tiprankstipranks
Advertisement

GARY - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

GARY

Mango Growth ETF (GARY)

Rating:66Neutral
Price Target:
GARY (Mango Growth ETF) earns a solid overall rating largely because it holds high-quality chip and AI leaders like ASML, TSMC, Lam Research, and Microsoft, all showing strong financial performance, positive earnings commentary, and good long-term growth prospects in advanced technologies. However, several major holdings such as Nvidia, AMD, Palantir, and ServiceNow face risks from high valuations and some bearish or mixed technical signals, which weigh on the fund’s rating. The main risk factor is the ETF’s heavy concentration in semiconductor and AI-related names, which can make performance more sensitive to shifts in tech demand, regulation, and sentiment around expensive growth stocks.
Positive Factors
Leading Chip and Tech Equipment Holdings
Several major semiconductor and chip-equipment stocks in the top holdings have shown strong performance, helping support the ETF’s overall returns.
Focused Growth Exposure
The heavy tilt toward technology and related growth sectors gives investors targeted exposure to companies that can benefit from long-term innovation trends.
Healthy Fund Size
With a sizable level of assets under management, the ETF appears established enough to offer reasonable trading liquidity for everyday investors.
Negative Factors
High Technology Concentration
More than half of the fund is invested in the technology sector, which increases the risk if that part of the market falls out of favor.
Several Weak Top Holdings
A number of the largest positions have shown weak recent performance, which has weighed on the ETF’s short-term results.
Relatively High Expense Ratio
The fund’s expense ratio is on the higher side for an ETF, meaning more of the returns are eaten up by fees over time.

GARY vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

GARY Summary

Mango Growth ETF (ticker: GARY) is an actively managed fund that focuses on large U.S. companies with strong growth potential, especially in technology. It does not track a set index, but instead picks stocks the managers believe can grow faster than the overall market. Many of its holdings are big, well-known tech names such as Nvidia and Microsoft, along with other growth-focused companies. Someone might invest in this ETF to seek long-term growth by owning a basket of leading growth stocks. A key risk is that it is heavily tilted toward technology, so its price can swing a lot and may fall sharply if tech stocks drop.
How much will it cost me?The Mango Growth ETF (Ticker: GARY) has an expense ratio of 0.77%, which means you’ll pay $7.70 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than the average expense ratio for ETFs because it is actively managed, requiring more research and oversight compared to passively managed funds that track an index.
What would affect this ETF?The Mango Growth ETF's strong focus on technology and communication services positions it to benefit from continued innovation and demand in these sectors, especially as advancements in AI, semiconductors, and digital infrastructure drive growth. However, the fund could face challenges from rising interest rates, which often impact growth stocks negatively, and potential regulatory changes in the tech industry that could affect its top holdings like Nvidia and AMD. Broader economic conditions, such as a slowdown in consumer spending or healthcare policy shifts, may also influence the ETF's performance.

GARY Top 10 Holdings

Mango Growth ETF is leaning hard into the AI and chip boom, with Lam Research, Applied Materials, AMD, and KLA doing much of the heavy lifting as their shares keep climbing on strong demand for advanced semiconductors. ASML and TSMC add to this tech-heavy backbone, giving the fund a clear tilt toward the global chip supply chain, even though the ETF is U.S.-focused overall. On the softer side, Nvidia looks a bit winded after a huge run, while Microsoft, Palantir, and ServiceNow have been lagging and quietly tugging on performance.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Advanced Micro Devices6.75%$17.21M$567.05B247.16%
73
Outperform
Nvidia5.38%$13.71M$5.06T99.22%
76
Outperform
ASML Holding4.78%$12.18M$559.08B112.92%
81
Outperform
Applied Materials4.78%$12.18M$330.97B168.49%
77
Outperform
KLA4.31%$11.00M$253.63B173.88%
77
Outperform
Lam Research4.06%$10.34M$334.88B262.54%
77
Outperform
Microsoft3.93%$10.02M$3.15T8.60%
79
Outperform
TSMC3.60%$9.18M$1.80T147.84%
81
Outperform
Palantir Technologies3.46%$8.82M$342.22B24.81%
74
Outperform
ServiceNow2.88%$7.35M$92.99B-51.76%
75
Outperform

GARY Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Positive
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
22.31
Positive
100DMA
200DMA
Market Momentum
MACD
0.47
Negative
RSI
63.99
Neutral
STOCH
47.25
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For GARY, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 23.00, equal to the 50-day MA of 22.31, and equal to the 200-day MA of ―, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of 0.47 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 63.99 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 47.25 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for GARY.

GARY Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$253.21M0.77%
66
Neutral
$979.41M0.52%
75
Outperform
$723.33M0.50%
73
Outperform
$653.12M0.56%
73
Outperform
$505.28M0.55%
69
Neutral
$492.95M0.39%
75
Outperform
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
GARY
Mango Growth ETF
23.66
3.44
17.01%
TGRW
T. Rowe Price Growth Stock ETF
IWLG
IQ Winslow Large Cap Growth ETF
QDVO
Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF
CNEQ
Alger Concentrated Equity ETF
FLCG
Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement