DFAS - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF (DFAS)
Rating:68Neutral
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Strong Recent Performance
The ETF has delivered strong gains so far this year and over the past month, showing solid recent momentum.
Broad Sector Diversification
Holdings are spread across many sectors like financials, industrials, technology, and health care, which helps reduce the impact of weakness in any single industry.
Healthy Size and Reasonable Costs
The fund manages a large asset base with a moderate expense ratio, suggesting investor confidence while keeping ongoing costs relatively manageable.
Negative Factors
Heavy U.S. Concentration
Almost all of the ETF’s assets are invested in U.S. companies, offering very limited geographic diversification.
Small-Cap Volatility Risk
Because the fund focuses on small U.S. companies, it may be more sensitive to market swings and economic slowdowns than large-cap funds.
Some Lagging Holdings
At least one of the top positions has shown weak performance this year, which can drag on overall returns if the weakness continues.
DFAS vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM14.00B
RegionNorth America
Expense Ratio0.26%
Beta0.97
IssuerDimensional
Inception DateJun 14, 2021
Dividend Yield0.94%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedNo Underlying Index
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume398,192
30 Day Avg. Volume544,655
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
91.62Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering2093
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
DFAS Summary
DFAS, the Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF, focuses on smaller U.S. companies across many industries, including financials, industrials, technology, and health care. It does not track a traditional index, but follows a small-cap theme, aiming to find profitable, attractively priced smaller firms. Well-known holdings include BorgWarner and Jazz Pharmaceuticals. Investors might consider DFAS if they want long-term growth potential and diversification beyond large, familiar blue-chip stocks. However, small-cap stocks can be more volatile, so the ETF’s price can move up and down more sharply than the overall market.
How much will it cost me?The Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF (DFAS) has an expense ratio of 0.27%, meaning you’ll pay $2.70 per year for every $1,000 invested. This cost is slightly higher than average for ETFs because it is actively managed, focusing on selecting small-cap stocks with high profitability and attractive valuations. Active management typically involves more research and decision-making compared to passively managed funds, which track an index.
What would affect this ETF?The Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF (DFAS) could benefit from economic growth and innovation in the U.S., particularly in sectors like technology and industrials, which are key components of the fund. However, it may face challenges from rising interest rates or economic slowdowns, which can negatively impact small-cap companies that often rely on borrowing or are more sensitive to market conditions. Regulatory changes or sector-specific disruptions in areas like healthcare or energy could also influence the ETF's performance.
DFAS Top 10 Holdings
DFAS is leaning hard into U.S. small-cap growth stories, with a clear tech-and-industry flavor driving the show. Semiconductor and electronics names like Amkor, Onto Innovation, and Rambus have been rising, giving the fund a helpful tailwind as demand tied to AI and advanced manufacturing stays strong. Modine and Wesco International add more industrial punch, also trending positively. The main weak spot is Hecla Mining, which has been lagging and slightly dulling returns. Overall, the ETF is broadly diversified across sectors but firmly rooted in smaller U.S. innovators.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTM Technologies | 0.34% | $48.69M | $16.96B | 448.19% | 77 Outperform | |
| Amkor | 0.30% | $42.64M | $18.21B | 266.33% | 69 Neutral | |
| Wesco International | 0.30% | $42.38M | $17.64B | 108.32% | 75 Outperform | |
| DigitalOcean Holdings | 0.29% | $40.77M | $16.25B | 414.77% | 73 Outperform | |
| Rambus | 0.28% | $39.32M | $14.09B | 129.89% | 78 Outperform | |
| BorgWarner | 0.27% | $38.60M | $13.07B | 92.39% | 65 Neutral | |
| Sanmina-Sci | 0.27% | $38.29M | $12.64B | 176.58% | 79 Outperform | |
| Hecla Mining Company | 0.27% | $38.09M | $13.80B | 316.40% | 74 Outperform | |
| Jazz Pharmaceuticals | 0.27% | $38.01M | $14.30B | 121.40% | 64 Neutral | |
| Advanced Energy | 0.27% | $37.94M | $12.91B | 182.52% | 67 Neutral |
DFAS Technical Analysis
Positive
―
Price Trends
74.00
Positive
73.87
Positive
70.76
Positive
Market Momentum
0.76
Positive
54.66
Neutral
28.38
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For DFAS, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 77.13, equal to the 50-day MA of 74.00, and equal to the 200-day MA of 70.76, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of 0.76 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 54.66 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 28.38 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for DFAS.
DFAS Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
DFAS
Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF
76.90
15.06
24.35%
DFAC
Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF
―
―
―
JEPI
JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF
―
―
―
JEPQ
J.P. Morgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF
―
―
―
DYNF
BlackRock U.S. Equity Factor Rotation ETF
―
―
―
AVUV
Avantis U.S. Small Cap Value ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents