SMRF - ETF AI Analysis
Top Page
ALPS Nautilus SMR, Nuclear & Technology ETF (SMRF)
Rating:55Neutral
Price Target:―
Positive Factors
Strong Recent Performance
The ETF has shown solid gains so far this year and over the past month, indicating positive recent momentum.
Focused Exposure to Nuclear and Related Technologies
Many of the top holdings are companies directly involved in uranium, nuclear power, and related technology, giving targeted exposure to this theme.
Global Diversification Within the Theme
Holdings spread across the U.S., Canada, the UK, Hong Kong, Australia, and Spain help reduce the risk of being tied to just one country’s nuclear and energy policies.
Negative Factors
High Sector Concentration in Energy
A large portion of the portfolio is in the energy sector, which can make the fund more sensitive to swings in energy and uranium markets.
Relatively High Expense Ratio
The fund’s fee is on the higher side for an ETF, which can eat into long-term returns compared with lower-cost options.
Small Asset Base
With a relatively low level of assets under management, the ETF may face higher trading spreads and a greater risk of changes to the fund over time.
SMRF vs. SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
AUM13.19M
RegionGlobal
Expense Ratio0.65%
Beta1.77
IssuerALPS
Inception DateFeb 18, 2026
Dividend Yield0.09%
Asset ClassEquity
Index TrackedNo Underlying Index
Share Statistics
EPS (TTM)N/A
Shares OutstandingN/A
10 Day Avg. Volume11,072
30 Day Avg. Volume10,329
Financial Highlights & Ratios
PEG RatioN/A
Price to Book (P/B)N/A
Price to Sales (P/S)N/A
P/FCF RatioN/A
Enterprise Value/Market CapN/A
Enterprise Value/RevenueN/A
Enterprise Value/Gross ProfitN/A
Enterprise Value/EbitdaN/A
Forecast
1Y Price Target
33.86Price Target Upside― Downside
Rating ConsensusModerate Buy
Number of Analyst Covering73
EPS Forecast (FY)N/A
Revenue Forecast (FY)N/A
SMRF Summary
ALPS Nautilus SMR, Nuclear & Technology ETF (SMRF) is an actively managed fund focused on the global nuclear energy theme, especially small modular reactors (SMRs), rather than tracking a traditional index. It holds companies involved in uranium supply, reactor design, and nuclear power operations, plus some technology and AI firms that support these reactors. Well-known names include Cameco and GE Vernova. Someone might invest for targeted growth in nuclear energy and to add a different kind of clean-energy exposure to their portfolio. A key risk is that it’s concentrated in one sector, so its price can swing more than the overall market.
How much will it cost me?This ETF has an expense ratio of 0.65%, which means you’ll pay about $6.50 per year for every $1,000 you invest. That’s higher than the average ETF because it’s actively managed and focuses on a specialized nuclear and technology theme, which typically costs more to run than broad, passive index funds.
What would affect this ETF?This ETF could benefit if governments and utilities expand nuclear power and small modular reactor projects worldwide, boosting demand for companies like uranium miners, reactor makers, and related technology firms in its energy and tech-heavy portfolio. On the other hand, stricter nuclear regulations, safety concerns, delays in SMR adoption, changing energy policies, or higher interest rates that hurt growth and utility stocks could weigh on performance, and its concentrated nuclear theme and options strategy may make it more volatile than a broad market fund.
SMRF Top 10 Holdings
SMRF is tightly hitched to the nuclear fuel and reactor story, with names like Cameco, NexGen Energy, Uranium Energy, and Paladin Energy setting the tone. These uranium producers have been rising over the year, even if they’ve stumbled recently, and they’re the main engines behind the fund’s longer-term gains. GE Vernova adds a strong, more diversified industrial boost with momentum on its side, while Oklo is more of a speculative SMR bet that’s been lagging. Overall, this is a globally focused, nuclear-heavy portfolio with a clear tilt toward a few key energy names.
Name | Company Name | Weight % | Market Value | Market Cap | Yearly Gain | Overall Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BWX Technologies | 4.25% | $552.19K | $17.77B | 39.55% | 75 Outperform | |
| Cameco | 4.12% | $535.30K | C$65.23B | 55.78% | 71 Outperform | |
| NexGen Energy | 3.89% | $505.11K | C$9.78B | 54.14% | 53 Neutral | |
| GE Vernova Inc. | 3.89% | $504.93K | $263.10B | 101.03% | 69 Neutral | |
| National Atomic Company Kazatomprom JSC GDR RegS | 3.81% | $494.25K | $19.06B | 68.36% | ― | |
| CGN Power Co | 3.78% | $491.26K | HK$234.97B | -93.63% | 58 Neutral | |
| Oklo Inc | 3.63% | $470.80K | $10.57B | -8.48% | 42 Neutral | |
| Uranium Energy | 3.39% | $440.76K | $5.82B | 76.02% | 54 Neutral | |
| X-Energy, Inc. Class A | 3.18% | $413.13K | $8.57B | ― | ― | |
| Paladin Energy Ltd | 3.05% | $395.71K | C$4.65B | 51.46% | 45 Neutral |
SMRF Technical Analysis
Positive
―
Price Trends
27.14
Positive
Market Momentum
-0.13
Positive
52.42
Neutral
69.20
Neutral
Evaluating momentum and price trends is crucial in ETF analysis to make informed investment decisions. For SMRF, the sentiment is Positive. The current price of undefined is equal to the 20-day moving average (MA) of 27.12, equal to the 50-day MA of 27.14, and equal to the 200-day MA of ―, indicating a neutral trend. The MACD of -0.13 indicates Positive momentum. The RSI at 52.42 is Neutral, neither overbought nor oversold. The STOCH value of 69.20 is Neutral, not indicating any strong overbought or oversold conditions. Overall, these indicators collectively point to a Positive sentiment for SMRF.
SMRF Peer Comparison
Comparison Results
Performance Comparison
SMRF
ALPS Nautilus SMR, Nuclear & Technology ETF
27.43
1.46
5.62%
CSNR
Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF
―
―
―
MARS
Roundhill Space & Technology ETF
―
―
―
HECO
SPDR Galaxy Hedged Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF
―
―
―
TEKY
Lazard Next Gen Technologies ETF
―
―
―
TNUK
Tortoise Nuclear Renaissance ETF
―
―
―
Glossary
BuyAn ETF rated as a "Buy" is expected to perform better than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF is likely to deliver higher returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HoldAn ETF rated as a "Hold" s expected to perform in line with the overall market or a specific benchmark. This rating indicates that the ETF is neither particularly compelling nor unfavorable for investment. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
SellAn ETF rated as a "Sell" is expected to perform worse than the overall market or a specific benchmark over the near-to-medium term. This rating suggests the ETF may deliver lower returns compared to other ETFs in the same sector or market index. Note: This is not investment advice; please consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions.
DisclaimerThis AI Analyst ETF Report is automatically generated by our AI systems using advanced algorithms and publicly available financial, technical, and market data. While the information provided aims to be accurate and insightful, it is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Any content created by an AI (Artificial Intelligence) system may contain inaccuracies and/or contain errors. Investing in ETFs carries inherent risks, and past performance is not indicative of future results. This report does not account for your personal financial circumstances, objectives, or risk tolerance. Always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. The analysis and recommendations provided are based on historical and current data and may not fully reflect future market conditions or unexpected developments. Neither the creators of this report nor its affiliated entities guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the information presented. Use this report at your own discretion and risk.Date of analysis: ―
Table of Contents