tiprankstipranks
Advertisement

BMVP - ETF AI Analysis

Compare

Top Page

BMVP

Invesco Bloomberg Mvp Multi-Factor Etf (BMVP)

Rating:73Outperform
Price Target:
BMVP, the Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-Factor ETF, has an overall rating that suggests it is a solid, but not flawless, fund with a generally positive outlook. Strong holdings like Verizon, Ross Stores, Devon Energy, and Johnson & Johnson support the rating through solid financial performance, positive earnings calls, and attractive or reasonable valuations. However, weaker names such as Kroger, with profitability challenges, high leverage, and bearish technical signals, along with some holdings facing valuation or leverage concerns, slightly weigh on the fund and highlight risks tied to individual company fundamentals rather than a single sector or region.
Positive Factors
Strong Recent Performance
The ETF has shown steady gains over the past month, three months, and year-to-date, indicating positive recent momentum.
Solid Top Holdings
Many of the largest positions, such as Lockheed Martin, Halliburton, and Home Depot, have delivered strong year-to-date results that support the fund’s overall performance.
Broad Sector Diversification
The fund spreads its investments across many sectors, including technology, financials, industrials, consumer, health care, and energy, which helps reduce the impact of weakness in any single area.
Negative Factors
Single-Country Concentration
Almost all of the ETF’s assets are invested in U.S. companies, so it offers little geographic diversification outside the United States.
Moderate Expense Ratio
The fund’s expense ratio is not especially low, meaning fees may be higher than some of the cheapest index ETFs available.
Smaller Asset Base
With a relatively modest amount of money invested in the fund, it may be less liquid and more sensitive to large investor flows than bigger, more established ETFs.

BMVP vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)

BMVP Summary

The Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-Factor ETF (BMVP) is a U.S. stock fund that follows the Bloomberg MVP Index. It focuses on large, well-established companies across many sectors, including technology, financials, and industrials. Well-known holdings include Home Depot and Lockheed Martin. The fund uses a rules-based approach that looks at things like value, recent performance, and company quality to try to improve returns and diversification compared with a simple market index. A key risk is that it still invests in stocks, so its value can rise and fall with the overall stock market.
How much will it cost me?The Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-Factor ETF (BMVP) has an expense ratio of 0.29%, which means you’ll pay $2.90 per year for every $1,000 invested. This cost is slightly higher than average for ETFs because it uses an actively managed multi-factor strategy to select stocks, rather than simply tracking a broad index. It’s designed to potentially offer better returns through its targeted approach.
What would affect this ETF?The BMVP ETF, with its focus on large-cap U.S. companies across diverse sectors like technology, financials, and healthcare, could benefit from economic growth and innovation in these industries, particularly if consumer spending and corporate earnings remain strong. However, rising interest rates or regulatory changes could negatively impact sectors like financials and technology, while broader economic slowdowns might affect the performance of large-cap stocks overall.

BMVP Top 10 Holdings

BMVP leans heavily into U.S. large caps with a noticeable tilt toward energy and industrial workhorses. Marathon Petroleum and Devon Energy have been rising and look like key engines for the fund, with Halliburton adding steady support from the oilfield side. Defense giant Lockheed Martin has been solid over the past few months, even if it’s hit a short-term air pocket. On the steadier side, Verizon and Johnson & Johnson act like ballast, helping smooth the ride when more cyclical names wobble.
Name
Company Name
Weight %
Market Value
Market Cap
Yearly Gain
Overall Rating
Marathon Petroleum2.78%$2.73M$71.09B98.42%
66
Neutral
Halliburton2.56%$2.52M$31.68B89.19%
72
Outperform
Devon Energy2.55%$2.50M$30.78B73.54%
79
Outperform
Lockheed Martin2.28%$2.24M$146.77B48.07%
70
Outperform
Verizon2.21%$2.18M$207.30B15.43%
81
Outperform
Ross Stores2.11%$2.07M$71.31B72.98%
80
Outperform
Kroger Company2.10%$2.06M$44.74B9.88%
56
Neutral
Johnson & Johnson2.08%$2.05M$580.40B59.98%
78
Outperform
Jabil2.05%$2.02M$28.24B120.54%
73
Outperform
American Electric Power2.02%$1.99M$71.59B30.31%
69
Neutral

BMVP Technical Analysis

Technical Analysis Sentiment
Positive
Last Price
Price Trends
50DMA
51.20
Negative
100DMA
50.11
Positive
200DMA
48.97
Positive
Market Momentum
MACD
-0.38
Negative
RSI
47.42
Neutral
STOCH
85.63
Negative
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For BMVP, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 50.21, equal to the 50-day MA of 51.20, and equal to the 200-day MA of 48.97, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of -0.38 indicates Negative momentum. The RSI at 47.42 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 85.63 is Negative, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for BMVP.

BMVP Peer Comparison

Comparison Results
Name
Price
Price Target
AUM
Expense Ratio
Overall Rating
$99.01M0.29%
73
Outperform
$95.90M0.79%
70
Neutral
$95.27M0.30%
72
Outperform
$94.65M0.60%
70
Outperform
$87.42M0.45%
69
Neutral
$81.35M0.92%
62
Neutral
Performance Comparison
Ticker
Company Name
Price
Change
% Change
BMVP
Invesco Bloomberg Mvp Multi-Factor Etf
50.30
6.50
14.84%
UPSD
Aptus Large Cap Upside ETF
LVDS
JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF
ALTL
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF
ACEP
ARS Core Equity Portfolio ETF
EGGY
NestYield Dynamic Income Shield ETF
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents
Advertisement