like Aristocrat Leisure and Flutter Entertainment provide opportunities for growth but also make it sensitive to international economic and political conditions.

GENZ Top 10 Holdings

This ETF is tightly tied to the digital consumer and gaming economy, with big weights in names like Shopify, Uber, and Roblox. Recently, Shopify and DoorDash have been rising again, helping to offset weakness in heavier laggards like Roblox and Take-Two, which have stumbled on profitability worries. Airbnb and Electronic Arts are more steady hands, keeping volatility in check. While the fund is officially U.S.-focused, it sprinkles in global players like NetEase, and overall it leans hard into tech-enabled platforms rather than old-school consumer stocks.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Uber Technologies8.30%$1.39M$152.85B-18.80%
74
Outperform
NetEase8.15%$1.37M$71.36B-4.61%
81
Outperform
Charles Schwab7.89%$1.33M$158.05B3.54%
74
Outperform
Electronic Arts7.43%$1.25M$50.31B33.60%
70
Outperform
Shopify6.41%$1.08M$130.18B-6.15%
77
Outperform
Take-Two5.35%$899.69K$44.89B3.20%
53
Neutral
Roblox4.80%$807.59K$30.68B-42.15%
51
Neutral
Airbnb4.64%$780.10K$80.07B-1.68%
71
Outperform
CME Group4.59%$771.66K$108.29B9.78%
74
Outperform
DoorDash4.38%$735.82K$69.37B-19.54%
76
Outperform

GENZ Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Negative
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
35.65
Negative
100DMA
36.96
Negative
200DMA
39.48
Negative
Market Momentum
MACD
-0.22
Positive
RSI
42.52
Neutral
STOCH
38.49
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For GENZ, the sentiment is Negative. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 35.90, equal to the 50-day MA of 35.65, and equal to the 200-day MA of 39.48, indicating a bearish trend. The MACD of -0.22 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 42.52 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 38.49 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Negative sentiment for GENZ.

GENZ Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$17.02M0.51%
71
Outperform
$94.29M0.50%
71
Outperform
$47.78M0.35%
68
Neutral
$39.19M0.65%
77
Outperform
$35.54M0.65%
70
Outperform
$7.30M0.99%
69
Neutral
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
GENZ
Vaneck Digital Native Economy Etf
35.20
-2.63
-6.95%
MILN
Global X Millennial Consumer ETF
CCSO
Carbon Collective Climate Solutions U.S. Equity ETF
XPND
First Trust Expanded Technology ETF
RBLD
First Trust Alerian US NextGen Infrastructure ETF
VICE
AdvisorShares Vice ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement