tiprankstipranks
Trending News
More News >
Advertisement

BMVP - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

BMVP

Invesco Bloomberg Mvp Multi-Factor Etf (BMVP)

Rating:73Outperform
Price Target:
BMVP, the Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-Factor ETF, has a solid overall rating driven by strong, diversified holdings like Ulta Beauty, which benefits from robust financial performance and a positive business outlook, and Jabil, which adds support through strong earnings and favorable technical trends. However, several holdings such as Home Depot, Sherwin-Williams, and Marathon Petroleum face technical weakness, leverage, or valuation concerns, which temper the fund’s rating. The main risk factor is that many top positions show some combination of bearish technical signals, high leverage, or valuation pressure, which could increase volatility even though the underlying businesses are generally strong.
Positive Factors
Strong Recent Performance
The ETF has shown steady gains over the past month, three months, and year-to-date, indicating positive recent momentum.
Solid Top Holdings
Many of the largest positions, such as Lockheed Martin, Halliburton, and Home Depot, have delivered strong year-to-date results that support the fund’s overall performance.
Broad Sector Diversification
The fund spreads its investments across many sectors, including technology, financials, industrials, consumer, health care, and energy, which helps reduce the impact of weakness in any single area.
Negative Factors
Single-Country Concentration
Almost all of the ETF’s assets are invested in U.S. companies, so it offers little geographic diversification outside the United States.
Moderate Expense Ratio
The fund’s expense ratio is not especially low, meaning fees may be higher than some of the cheapest index ETFs available.
Smaller Asset Base
With a relatively modest amount of money invested in the fund, it may be less liquid and more sensitive to large investor flows than bigger, more established ETFs.

BMVP vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

BMVP Summary

The Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-Factor ETF (BMVP) is a U.S. stock fund that follows the Bloomberg MVP Index. It focuses on large, well-established companies across many sectors, including technology, financials, and industrials. Well-known holdings include Home Depot and Lockheed Martin. The fund uses a rules-based approach that looks at things like value, recent performance, and company quality to try to improve returns and diversification compared with a simple market index. A key risk is that it still invests in stocks, so its value can rise and fall with the overall stock market.
How much will it cost me?The Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-Factor ETF (BMVP) has an expense ratio of 0.29%, which means you’ll pay $2.90 per year for every $1,000 invested. This cost is slightly higher than average for ETFs because it uses an actively managed multi-factor strategy to select stocks, rather than simply tracking a broad index. It’s designed to potentially offer better returns through its targeted approach.
What would affect this ETF?The BMVP ETF, with its focus on large-cap U.S. companies across diverse sectors like technology, financials, and healthcare, could benefit from economic growth and innovation in these industries, particularly if consumer spending and corporate earnings remain strong. However, rising interest rates or regulatory changes could negatively impact sectors like financials and technology, while broader economic slowdowns might affect the performance of large-cap stocks overall.

BMVP Top 10 Holdings

BMVP is leaning into a mix of industrial strength and consumer resilience, with names like Lockheed Martin, Halliburton, and Cummins doing much of the heavy lifting as their shares have been steadily rising on solid fundamentals and upbeat outlooks. Ulta Beauty has also been a bright spot, adding some consumer sparkle to returns. On the softer side, Home Depot and Marathon Petroleum look a bit tired, with more mixed or lagging trends that can occasionally tug on performance. Overall, it’s a U.S.-focused, sector-diversified play rather than a Big Tech–dominated story.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Lockheed Martin2.28%$2.39M$150.15B52.28%
70
Outperform
PPG Industries2.17%$2.27M$29.47B8.32%
67
Neutral
Ball2.15%$2.25M$18.03B34.98%
59
Neutral
Marathon Petroleum2.11%$2.21M$61.10B27.81%
66
Neutral
Sysco2.08%$2.18M$43.37B29.37%
71
Outperform
Devon Energy2.06%$2.16M$27.50B28.04%
79
Outperform
Illinois Tool Works2.06%$2.16M$86.91B13.41%
71
Outperform
PulteGroup2.06%$2.15M$27.39B35.00%
70
Outperform
Verizon2.04%$2.13M$206.65B18.96%
81
Outperform
Halliburton2.03%$2.13M$28.44B27.05%
72
Outperform

BMVP Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Positive
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
50.37
Positive
100DMA
49.30
Positive
200DMA
48.49
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
0.61
Positive
RSI
60.96
Neutral
STOCH
44.83
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For BMVP, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 51.64, equal to the 50-day MA of 50.37, and equal to the 200-day MA of 48.49, indicating a bullish trend. The MACD of 0.61 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 60.96 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 44.83 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for BMVP.

BMVP Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$103.59M0.29%
$992.02M0.10%
$939.81M0.05%
$879.98M0.29%
$876.63M0.15%
$852.78M0.20%
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
BMVP
Invesco Bloomberg Mvp Multi-Factor Etf
52.27
4.06
8.42%
EFIV
SPDR S&P 500 ESG ETF
VOTE
Engine No. 1 Transform 500 ETF
NBCR
Neuberger Berman Core Equity ETF
QQQJ
Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF
ONEY
SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Disclaimer

This AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement