tiprankstipranks
Advertisement

DAT - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

DAT

ProShares Big Data Refiners ETF (DAT)

Rating:67Neutral
Price Target:
DAT, the ProShares Big Data Refiners ETF, has a solid overall rating, mainly because several key holdings like Dynatrace, Braze, and Nice show strong financial performance, growth in AI-driven software, and positive earnings updates. These strengths are partly offset by holdings such as Snowflake and Cellebrite, where profitability, high valuations, and some bearish technical signals introduce risk. The main risk factor is that many top positions share similar challenges around rich valuations and periods of weak price momentum, which can make the fund more sensitive to market pullbacks in high-growth tech names.
Positive Factors
Strong Recent Short-Term Performance
The ETF has shown strong gains over the last one and three months, indicating improving momentum in the near term.
Leading Data and Software Holdings
Several top positions, such as Datadog, Snowflake, CommVault Systems, Five9, and Zebra Technologies, have delivered strong year-to-date performance, helping support the fund’s returns.
Focused Exposure to Growing Technology Theme
The fund is heavily tilted toward technology companies involved in data and software, giving investors targeted exposure to a fast-growing area of the market.
Negative Factors
Weak Year-to-Date Overall Performance
Despite recent gains, the ETF’s year-to-date performance is still negative, showing that it has struggled over the longer part of the year.
High Concentration in Technology Sector
With most assets in technology and very limited exposure to other sectors, the fund is more vulnerable to downturns in tech stocks.
Several Lagging Top Holdings
Some major positions, including AvePoint, Cellebrite DI, Braze, Nice, and Dynatrace, have shown weak year-to-date performance, which can drag on the fund’s overall results.

DAT vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

DAT Summary

ProShares Big Data Refiners ETF (ticker DAT) follows the FactSet Big Data Refiners Index, focusing on companies that turn large amounts of data into useful information. It mainly holds U.S. technology firms involved in cloud computing, data analytics, and artificial intelligence. Well-known names in the fund include Snowflake and Datadog, along with other specialized software companies. An investor might choose this ETF to tap into the long-term growth potential of big data and to get diversified exposure to many data-focused tech stocks in one purchase. However, it is heavily concentrated in technology and can go up and down sharply with that sector.
How much will it cost me?The ProShares Big Data Refiners ETF (Ticker: DAT) has an expense ratio of 0.58%, which means you’ll pay $5.80 per year for every $1,000 invested. This is higher than average because the fund is actively managed and focuses on a specialized niche within the Information Technology sector, requiring more research and management effort.
What would affect this ETF?The ProShares Big Data Refiners ETF could benefit from the growing demand for data analytics, cloud computing, and artificial intelligence as businesses increasingly rely on these technologies to drive innovation and efficiency. However, the ETF may face challenges from rising interest rates, which can impact the valuation of technology companies, and potential regulatory scrutiny on data privacy and usage, which could affect its top holdings like MongoDB and Palantir Technologies.

DAT Top 10 Holdings

DAT is essentially a pure play on cloud data and analytics, with heavy exposure to U.S. and global software names. Datadog and Snowflake are doing the heavy lifting, with rising share prices fueled by strong growth in AI-driven data services. Nutanix and Five9 are also adding some spark, keeping the fund’s tech engine humming. On the flip side, AvePoint and Cellebrite are lagging, acting like small anchors on performance, while InterDigital and Dynatrace show more mixed momentum. Overall, this is a concentrated bet on the big data software wave.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Zebra Tech6.31%$392.83K$17.81B21.00%
72
Outperform
Five95.67%$353.49K$2.54B43.37%
69
Neutral
Snowflake5.44%$338.72K$114.55B74.50%
54
Neutral
InterDigital5.17%$322.13K$8.89B30.77%
76
Outperform
Palantir Technologies5.00%$311.73K$413.36B-4.08%
74
Outperform
Braze4.86%$302.59K$2.99B19.15%
76
Outperform
Elastic4.78%$297.80K$7.81B5.21%
65
Neutral
Nutanix4.65%$289.75K$16.94B-6.31%
62
Neutral
Dynatrace4.64%$289.01K$14.15B9.84%
77
Outperform
MongoDB4.59%$286.25K$32.08B107.30%
75
Outperform

DAT Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Positive
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
43.76
Positive
100DMA
40.44
Positive
200DMA
41.43
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
1.70
Negative
RSI
66.05
Neutral
STOCH
92.93
Negative
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For DAT, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 45.43, equal to the 50-day MA of 43.76, and equal to the 200-day MA of 41.43, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 1.70 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 66.05 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 92.93 is Negative, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for DAT.

DAT Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$6.23M0.58%
67
Neutral
$53.80M0.50%
66
Neutral
$41.67M0.75%
60
Neutral
$15.06M
59
Neutral
$3.95M0.50%
69
Neutral
$3.57M0.35%
66
Neutral
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
DAT
ProShares Big Data Refiners ETF
49.12
3.82
8.43%
RACK
VanEck Data Center Supply Chain ETF
TEK
iShares Technology Opportunities Active ETF
GGTL
Gabelli Global Technology Leaders ETF
XDAT
Franklin Exponential Data ETF
EYES
Corgi Data & Surveillance ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement