GENZ - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
Vaneck Digital Native Economy Etf (GENZ)
Rating:70Outperform
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Targeted Gaming Exposure
The ETF gives focused access to the global gaming and casino industry, which can benefit if the sector recovers or grows over time.
Global Diversification
Holdings spread across the U.S., Europe, Asia, and Australia reduce reliance on any single country’s gaming market.
Meaningful Real Estate Component
A sizable allocation to gaming-related real estate companies adds some income-oriented and asset-backed exposure within the portfolio.
Negative Factors
Recent Weak Performance
The ETF has shown weak returns over the past month, quarter, and year-to-date, signaling recent headwinds for the gaming sector.
High Sector Concentration
With most assets in consumer cyclical gaming companies, the fund is highly sensitive to economic slowdowns and changes in discretionary spending.
Elevated Expense Ratio
The fund’s relatively high fee means more of the returns are eaten up by costs compared with many broad-market ETFs.
GENZ vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM18.80M
RegionNorth America
Expense Ratio0.51%
Beta0.85
IssuerVanEck
Inception DateJan 22, 2008
Dividend Yield3.62%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedMarketVector Digital Native Economy Index - Benchmark TR Gross
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume2,956
30 Day Avg. Volume3,031
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
48.34Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering33
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
GENZ Summary
The VanEck Gaming ETF (BJK) tracks the MVIS Global Gaming Index and focuses on casinos, online gaming, and sports betting companies around the world. It holds well-known names like DraftKings, Las Vegas Sands, and Wynn Resorts, along with other casino operators and gaming technology firms. Someone might invest in BJK to bet on the long-term growth of the global gaming and entertainment industry and to get instant diversification across many gaming companies instead of picking single stocks. A key risk is that it is heavily tied to the gaming sector, so its price can swing a lot with changes in consumer spending, regulations, or gambling trends.
How much will it cost me?The VanEck Gaming ETF (Ticker: BJK) has an expense ratio of 0.67%, meaning you’ll pay $6.70 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average because it is actively managed to focus on a specialized niche within the gaming and leisure industry.
What would affect this ETF?The VanEck Gaming ETF could benefit from growing consumer demand for entertainment and leisure activities, particularly in casinos, online gaming, and sports betting, as well as advancements in gaming technology. However, it may face challenges from regulatory changes in key markets, economic downturns that reduce discretionary spending, or rising interest rates that could impact companies in the consumer cyclical and real estate sectors. Its global exposure and focus on industry leaders like Aristocrat Leisure and Flutter Entertainment provide opportunities for growth but also make it sensitive to international economic and political conditions.
GENZ Top 10 Holdings
BJK is a pure play on global casinos and gaming, and lately the house has been winning more than the fund. U.S. gaming landlords like VICI and Gaming and Leisure are acting as the steadier anchors, while Australia’s Lottery Corporation adds a modest bright spot. But big casino names such as Las Vegas Sands, Wynn, and Hong Kong–listed Galaxy Entertainment have been losing steam, and online betting leaders DraftKings and Flutter have been dragging the fund. With most exposure in consumer cyclical gaming names worldwide, performance is tied tightly to discretionary spending and regulatory headlines.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NetEase | 8.01% | $1.51M | $69.67B | 19.72% | 81 Outperform | |
| Uber Technologies | 7.96% | $1.50M | $157.41B | 2.50% | 74 Outperform | |
| Shopify | 7.65% | $1.44M | $166.45B | 56.78% | 77 Outperform | |
| Charles Schwab | 7.58% | $1.42M | $174.28B | 21.18% | 74 Outperform | |
| Electronic Arts | 7.09% | $1.33M | $50.86B | 39.98% | 70 Outperform | |
| Roblox | 6.38% | $1.20M | $42.37B | 1.06% | 51 Neutral | |
| DoorDash | 4.64% | $872.44K | $78.17B | 1.46% | 76 Outperform | |
| Airbnb | 4.53% | $851.80K | $83.70B | 25.60% | 71 Outperform | |
| Take-Two | 4.45% | $835.61K | $39.66B | -0.34% | 53 Neutral | |
| CME Group | 4.29% | $805.13K | $107.72B | 9.57% | 74 Outperform |
GENZ Technical Analysis
Positive
―
Price Trends
35.94
Positive
37.94
Negative
40.28
Negative
Market Momentum
0.34
Negative
63.51
Neutral
90.63
Negative
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For GENZ, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 35.30, equal to the 50-day MA of 35.94, and equal to the 200-day MA of 40.28, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of 0.34 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 63.51 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 90.63 is Negative, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for GENZ.
GENZ Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
GENZ
Vaneck Digital Native Economy Etf
37.80
2.65
7.54%
CEPI
REX Crypto Equity Premium Income ETF
―
―
―
GPTY
YieldMax AI & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF
―
―
―
CCSO
Carbon Collective Climate Solutions U.S. Equity ETF
―
―
―
XPND
First Trust Expanded Technology ETF
―
―
―
VICE
AdvisorShares Vice ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents