tiprankstipranks
Trending News
More News >
Advertisement

FLQL - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

FLQL

Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity ETF (FLQL)

Rating:75Outperform
Price Target:
FLQL, the Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity ETF, earns a solid overall rating largely because it is heavily invested in high-quality tech leaders like Apple, Microsoft, and Alphabet, which show strong financial performance, positive earnings outlooks, and promising growth in areas like cloud and AI. Holdings such as Nvidia, Broadcom, Meta, and Lam Research further support the rating with AI-driven growth potential, though many of these names trade at premium valuations and show some mixed or cautious technical signals. The main risk factor is the fund’s concentration in large, high-valuation technology and AI-related companies, which could be more volatile if growth expectations or market sentiment weaken.
Positive Factors
Low Expense Ratio
The ETF charges a relatively low fee, which helps investors keep more of their returns over time.
Broad Sector Diversification
Holdings spread across technology, consumer, financial, health care, and other sectors help reduce the impact of weakness in any single industry.
Large, Established U.S. Companies
The fund is built mainly around well-known U.S. blue-chip names like Apple, Microsoft, and Amazon, which tend to be more stable than smaller, less established firms.
Negative Factors
Heavy Tilt Toward Technology
A large share of the portfolio is in technology stocks, which can make the fund more sensitive to swings in that sector.
Concentration in a Few Mega-Cap Stocks
Top positions such as Nvidia, Apple, and Microsoft make up a significant portion of the fund, increasing the impact if any of these companies struggle.
Recent Weakness in Several Top Holdings
Some of the largest positions have shown weak year-to-date performance, which can weigh on the ETF’s overall returns in the near term.

FLQL vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

FLQL Summary

Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity ETF (FLQL) is a fund that follows the LibertyQ US Large Cap Equity Index, focusing on big, well-established American companies. It aims to pick “higher quality” stocks based on things like steady earnings and stronger balance sheets, and it spreads investments across many sectors, with a big tilt toward technology. Well-known holdings include Apple, Microsoft, Nvidia, and Amazon. Someone might invest in FLQL for long-term growth and broad U.S. stock market exposure in a single fund. A key risk is that it is heavily weighted to tech stocks, so its price can rise and fall sharply with that sector.
How much will it cost me?The Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity ETF (FLQL) has an expense ratio of 0.15%, meaning you’ll pay $1.50 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is lower than average because it’s a passively managed fund that tracks an index, which typically keeps costs down compared to actively managed funds.
What would affect this ETF?The Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity ETF (FLQL) could benefit from continued growth in the technology sector, which makes up a significant portion of its holdings, as well as strong performance from top companies like Nvidia, Microsoft, and Apple. However, it may face challenges if interest rates rise, potentially impacting valuations of growth-oriented stocks, or if regulatory changes affect major tech and communication services companies. Broader economic conditions in the U.S., such as a slowdown in consumer spending, could also influence the ETF's performance.

FLQL Top 10 Holdings

FLQL is riding a tech-heavy wave, with Nvidia and Lam Research doing much of the heavy lifting as AI enthusiasm keeps semiconductor names rising. Apple has perked up recently but remains a bit mixed over the longer stretch, while Microsoft and Amazon are losing steam and quietly weighing on returns. Alphabet and Meta are more steady contributors, helping round out the Big Tech tilt. Johnson & Johnson adds a rare dose of defensive strength, but overall this is a U.S.-only fund whose story is dominated by a concentrated bet on large-cap technology leaders.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Apple6.77%$122.18M$3.87T11.79%
79
Outperform
Nvidia6.29%$113.43M$4.38T55.23%
76
Outperform
Microsoft4.77%$85.99M$3.00T3.94%
79
Outperform
Alphabet Class A3.41%$61.52M$3.67T77.62%
85
Outperform
Alphabet Class C2.77%$49.99M$3.67T75.86%
82
Outperform
Amazon2.74%$49.47M$2.24T2.42%
71
Outperform
Broadcom2.46%$44.38M$1.49T67.40%
76
Outperform
Meta Platforms2.33%$42.01M$1.66T2.36%
76
Outperform
Johnson & Johnson1.98%$35.70M$594.64B49.16%
78
Outperform
Visa1.69%$30.45M$611.50B-8.91%
70
Outperform

FLQL Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Neutral
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
70.84
Negative
100DMA
69.66
Positive
200DMA
66.76
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
0.10
Positive
RSI
43.92
Neutral
STOCH
46.90
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For FLQL, the sentiment is Neutral. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 71.28, equal to the 50-day MA of 70.84, and equal to the 200-day MA of 66.76, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of 0.10 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 43.92 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 46.90 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Neutral sentiment for FLQL.

FLQL Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$1.83B0.15%
75
Outperform
$9.40B0.05%
74
Outperform
$9.05B0.34%
72
Outperform
$8.95B0.68%
75
Outperform
$8.38B0.52%
74
Outperform
$8.31B0.61%
75
Outperform
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
FLQL
Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity ETF
70.36
13.00
22.66%
MGC
Vanguard Mega Cap ETF
PRF
Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1000 ETF
QQQI
NEOS Nasdaq 100 High Income ETF
FTCS
First Trust Capital Strength ETF
QYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Disclaimer

This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement