tiprankstipranks
Advertisement

FDLS - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

FDLS

Inspire Fidelis Multi Factor ETF (FDLS)

Rating:71Outperform
Price Target:
FDLS, the Inspire Fidelis Multi Factor ETF, appears to offer solid overall quality, supported by strong holdings like National Energy Services Reunited, Sanmina, XP, and Clear Secure, which benefit from robust financial performance, growth prospects, and generally favorable technical or valuation profiles. The fund’s rating is held back somewhat by weaker names such as Guardian Pharmacy Services and Kimball Electronics, where higher leverage, operational challenges, and bearish or mixed technical signals introduce more risk. Overall, risks seem diversified across individual companies rather than concentrated in a single sector or region, but investors should be aware of holdings with leverage, thin margins, or softer momentum.
Positive Factors
Broad Sector Diversification
The fund spreads its investments across many sectors like technology, financials, industrials, and health care, which helps reduce the impact if any one area struggles.
Strong Recent Performance
The ETF has shown strong gains over the past three months and year-to-date, suggesting its strategy and holdings have been working well recently.
Multiple Strong Top Holdings
Several of the largest positions, such as MKS, United Micro, and Amkor, have delivered strong year-to-date performance, helping support the fund’s overall returns.
Negative Factors
High Expense Ratio
The fund’s expense ratio is relatively high for an ETF, which means more of the returns are eaten up by fees over time.
Heavy U.S. Concentration
With nearly all assets invested in U.S. companies, the fund offers very limited geographic diversification and is highly tied to the U.S. market.
Smaller Fund Size
The ETF’s modest asset size may lead to lower trading volume and potentially wider bid-ask spreads, which can slightly increase trading costs for investors.

FDLS vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

FDLS Summary

The Inspire Fidelis Multi Factor ETF (FDLS) tracks the WI Fidelis Multi-Cap, Multi-Factor Index, aiming to cover the broad U.S. stock market while following values-based (ethical) investing. It owns a mix of large and smaller companies across many sectors like technology, financials, and health care. Well-known holdings include Interactive Brokers and Celsius Holdings. Investors might consider FDLS for diversified stock market exposure with an added focus on aligning investments with personal values. A key risk is that, like most stock funds, its value can go up and down with the overall market.
How much will it cost me?The Inspire Fidelis Multi Factor ETF (FDLS) has an expense ratio of 0.69%, which means you’ll pay $6.90 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average because it is actively managed, using a sophisticated multi-factor strategy to optimize returns and align with ethical investing principles.
What would affect this ETF?The Inspire Fidelis Multi Factor ETF (FDLS) could benefit from strong performance in the technology and industrials sectors, which make up a significant portion of its holdings, as well as continued interest in values-based investing. However, it may face challenges from economic slowdowns or rising interest rates, which could negatively impact smaller companies and growth-oriented investments. Additionally, its focus on U.S. markets means it is sensitive to domestic economic and regulatory changes.

FDLS Top 10 Holdings

FDLS is leaning into a gritty mix of U.S. energy, industrials, and niche tech names rather than the usual mega-cap darlings. Valero Energy and TechnipFMC have been rising and look like key engines for the fund, with Iridium Communications and Mitek Systems adding steady tech-driven lift. On the flip side, MKS Instruments and National Energy Services Reunited have been more mixed lately, occasionally losing steam and trimming some of those gains. Overall, it’s a diversified, U.S.-focused portfolio, but with a noticeable tilt toward energy and industrial momentum stories.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Photronics1.22%$2.03M$2.55B99.54%
74
Outperform
Sanmina-Sci1.10%$1.82M$7.57B76.44%
79
Outperform
Clear Secure1.09%$1.81M$7.26B101.40%
77
Outperform
Tutor Perini1.09%$1.81M$4.14B212.85%
65
Neutral
Kimball Electronics1.09%$1.81M$618.43M48.75%
61
Neutral
Guardian Pharmacy Services, Inc. Class A1.08%$1.80M$2.31B80.42%
54
Neutral
Perdoceo Education1.07%$1.78M$2.37B49.94%
72
Outperform
Plexus1.07%$1.78M$5.82B66.82%
75
Outperform
Adtran1.07%$1.78M$1.02B36.80%
50
Neutral
ArcBest1.07%$1.77M$2.14B29.98%
66
Neutral

FDLS Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Positive
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
38.03
Negative
100DMA
36.81
Positive
200DMA
34.92
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
-0.39
Positive
RSI
49.27
Neutral
STOCH
76.69
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For FDLS, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 37.61, equal to the 50-day MA of 38.03, and equal to the 200-day MA of 34.92, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of -0.39 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 49.27 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 76.69 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for FDLS.

FDLS Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$166.61M0.69%
71
Outperform
$974.84M0.10%
75
Outperform
$908.60M1.30%
60
Neutral
$876.34M0.59%
69
Neutral
$821.90M0.27%
71
Outperform
$723.82M0.50%
76
Outperform
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
FDLS
Inspire Fidelis Multi Factor ETF
36.89
8.44
29.67%
SUSL
iShares ESG MSCI USA Leaders ETF
ULTY
YieldMax Ultra Option Income Strategy ETF
SYLD
Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF
AUSF
Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF
HLAL
Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement